2244The state human rights commission established in Jammu and Kashmir by an actof the state legislature, in 1997, has no power to investigate independently allegedhuman rights violations committed by security force members. Credible humanrights monitors say that the Jammu and Kashmir Commission has not yet demonstratedeffective, independent protection of human rights in the state.A People’s Commission that was established in 1998 by retired Supreme CourtJustice Kuldip Singh to highlight the fate of more than 2,000 persons who ‘‘disappeared’’during the period of political unrest in Punjab (see Section 1.b.) continuedto receive little cooperation from state government authorities.The prison visits program in Jammu and Kashmir by the ICRC, initiated in October1995, continued during the year (see Section 1.c.). ICRC representatives alsocontinued training police and Border Security Force personnel in international humanitarianlaw.The Government continued to refuse repeated UNHCR requests for access to theSri Lankan Tamil refugee camps in Tamil Nadu (see Section 2.d.).Section 5. Discrimination Based on Race, Sex, Religion, Disability, Language, or SocialstatusThe traditional caste system as well as differences of ethnicity, religion, and languagedeeply divide society. Despite laws designed to prevent discrimination, otherlegislation as well as social and cultural practices have a profound discriminatoryimpact. According to the National Commission for Scheduled Castes and ScheduledTribes, caste clashes are frequent in Uttar Pradesh, Bihar, and Tamil Nadu.Women.—Domestic violence is common and a serious problem. According to a1996 survey in Uttar Pradesh, 30 percent of married men acknowledged physicallyabusing their wives. In a survey of 10,000 women released during the year, morethan half of the women said that violence was a normal part of married life. TheHealth Ministry released a different survey during the year that indicated that, of90,000 women surveyed, more than half acknowledge being battered. Dowry disputesalso are a serious problem. In the typical dowry dispute, a groom’s familymembers harass a new wife whom they believe has not provided a sufficient dowry.This harassment sometimes ends in the woman’s death, which family membersoften try to portray as a suicide or kitchen accident; recent research suggests thata significant percentage of kerosene attacks also are due to domestic violence. Althoughmost ‘‘dowry deaths’’ involve lower and middle-class families, the phenomenoncrosses both caste and religious lines. According to National CrimeRecords Bureau (NCRB) statistics, 6,917 dowry deaths occurred in the country in1998, including 2,229 dowry deaths in Uttar Pradesh, 1,039 in Bihar, 598 inMadhya Pradesh, 500 in Andhra Pradesh, 420 in Maharashtra, 200 in Karnataka,176 in Tamil Nadu, and 21 in Kerala.Under a 1986 amendment to the Penal Code, the court must presume that thehusband or the wife’s in-laws are responsible for every unnatural death of a womanin the first 7 years of marriage—provided that harassment is proven. In such cases,police procedures require that an officer of deputy superintendent rank or aboveconduct the investigation and that a team of two or more doctors perform the postmortemprocedures. According to human rights monitors, in practice police do notfollow these procedures consistently.The issue of rape has received greater political and social attention than in earlieryears. In July the NHRC directed the Andhra Pradesh government to pay $1,100(50,000 rupees) in compensation to each of four Dalit women who were raped inGodavari district. The NHRC overturned a state ruling that had denied the womenmonetary compensation because the victims and their attackers were members oflow caste and tribal communities. The press consistently reports that such violenceagainst women is increasing, although local women’s organizations claim that theresimply has been increased reporting. Only 10 percent of rape cases are fully adjudicatedby the courts, and police typically fail to arrest rapists, thus fostering a climateof impunity. In May the Central Bureau of Investigation initiated an inquiryinto the alleged gang rape of three women by police officials in Pilibhit district,Uttar Pradesh in August 1998. According to a complaint filed by a witness, threeofficers of the Madho Tanda police station in Pilibhit district entered the victims’home late on the night of August 16–17 and raped the three women. On May 30,a court in Jalpaiguri, West Bengal sentenced Kashinath Tripathy and BhusonBarua to life imprisonment for the 1982 rape of a girl in Jalpaiguri.In September in Kulkul village, Orissa, a group of villagers hacked to death a 60-year-old tribal woman, Namsi Ho, allegedly for practicing witchraft. Police arrestedfour persons in connection with the killing. On October 16 and November 19, inGanjam district, Orissa, villagers accused Kumari Behera, of sorcery, and torturedVerDate 11-MAY-2000 13:46 Sep 20, 2001 Jkt 071555 PO 00000 Frm 00088 Fmt 6601 Sfmt 6621 F:\WORK\COUNTRYR\S71555\71555.035 HINTREL1 PsN: HINTREL1
2245and branded her with hot iron rods. Five persons were arrested in connection withthe assaults.According to NCRB statistics, in 1998 there were 15,031 reported rapes, 16,381abductions of women, 6,917 dowry deaths, 41,318 reported cases of torture ofwomen, 31,046 cases of molestation, and 8,123 cases of sexual harassment. TheNCRB recorded 131,338 crimes against women in 1998, compared with 121,265 in1997. In 1997, 678 cases of gang rape were recorded. Gang rapes often are committedas punishment for alleged adultery or as a means of coercion or revenge inrural property disputes and feuds. On February 1, the <strong>Committee</strong> on the Eliminationof Discrimination Against Women (CEDAW) of the U.N. Commission onHuman Rights (UNCHR) expressed concern that ‘‘there is a high incidence of gender-basedviolence against women, which takes even more extreme forms becauseof customary practices such as dowry, sati (the burning alive of widows on theirhusbands’ funeral pyre) and the Devadasi system (the practice of dedicating ormarrying young, prepubescent girls to a Hindu deity or temple as servants of God.Devadasis, who generally are Dalits, may not marry. They are taken from their familiesand are required to provide sexual services to priests and high caste Hindus.Reportedly, many eventually are sold to urban brothels’’ (see Sections 6.c. and 6.f.).The committee further stated that ‘‘discrimination against women who belong toparticular castes or ethnic or religious groups also is manifest in extreme forms ofphysical and sexual violence and harassment.’’Higher female mortality at all age levels, including female infanticide and sex selectivetermination of pregnancies, accounts for an increase in the ratio of males tofemales to 107.9 males per 100 females in 1991, from 104.7 males per 100 femalesin 1981, and from 102.9 males per 100 females at the turn of the century. In somedistricts of Tamil Nadu, female infanticide occurs despite government and NGO programsintended to counter the practice. In July the district collector of Dharmapuri,Tamil Nadu, formed a team to investigate the murder of a girl in Pararrapatti village.The team exhumed the buried body and arrested the girl’s father and anotheraccomplice. In August the maimed body of a newborn girl was found under a bridgein Tirunelveli, Tamil Nadu. Police believe that the child’s mother abandoned her inthe public place hoping that someone would take her in. On February 1, CEDAWexpressed concern that ‘‘India has not yet established a comprehensive and compulsorysystem of registration of births and marriages. The <strong>Committee</strong> notes that inabilityto prove those important events by documentation prevents effective implementationof laws that protect girls from sexual exploitation and trafficking, childlabor and forced or early marriage.’’Numerous laws exist to protect women’s rights, including the Equal RemunerationAct, the Prevention of Immoral Traffic Act, the Sati (Widow Burning) PreventionAct, and the Dowry Prohibition Act. However, the Government often is unableto enforce these laws, especially in rural areas in which traditions are deeply rooted.According to press reports, the rate of acquittal in dowry death cases is high, andbecause of court backlogs it takes 6 to 7 years on average to rule on such cases.On February 1, CEDAW noted that ‘‘there is an urgent need to introduce comprehensive[legislative] reform to promote equality and the human rights of women.’’Prostitution is widespread, with an estimated 2.3 million prostitutes in the country,some 575,000 of whom are children. Many indigenous tribal women are forcedinto sexual exploitation (see Section 6.c.). In Assam’s Chars River islands, somewomen work as prostitutes in exchange for as little as $0.23 (10 rupees). In 1998prostitutes began to demand legal rights, licenses, and reemployment training, especiallyin Mumbai and New Delhi.In 1997 Karnataka’s government made sexual harassment a criminal offense.The country is a significant source, transit point, and destination for many thousandsof trafficked women (see Section 6.f.).Literacy rates for women are significantly lower than rates for men; the 2000U.N. Development Program (UNDP) Report for India found that 38 percent ofwomen were literate, compared with 66 percent of men.The law prohibits discrimination in the workplace, but enforcement is inadequate.In both rural and urban areas, women get lower wages than men for doing the samejob. Women experience economic discrimination in access to employment and credit.This acts as an impediment to women owning a business, and the promotion ofwomen to managerial positions within businesses often is slower than that of males.State governments have supported micro-credit programs for women that havebegun to have an impact in many rural districts.The personal status laws of the religious communities discriminate againstwomen. Under the Indian Divorce Act of 1869, a Christian woman may demand divorceonly in the case of spousal abuse and in the case of certain categories of adultery;for a Christian man, adultery alone is sufficient. In 1997 the Mumbai HighVerDate 11-MAY-2000 13:46 Sep 20, 2001 Jkt 071555 PO 00000 Frm 00089 Fmt 6601 Sfmt 6621 F:\WORK\COUNTRYR\S71555\71555.035 HINTREL1 PsN: HINTREL1
- Page 7 and 8:
2163All factions probably hold poli
- Page 9 and 10:
2165and unexploded ordnance. Nevert
- Page 11 and 12:
2167bade non-Muslims from living in
- Page 13 and 14:
2169tion of most of the country. Go
- Page 15 and 16:
2171Women accused of adultery also
- Page 17 and 18:
2173violations of the rights to edu
- Page 19 and 20:
2175paper and firewood, shining sho
- Page 21 and 22:
2177ister made remarks implying tha
- Page 23 and 24:
2179central unit of its student win
- Page 25 and 26:
2181humiliating, painful punishment
- Page 27 and 28:
2183ment of the split verdict in th
- Page 29 and 30:
2185The court system has two levels
- Page 31 and 32:
2187received death threats a few we
- Page 33 and 34:
2189ference, but on August 15 (the
- Page 35 and 36:
2191about 125 refugees and asylum s
- Page 37 and 38: 2193Section 5. Discrimination Based
- Page 39 and 40: 2195Indigenous People.—Tribal peo
- Page 41 and 42: 2197ers have the right to strike in
- Page 43 and 44: 2199sites, carry fruit, vegetables,
- Page 45 and 46: 2201based in the Department of Wome
- Page 47 and 48: 2203turn to the country, beat them,
- Page 49 and 50: 2205antinational crimes, including
- Page 51 and 52: 2207order to be eligible for nomina
- Page 53 and 54: 2209Children.—The Government has
- Page 55 and 56: 2211resentatives of the Nepalese Go
- Page 57 and 58: 2213east; continued detention throu
- Page 59 and 60: 2215Accountability remains a seriou
- Page 61 and 62: 2217The Disturbed Areas Act has bee
- Page 63 and 64: 2219lice courtyard in Punjab, appar
- Page 65 and 66: 2221the NLFT was retaliating for a
- Page 67 and 68: 2223The Ministry of Home Affairs re
- Page 69 and 70: 2225One of the suspects subsequentl
- Page 71 and 72: 2227human rights organization. The
- Page 73 and 74: 2229sions would seriously affect hu
- Page 75 and 76: 2231ment. There are effective chann
- Page 77 and 78: 2233three Border Security Force mem
- Page 79 and 80: 2235fice owned by an NGO at Konung
- Page 81 and 82: 2237nated, but many of its members
- Page 83 and 84: 2239ever, no further information wa
- Page 85 and 86: 2241The Tamil Nadu government provi
- Page 87: 2243According to HRW, on April 20,
- Page 91 and 92: 2247also concerned about the lack o
- Page 93 and 94: 2249rights of the mentally ill and
- Page 95 and 96: 2251from women and children, gather
- Page 97 and 98: 2253The burning of churches continu
- Page 99 and 100: 2255suspected of belonging to an up
- Page 101 and 102: 2257Bonded labor, the result of a p
- Page 103 and 104: 2259ment officials more aware of th
- Page 105 and 106: 2261and ‘‘inhuman treatment.’
- Page 107 and 108: 2263illustration of the consequence
- Page 109 and 110: 2265The Government has permitted pr
- Page 111 and 112: 2267lations governing Internet acce
- Page 113 and 114: 2269Women traditionally have played
- Page 115 and 116: 2271In 1997 the Government for the
- Page 117 and 118: 2273pali Congress Party flags. A bo
- Page 119 and 120: 2275The authorities are more likely
- Page 121 and 122: 2277of the monarch who allegedly ki
- Page 123 and 124: 2279the Government generally does n
- Page 125 and 126: 2281areas along the country’s bor
- Page 127 and 128: 2283groups. Nevertheless, converts
- Page 129 and 130: 2285e. Acceptable Conditions of Wor
- Page 131 and 132: 2287Provisional Constitutional Orde
- Page 133 and 134: 2289assailants killed a leader of t
- Page 135 and 136: 2291ditions, Sindh Inspector Genera
- Page 137 and 138: 2293then another FIR is activated a
- Page 139 and 140:
2295Farooq Sattar was arrested by o
- Page 141 and 142:
2297case pending before any other s
- Page 143 and 144:
2299The Hudood ordinances criminali
- Page 145 and 146:
2301The Penal Code mandates the dea
- Page 147 and 148:
2303cast on television; however, so
- Page 149 and 150:
2305which stipulated a sentence of
- Page 151 and 152:
2307ties at times prevent political
- Page 153 and 154:
2309fair. Nawaz Sharif’s Pakistan
- Page 155 and 156:
2311sioners review blasphemy cases
- Page 157 and 158:
2313of Shari’a (see Section 1.c.)
- Page 159 and 160:
2315late head of the Board of Inter
- Page 161 and 162:
2317Courts also may order that chil
- Page 163 and 164:
2319portedly spared the two Muslim
- Page 165 and 166:
2321these services to a few core ar
- Page 167 and 168:
2323centers and 146 larger centers
- Page 169 and 170:
2325administration in Multan approa
- Page 171 and 172:
2327fore their mandates expired, se
- Page 173 and 174:
2329moved many detainees to another
- Page 175 and 176:
2331during the year and in previous
- Page 177 and 178:
2333The LTTE was responsible for a
- Page 179 and 180:
2335persons tried on criminal charg
- Page 181 and 182:
2337the other by the LTTE. The bord
- Page 183 and 184:
2339thor, remained subject to gover
- Page 185 and 186:
2341bombs exploded in the hall of t
- Page 187 and 188:
2343September 29, the Center for Mo
- Page 189 and 190:
2345a strong commitment to children
- Page 191 and 192:
2347All workers, other than civil s
- Page 193:
23491999, the LTTE began a program