2332fied the International <strong>Committee</strong> of the Red Cross (ICRC) of any new security forcesprisoners since 1994.c. Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment.—Despite legal prohibitions, the security forces and police continue to torture and mistreatpersons in police custody and prisons, particularly Tamils suspected of supportingthe LTTE. Suspected criminals also apparently were tortured. Several childrenreportedly have been tortured in detention during the last few years. The 1994Convention Against Torture Act (CATA) made torture a punishable offense. Underthe CATA, torture is defined as a specific crime, the High Court has jurisdictionover violations, and criminal conviction carries a 7-year minimum sentence. However,according to a 1999 AI report, the CATA does not implement several provisionsof the U.N. Convention; this results in torture being prohibited under specificcircumstances and allowed under others. Consequently torture continues with relativeimpunity. In addition, the PTA makes confessions obtained under any circumstance,including by torture, admissible in court. The Working Group on Enforcedor Involuntary Disappearances and other human rights organizations citedthe PTA as a major factor contributing to torture of prisoners.The Government is developing regulations to prosecute and punish military andpolice personnel responsible for torture. The Interparliamentary Permanent Standing<strong>Committee</strong> and its Interministerial Working Group on Human Rights Issueshave begun tracking criminal investigations of torture. By year’s end, there were146 cases under investigation. In addition the Government also ceased paying finesincurred by security force personnel found guilty in proceedings of the offense. Securityforce personnel have been fined under civil statutes for engaging in torture. Accordingto the Attorney General’s office, by year’s end, 8 members of the securityforces and police had been prosecuted under criminal statutes, but none of the caseshad come to conclusion. Members of the security forces continued to torture andmistreat detainees and other prisoners, particularly during interrogation.Methods of torture included electric shock, beatings (especially on the soles of thefeet), suspension by the wrists or feet in contorted positions, burning, slamming testiclesin desk drawers, and near drownings. In other cases, victims must remain inunnatural positions for extended periods, or they have bags laced with insecticide,chili powder, or gasoline placed over their heads. Detainees have reported brokenbones and other serious injuries as a result of their mistreatment. There were noreports of rape in detention during the year.Medical examination determined that officers of the Counter-Subversive Unit ofthe Vavuniya police beat and burned with cigarettes a Tamil man arrested inMarch. Police at Kantale, near Trincomalee, arrested and tortured five youngTamils in June; one died as a result (see Section 1.a.). In December the bodies ofseven Tamils who had been tortured and killed by the army in Mirusuvil were exhumedafter one person escaped and notified authorities. A commissioned officerand eight soldiers were arrested, and at year’s end, an inquiry continued (see Sections1.a. and 1.b.). Torture appeared more prevalent in rural areas than inColombo.Under fundamental rights provisions in the Constitution, torture victims may filecivil suit for compensation in the High Courts or Supreme Court. Courts have grantedawards ranging from approximately $175 (14,200 rupees) to $2,280 (182,500 rupees).In February the Colombo high court ordered compensation of $625 (50,000 rupees)to a young man beaten in police custody in Vavuniya and Colombo in 1999.In August the Supreme Court ordered $1,250 (100,000 rupees) in compensation fora Tamil man tortured in December 1999 at an army camp near Batticaloa. However,most cases take 2 years or more to move through the courts, and NGO’s who representtorture victims complained that the new Supreme Court Chief Justice appointedin September 1999 grants hearings in only the most egregious cases.At the invitation of the Government, the United Nations <strong>Committee</strong> on Torturesent a five-person mission to Colombo in late August to determine whether a systematicpattern of torture exists in the country and, if so, to make recommendationsfor eliminating the practice. By year’s end, the mission had not submitted its confidentialreport to President Kumaratunga.Progovernment Tamil militants, directly responsible to the security forces, alsoengaged in torture. The PLOTE in Vavuniya has drawn the most criticism for routinelytorturing its opponents, and during the year, its members reportedly burnedwith cigarettes those who refused to pay protection money. Security forces havedone little to stop this practice.The LTTE reportedly used torture on a routine basis. Security force prisoners releasedby the LTTE stated that they had been subjected to torture, including beinghung upside down and beaten, having pins inserted under their fingernails, andbeing burned by hot rods.VerDate 11-MAY-2000 13:46 Sep 20, 2001 Jkt 071555 PO 00000 Frm 00176 Fmt 6601 Sfmt 6621 F:\WORK\COUNTRYR\S71555\71555.036 HINTREL1 PsN: HINTREL1
2333The LTTE was responsible for a number of bomb attacks during the year, whichkilled and injured dozens of civilians (see Sections 1.a. and 1.g.).Prison conditions generally are poor and do not meet minimum internationalstandards because of overcrowding and lack of sanitary facilities. An increase in detentionsassociated with the war with the LTTE caused a significant deteriorationin already poor conditions in short-term detention centers and in undeclared detentioncenters run by progovernment Tamil groups (see Section 1.d.).The Government permitted representatives from the ICRC to visit approximately160 places of detention. The HRC also visited over 2,000 police stations and over500 detention facilities by year’s end (see Section 1.d.).Conditions also are poor in LTTE-run detention facilities. Some former prisonersreported being handcuffed and shackled during much of their captivity.The LTTE permits the ICRC to visit detainees in the Vanni regularly (see Section1.d.). The ICRC provided medical attention and helped negotiate the release of fourservicemen held in Mallavi following a hunger strike in February (see Section 1.b.).d. Arbitrary Arrest, Detention, or Exile.—Arbitrary arrest and detention are problems.Under the law, authorities must inform an arrested person of the reason forarrest and bring that person before a magistrate within 24 hours. In practice personsdetained generally appear before a magistrate within a few days of arrest. Themagistrate may authorize bail or order continued pretrial detention for up to 3months or longer. However, under the ER and the PTA, security forces may detainsuspects for extended periods of time without court approval. The ER, in force periodicallysince 1979 and in force island-wide since August 1998, allows pretrial detentionfor a maximum of four consecutive 3-month periods. The ER gives securityforces broad powers for arrest and detention without charge or the right to judicialreview. New ER provisions published in May lengthen to a year the period for whichauthorities may order individuals to remain at home or otherwise have their freedomof association and movement limited. The new ER provisions also permit policeto hold individuals for up to 90 days to investigate suspected offenses, although thepolice must present detainees to a court within 30 days to record the detention. Thecourt can order a further 6 months detention. The ER states that detention orders‘‘shall not be called in question in any court on any ground whatsoever,’’ which maycontradict an individual’s constitutional right to petition the Supreme Court to redressfundamental rights violations.As required under the ER, the army generally turned over those that it arrestedto the police within 24 hours, although the police and the army did not always issuearrest receipts or notify the HRC within 48 hours. The HRC has a legal mandateto visit those arrested, and police generally respected this in areas outside of theconflict. Due to censorship and infrequent access, observers could not determine thestate of affairs in the north and the east.Despite Government announcements that it would close all secret detention centers,there were continued credible reports that the military held persons for shortamounts of time in smaller camps for interrogation before transferring them to declaredplaces of detention. This procedure, which allegedly occurred on the Jaffnapeninsula, in Vavuniya, and in the east (see Section 1.c.), did not comply with requirementsto notify the HRC of arrests and to issue arrest receipts. The militarymaintained the detainees were ‘‘in transit,’’ and claimed they did not violate the detainees’rights.Large-scale arrests of Tamils continued during the year; these arrests were particularlyprevalent after LTTE bombings, when many young Tamils were detainedor arrested on suspicion of being LTTE cadres or sympathizers. The Government detainedmore than 2,819 persons under the ER and PTA from January to August 31,a higher number than that for all of 1999. Many detentions occurred during operationsagainst the LTTE. Most detentions lasted several days to several months.The number of prisoners held at any given moment under the ER and the PTA consistentlyremained close to 2,000. Hundreds of Tamils indicted under the PTA remainedwithout bail awaiting trial, some for more than 2 years. The high courtsheld hearings on 1,000 cases under the PTA or ER during the year. Many suchcases drag on for years. On January 7 and 15, security forces detained several thousandTamils in Colombo and the surrounding suburbs in ‘‘cordon and search’’ operationsmeant to find LTTE cadres after suicide bomb attacks (see Section 1.a.). Althoughauthorities eventually arrested fewer than 100 persons, many of thoserounded up for questioning spent hours in detention, often without access to sanitaryfacilities. On March 18, police at a Colombo checkpoint detained and publiclystrip-searched one woman, who turned out to be Sinhalese, on suspicion of beingan LTTE suicide bomber. On May 30, police detained hundreds of Tamils in downtownColombo for almost 5 hours of questioning. Approximately 50 of the detaineeswere taken for photographing and further questioning. In addition those arrested,VerDate 11-MAY-2000 13:46 Sep 20, 2001 Jkt 071555 PO 00000 Frm 00177 Fmt 6601 Sfmt 6621 F:\WORK\COUNTRYR\S71555\71555.036 HINTREL1 PsN: HINTREL1
- Page 7 and 8:
2163All factions probably hold poli
- Page 9 and 10:
2165and unexploded ordnance. Nevert
- Page 11 and 12:
2167bade non-Muslims from living in
- Page 13 and 14:
2169tion of most of the country. Go
- Page 15 and 16:
2171Women accused of adultery also
- Page 17 and 18:
2173violations of the rights to edu
- Page 19 and 20:
2175paper and firewood, shining sho
- Page 21 and 22:
2177ister made remarks implying tha
- Page 23 and 24:
2179central unit of its student win
- Page 25 and 26:
2181humiliating, painful punishment
- Page 27 and 28:
2183ment of the split verdict in th
- Page 29 and 30:
2185The court system has two levels
- Page 31 and 32:
2187received death threats a few we
- Page 33 and 34:
2189ference, but on August 15 (the
- Page 35 and 36:
2191about 125 refugees and asylum s
- Page 37 and 38:
2193Section 5. Discrimination Based
- Page 39 and 40:
2195Indigenous People.—Tribal peo
- Page 41 and 42:
2197ers have the right to strike in
- Page 43 and 44:
2199sites, carry fruit, vegetables,
- Page 45 and 46:
2201based in the Department of Wome
- Page 47 and 48:
2203turn to the country, beat them,
- Page 49 and 50:
2205antinational crimes, including
- Page 51 and 52:
2207order to be eligible for nomina
- Page 53 and 54:
2209Children.—The Government has
- Page 55 and 56:
2211resentatives of the Nepalese Go
- Page 57 and 58:
2213east; continued detention throu
- Page 59 and 60:
2215Accountability remains a seriou
- Page 61 and 62:
2217The Disturbed Areas Act has bee
- Page 63 and 64:
2219lice courtyard in Punjab, appar
- Page 65 and 66:
2221the NLFT was retaliating for a
- Page 67 and 68:
2223The Ministry of Home Affairs re
- Page 69 and 70:
2225One of the suspects subsequentl
- Page 71 and 72:
2227human rights organization. The
- Page 73 and 74:
2229sions would seriously affect hu
- Page 75 and 76:
2231ment. There are effective chann
- Page 77 and 78:
2233three Border Security Force mem
- Page 79 and 80:
2235fice owned by an NGO at Konung
- Page 81 and 82:
2237nated, but many of its members
- Page 83 and 84:
2239ever, no further information wa
- Page 85 and 86:
2241The Tamil Nadu government provi
- Page 87 and 88:
2243According to HRW, on April 20,
- Page 89 and 90:
2245and branded her with hot iron r
- Page 91 and 92:
2247also concerned about the lack o
- Page 93 and 94:
2249rights of the mentally ill and
- Page 95 and 96:
2251from women and children, gather
- Page 97 and 98:
2253The burning of churches continu
- Page 99 and 100:
2255suspected of belonging to an up
- Page 101 and 102:
2257Bonded labor, the result of a p
- Page 103 and 104:
2259ment officials more aware of th
- Page 105 and 106:
2261and ‘‘inhuman treatment.’
- Page 107 and 108:
2263illustration of the consequence
- Page 109 and 110:
2265The Government has permitted pr
- Page 111 and 112:
2267lations governing Internet acce
- Page 113 and 114:
2269Women traditionally have played
- Page 115 and 116:
2271In 1997 the Government for the
- Page 117 and 118:
2273pali Congress Party flags. A bo
- Page 119 and 120:
2275The authorities are more likely
- Page 121 and 122:
2277of the monarch who allegedly ki
- Page 123 and 124:
2279the Government generally does n
- Page 125 and 126: 2281areas along the country’s bor
- Page 127 and 128: 2283groups. Nevertheless, converts
- Page 129 and 130: 2285e. Acceptable Conditions of Wor
- Page 131 and 132: 2287Provisional Constitutional Orde
- Page 133 and 134: 2289assailants killed a leader of t
- Page 135 and 136: 2291ditions, Sindh Inspector Genera
- Page 137 and 138: 2293then another FIR is activated a
- Page 139 and 140: 2295Farooq Sattar was arrested by o
- Page 141 and 142: 2297case pending before any other s
- Page 143 and 144: 2299The Hudood ordinances criminali
- Page 145 and 146: 2301The Penal Code mandates the dea
- Page 147 and 148: 2303cast on television; however, so
- Page 149 and 150: 2305which stipulated a sentence of
- Page 151 and 152: 2307ties at times prevent political
- Page 153 and 154: 2309fair. Nawaz Sharif’s Pakistan
- Page 155 and 156: 2311sioners review blasphemy cases
- Page 157 and 158: 2313of Shari’a (see Section 1.c.)
- Page 159 and 160: 2315late head of the Board of Inter
- Page 161 and 162: 2317Courts also may order that chil
- Page 163 and 164: 2319portedly spared the two Muslim
- Page 165 and 166: 2321these services to a few core ar
- Page 167 and 168: 2323centers and 146 larger centers
- Page 169 and 170: 2325administration in Multan approa
- Page 171 and 172: 2327fore their mandates expired, se
- Page 173 and 174: 2329moved many detainees to another
- Page 175: 2331during the year and in previous
- Page 179 and 180: 2335persons tried on criminal charg
- Page 181 and 182: 2337the other by the LTTE. The bord
- Page 183 and 184: 2339thor, remained subject to gover
- Page 185 and 186: 2341bombs exploded in the hall of t
- Page 187 and 188: 2343September 29, the Center for Mo
- Page 189 and 190: 2345a strong commitment to children
- Page 191 and 192: 2347All workers, other than civil s
- Page 193: 23491999, the LTTE began a program