03.12.2012 Views

SCHRIFTENREIHE Institut für Pflanzenernährung und Bodenkunde ...

SCHRIFTENREIHE Institut für Pflanzenernährung und Bodenkunde ...

SCHRIFTENREIHE Institut für Pflanzenernährung und Bodenkunde ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Chapter 5 Modeling Grazing Effects on Coupled Water and Heat Fluxes in Inner Mongolia Grassland<br />

each site three replicate profiles were installed and connected to one solar<br />

powered automatic data-logger. Moreover, an in situ micrometeorological station<br />

was installed to record precipitation and other variables necessary to estimate<br />

the reference evapotranspiration (ET) from the FAO Penman-Monteith equation<br />

(Allen et al., 1998). Some missing data, especially in 2004 when our<br />

experiments began, were filled with data from the weather station of IMGERS (3<br />

km away) and calibrated to the local conditions. To calibrate the modeled<br />

bo<strong>und</strong>ary condition, weighing mini-lysimeter experiments were conducted to<br />

partition soil evaporation (E) from ET. Lysimeters were designed by inserting<br />

PVC tubes (20.0 cm long, 5.4 cm diameter) into the gro<strong>und</strong> and sealing them at<br />

the bottom. At each site, three replicates were installed at selected locations for<br />

both representative grass cover and bare soil surface, respectively. Weighing<br />

was conducted bihourly by an electronic balance where the corresponding water<br />

loss is referred to as ET for grass-covered gro<strong>und</strong> and as E for bare gro<strong>und</strong>,<br />

respectively. The difference between ET and E is consequently calculated<br />

considering the vegetal coverage and referred to as transpiration (Tp). Crop<br />

parameters, such as vegetation coverage, leaf area index (LAI), and plant height,<br />

were taken from vegetation measurements (Gao, 2007). In addition, also the<br />

residue coverage and weight were recorded. To determine the root length<br />

density, root samples were taken with a soil root auger and soil cores were<br />

separated into five depths of 0-10, 10-20, 20-50, 50-70, and 70-100 cm.<br />

Undisturbed soil samples were taken from four layers at 4-8, 18-22, 30-34,<br />

and 40-44 cm depths (Table 1). Soil texture was determined by pipette method,<br />

and total C-content was measured coulometrically. Water retention functions<br />

were determined with a ceramic pressure plate assembly by stepwise<br />

desaturating initially saturated samples at equilibrium matric potentials of -1, -3,<br />

-6, -15, -30, and -1500 kPa. Soil bulk density was determined after oven-drying.<br />

Finally, saturated hydraulic conductivity (Ks) was determined with a falling head<br />

permeameter (Hartge and Horn, 1999).<br />

Water and heat flow equations<br />

Numerical Modeling<br />

89

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!