SCHRIFTENREIHE Institut für Pflanzenernährung und Bodenkunde ...
SCHRIFTENREIHE Institut für Pflanzenernährung und Bodenkunde ...
SCHRIFTENREIHE Institut für Pflanzenernährung und Bodenkunde ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Chapter 2 Spatial variability of soil properties affected by grazing intensity in Inner Mongolia grassland<br />
and in a water surplus in the topsoil layer after rainfall, which in turn decreases<br />
aggregate strength in the topsoil.<br />
Plant available water capacity may be reduced by soil compaction. Reduced<br />
plant available water combined with short vegetation periods in the semi-arid<br />
grassland limits plant growth and reduces the input of litter, consequently<br />
influence the storage of organic carbon in soil. Particularly upper soil layers<br />
show high concentration of soil organic carbon and are first affected by<br />
management (Kelly et al., 1996). High concentration of organic carbon,<br />
especially when it is rich in hydrophobic compo<strong>und</strong>s, restrains water from<br />
entering into the soil by increasing the water repellency (Ritsema, 1996).<br />
Although this is an important “indirect” effect of grazing on the soil infiltrability it<br />
has not yet been well described and quantified.<br />
Soil properties have often been reported to show a strong spatial<br />
dependence (Shouse et al., 1995; Lophaven et al., 2006). The spatial<br />
dependency is commonly characterized and quantified by geostatistical methods<br />
such as autocorrelation and variogram analysis. Such spatial analysis is<br />
necessary to perform so<strong>und</strong> interpolation when producing contour maps and to<br />
simultaneously provide an estimate of the variance of the interpolated values<br />
(Goovaerts, 1998). Kriging, an interpolation procedure, which provides best<br />
linear and unbiased estimation, has been universally applied in the<br />
environmental sciences to analyze spatial variability and to resolve site-specific<br />
problems, e.g. with respect to SWC (Goovaerts and Sonnet, 1993; Famiglietti et<br />
al., 1998; Western et al., 1998, Buttafuocoa et al., 2005), shear strength (Cassel<br />
and Nelson, 1985; Júnior et al., 2006) and water repellency (Gerke et al., 2001).<br />
The correlations between soil properties are very complex, especially on<br />
plot or regional scale. These characteristics make it very hard to interpret the<br />
various studies and to predict the relevant processes and mechanisms (Ludovisi<br />
et al., 2005). Many attempts have been made to establish the relation among<br />
texture, structure, aggregate stability, bulk density and organic matter content of<br />
the soil and its resistance to water infiltration. Dekker and Ritsema (1994) did not<br />
find a significant relationship between the persistence of potential water<br />
13