SCHRIFTENREIHE Institut für Pflanzenernährung und Bodenkunde ...
SCHRIFTENREIHE Institut für Pflanzenernährung und Bodenkunde ...
SCHRIFTENREIHE Institut für Pflanzenernährung und Bodenkunde ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Chapter 2 Spatial variability of soil properties affected by grazing intensity in Inner Mongolia grassland<br />
Table 2.3. Descriptive statistics of Ln (WDPT) measured on three sampling soil water<br />
statuses in 2004.<br />
Treatment<br />
Sampling soil<br />
water<br />
statuses<br />
Min. Max. Mean SD CV Skewness Kurtosis<br />
UG 79 Dry 0.47 3.44 1.93 0.69 35.46 0.20 -0.04<br />
Wet 0.90 2.52 1.34 0.25 18.01 1.26 3.36<br />
Medium 1.11 5.45 3.16 1.01 31.84 0.05 -0.75<br />
UG 99 Dry 1.01 4.01 2.07 0.70 33.62 0.57 -0.11<br />
Wet 1.12 2.36 1.48 0.26 17.36 1.11 1.51<br />
Medium 1.74 5.99 3.56 0.82 22.92 0.40 1.24<br />
WG Dry 0.38 2.36 0.97 0.47 47.94 0.96 0.49<br />
Wet 1.15 2.73 1.93 0.33 17.25 0.30 -0.17<br />
Medium 1.13 4.98 3.02 0.84 27.72 0 -0.40<br />
CG Dry 0.36 3.43 1.09 0.63 58.07 1.47 2.36<br />
Wet 0.59 4.38 2.60 0.72 27.74 0.01 0.15<br />
Medium 1 2.63 1.78 0.33 18.54 0.09 -0.01<br />
HG Dry - - - - - - -<br />
Wet 0.56 2.34 1.24 0.44 35.13 0.62 -0.40<br />
Medium 0.80 3.24 1.47 0.50 34.31 1.47 2.16<br />
Min.: Minimum (s); Max.: Maximum (s); SD: Standard deviation (s); CV: Coefficient of<br />
variation (%); -: No data available.<br />
continuous grazing might lead to a more homogeneous spatial distribution of SS<br />
owing to the animal trampling. However, this trend was interrupted for very high<br />
stocking rate (HG) where spatial dependence increased again at the heavy<br />
grazing plot. A similar trend was also observed for the range values, which firstly<br />
increased and then decreased with increasing grazing intensity. This trend<br />
implies that heavy grazing initiated strong compaction effects with a partial<br />
heterogeneity likely caused by non-random repeated trampling. Similar to that of<br />
the SS, the order of spatial dependence for WDPT was higher in the ungrazed<br />
plots than in the grazed plots and the lowest in CG (Table 6). This result<br />
indicated an interaction of organic compo<strong>und</strong>s and cohesion is to be assumed<br />
and hence an influence of the vegetation on soil surface strength (r = -0.68**,<br />
21