03.12.2012 Views

SCHRIFTENREIHE Institut für Pflanzenernährung und Bodenkunde ...

SCHRIFTENREIHE Institut für Pflanzenernährung und Bodenkunde ...

SCHRIFTENREIHE Institut für Pflanzenernährung und Bodenkunde ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Chapter 2 Spatial variability of soil properties affected by grazing intensity in Inner Mongolia grassland<br />

Table 2.3. Descriptive statistics of Ln (WDPT) measured on three sampling soil water<br />

statuses in 2004.<br />

Treatment<br />

Sampling soil<br />

water<br />

statuses<br />

Min. Max. Mean SD CV Skewness Kurtosis<br />

UG 79 Dry 0.47 3.44 1.93 0.69 35.46 0.20 -0.04<br />

Wet 0.90 2.52 1.34 0.25 18.01 1.26 3.36<br />

Medium 1.11 5.45 3.16 1.01 31.84 0.05 -0.75<br />

UG 99 Dry 1.01 4.01 2.07 0.70 33.62 0.57 -0.11<br />

Wet 1.12 2.36 1.48 0.26 17.36 1.11 1.51<br />

Medium 1.74 5.99 3.56 0.82 22.92 0.40 1.24<br />

WG Dry 0.38 2.36 0.97 0.47 47.94 0.96 0.49<br />

Wet 1.15 2.73 1.93 0.33 17.25 0.30 -0.17<br />

Medium 1.13 4.98 3.02 0.84 27.72 0 -0.40<br />

CG Dry 0.36 3.43 1.09 0.63 58.07 1.47 2.36<br />

Wet 0.59 4.38 2.60 0.72 27.74 0.01 0.15<br />

Medium 1 2.63 1.78 0.33 18.54 0.09 -0.01<br />

HG Dry - - - - - - -<br />

Wet 0.56 2.34 1.24 0.44 35.13 0.62 -0.40<br />

Medium 0.80 3.24 1.47 0.50 34.31 1.47 2.16<br />

Min.: Minimum (s); Max.: Maximum (s); SD: Standard deviation (s); CV: Coefficient of<br />

variation (%); -: No data available.<br />

continuous grazing might lead to a more homogeneous spatial distribution of SS<br />

owing to the animal trampling. However, this trend was interrupted for very high<br />

stocking rate (HG) where spatial dependence increased again at the heavy<br />

grazing plot. A similar trend was also observed for the range values, which firstly<br />

increased and then decreased with increasing grazing intensity. This trend<br />

implies that heavy grazing initiated strong compaction effects with a partial<br />

heterogeneity likely caused by non-random repeated trampling. Similar to that of<br />

the SS, the order of spatial dependence for WDPT was higher in the ungrazed<br />

plots than in the grazed plots and the lowest in CG (Table 6). This result<br />

indicated an interaction of organic compo<strong>und</strong>s and cohesion is to be assumed<br />

and hence an influence of the vegetation on soil surface strength (r = -0.68**,<br />

21

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!