03.12.2012 Views

SCHRIFTENREIHE Institut für Pflanzenernährung und Bodenkunde ...

SCHRIFTENREIHE Institut für Pflanzenernährung und Bodenkunde ...

SCHRIFTENREIHE Institut für Pflanzenernährung und Bodenkunde ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Chapter 5 Modeling Grazing Effects on Coupled Water and Heat Fluxes in Inner Mongolia Grassland<br />

six unknown parameters (θr, θs, α, n, Ks, and L). Hence, our three-layer soil<br />

profile (second and third depths were combined in one layer) may have as many<br />

as 18 unknown variables. To improve the optimization efficiency, the parameters<br />

θs, α, n, and Ks were simultaneously optimized in all layers with other<br />

parameters (i.e., θr and L) constant using time series of observations of θw for<br />

each depth. For a preliminary sensitive analysis, we also mixed the simulation 1<br />

and simulation 2, i.e., combined θr, θs, α, and n from LDP but Ks from NN<br />

(LDP-NN; simulation 4) and combined Ks from LDP but θr, θs, α, and n from NN<br />

(LDP+NN; simulation 5), respectively. The model was calibrated in 2004 and<br />

validated in 2005 and 2006. Optimizing efficiency, as well as model efficiency<br />

was evaluated by the root mean square errors (RMSE):<br />

RMSE<br />

=<br />

N<br />

1 2<br />

N ∑ Pi<br />

− Oi<br />

)<br />

i=<br />

1<br />

( [8]<br />

where N is the number of observations and Pi and Oi are the simulated and<br />

measured values, respectively.<br />

Table 5.1. Summary of simulation approaches used in model.<br />

Simulation<br />

approach<br />

Abbreviation<br />

Description<br />

Simulation 1 LDP<br />

Laboratory-derived hydraulic parameter from soil core,<br />

fitted by RETC software<br />

Simulation 2 NN<br />

Neutral network values based on soil texture<br />

and bulk density analysis, predicted by ROSETTA<br />

Simulation 3 Inverse Simulation with inverse model<br />

Simulation 4 LDP-NN Simulation with Ks from NN and measured θr, θs, α, n<br />

Simulation 5 LDP+NN Simulation with θr, θs, α, n from NN and measured Ks<br />

RESULTS<br />

Soil Texture, Bulk Density and Carbon Content<br />

At all four sites soil texture is coarser in the subsoil (18-22 cm) than in the<br />

topmost soil layer (4-8 cm) (Table 2). Also bulk density increases from the first to<br />

the second depth, while total C-content generally decreases (except at the<br />

second layer of UG 99) with increasing soil depth. Sand content is the highest in<br />

HG and the lowest in WG. Compared to UG 99 and WG, a higher sand content in<br />

93

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!