13.07.2015 Views

Untitled - MendelNet 2013 - Mendelova zemědělská a lesnická ...

Untitled - MendelNet 2013 - Mendelova zemědělská a lesnická ...

Untitled - MendelNet 2013 - Mendelova zemědělská a lesnická ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

MENDELNET <strong>2013</strong>number) were performed in an accredited laboratory (UKZUZ Brno) using certified analyticalmethods.Fig. 1 Experimental site with 24 open-top chambers and experimental plots inside chamberRESULT AND DISCUSSIONThe assessment of the effects of elevated [CO 2 ] in the interaction with the effects of nitrogennutrition and drought stress revealed similar results for both, aboveground biomass and grain yield.The results indicate that the elevated [CO 2 ] increases the yield of aboveground biomass and grainyield (Fig. 2). However, this effect is modified by the effect of drought and nitrogen nutrition. Dueto drought the grain yield decreases for all treatments, but in case of elevated [CO 2 ], this decreaseis lower, in particular at a sufficient level of nitrogen nutrition. Higher level of nitrogen nutrition ingeneral increases the stimulatory effect of [CO 2 ] on yield. Nitrogen deficiency is one of the causesof feedback regulation of photosynthesis at elevated [CO 2 ], becomes the limiting factor, andtherefore the effect of increased [CO 2 ] under these conditions is usually low. Reich et al. (2006)showed in grassland ecosystem that elevated [CO 2 ] stimulated plant biomass much less underambient than enriched N supply. Because these limitations to productivity resulting from theinsufficient availability of N are widespread in both unmanaged and managed vegetation, theyassumed that soil N supply is probably an important constraint on global terrestrial responses toelevated [CO 2 ]. Higher yield response to elevated [CO 2 ] in dry conditions is probably due to theinfluence of [CO 2 ] on stomatal closure and thereby increasing the water use efficiency. The effectof [CO 2 ] on reduction in stomatal conductance and decrease in canopy evapotranspiration wasreviewed by Leakey et al. (2009).14 drywetGrain yield (t.ha-1)121086ACEC42N- N+Nitrogen nutritionN- N+Fig. 2 Effect of CO 2 concentration, nitrogen nutrition and drought stress on grain yield. AC(ambient CO 2 concentration; 385 μmol mol -1 ), EC (elevated CO 2 concentration; 700 μmol mol -1 ),N- (unfertilized with nitrogen), N+ (fertilized with nitrogen 200 kg ha -1 ), wet (ambientprecipitation), dry (drought stress). Means (columns) and 95% confidence intervals (error bars)are presented (n=3).671 | P age

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!