Rights and urged again the CubanGovernment to make real the commitmentto human rights it has demonstratedthrough the signing of these two humanrights covenants”.c. It asserts again that it will continue thedialogue with the three sectors of the Cubansociety: government, opposition and civilsociety. It mentions and differentiates for thefirst time, these three social actors:“The Council confirmed its renewedcommitment to and the relevance ofthe Common Position of 1996, andreaffirmed its determination to pursue adialogue with the Cuban authorities aswell as with representatives of civilsociety and democratic opposition, inaccordance with EU policies, in order topromote respect for human rights andreal progress towards a pluralistdemocracy”.d. It underlines that it will offer supportfor a pacific change and asks theCuban Government to grant freedomof information and expression,including the access to Internet:“The Council underlined that the EU willcontinue to offer to all sectors of societypractical support towards peaceful changein Cuba. The EU also reiterated its call onthe Cuban Government to grant freedom ofinformation and expression including accessto the Internet and invited the CubanGovernment to cooperate on this matter”.e. It asserts again that it will maintainthe contacts with the democraticopposition. It thus recognizes, oncemore, as opponets, the ones theCuban Government calls mercenariesand traitors:“The Council reaffirmed that its policy forEU contacts with the democratic oppositionremains valid. During high level visits,human rights issues should always beaddressed; when appropriate, meetings withthe democratic opposition will be part of highlevel visits”.f. It establishes a time and a content for theevaluation of this process of politicaldialogue and it underlines again paragraphtwo about the respect for human rights and theliberation of political prisoners:“On the occasion of the annual review of theCommon Position, the Council will proceed inJune 2009 to an evaluation of its relationswith Cuba including the effectiveness of thepolitical dialogue process. Following that date,the dialogue will continue if the Councildecides that it has been effective, takinginto account in particular the elementscontained in para 2 above".We consider that these Conclusions of theEuropean Union have placed in the center of thematter, in a clear and reiterated way, the twofoundations that cannot be waived and mustrule the international relationships in today’sworld: the respect for human rights and thecooperation for development. In that order andwith that priority.We appreciate these Conclusions as a lesson ofpacient international politics and maximumrespect and tolerance until trying everydiplomatic resource when dealing with systemsthat are not attached to democratic norms.Norms that are inclusive and defend the HumanRights. Norms that are internationallyrecognized, even by Cuba itself.These Conclusions are good for the communityof european nations: Once more they havegiven an opportunity to civilized dialogue. Agood opportunity for the Cuban people: Oncemore we receive the attention, theacknowledgement of our citizen sovereigntyand the solidarity for a democratic pluralistchange on this part of the internationalcommunity. And a good opportunity for theCuban government: Once more it has beenrespected, considered as a valid party for apolitical comprehensive dialogue, open,reciprocal, non-discriminatory, and for the seekof tangible results and furthermore it receivesthe opportunity to integrate itself to theinstruments of cooperation for developmentthat the European Union offers.This has been the gesture and the letter. A signof respect and confidence for the new Cubangovernment as well as for the democraticopposition and the civil society. Now we have toexpect the answers and the facts from theCuban Government and from the very EuropeanUnion when putting into practice theseEdiciones <strong>Convivencia</strong>Pinar del Río. 201223
Conclusions from its Council. We think thatthis should be a patient process, to beevaluated. A frank, faithful, transparent andparticipatory process for the Cuban and forthe European governments, as well as for thedemocratic opposition and the Cuban Civilsociety that should be accuratelly informedand taken into account, and they should lookfor and win a space by themselves, adignified and significant space in thisdialogue, according to the quality of theircontributions, possibilities and abilities.We hope that the Cuban government thinkmore about an inclusive Cuba than aboutitself; resume this high level dialogue withthe political pragmatism and the diligencerequired by the present situation in ourcountry and in the world; attached more andmore to the real needs and to the inalienablerights of each Cuban without discredit allwho have earned credibilty and withoutexcluding the ones who should be included;acknowledge the independent Civil society asthe receiver of its proposals and at the sametime as a valid party to evaluate itsadministration.We hope the democratic opposition thatwishes to stay in the country, as recognizedby the European Union, think more about aninclusive Cuba than about itself; identifieswith realism and transparency what shouldbe changed, but above all, devise, arrangeand look for the more adecuate means andrythm to propose how, when, with whom andfrom where those changes will be done. Theperspective of the future should come firstthan the laments over the past. Theproposals for the present should bepragmatic and ethical, known and shared bythe greatest number of citizens. Thedemocratic opposition should recognize theCivil society as the receiver of its proposalsand at the same time as a valid party toevaluate its steps.We hope the Civil society, well differentiatedand recognized by the European Union,which wants to recognize itself as differentfrom the government and from the partidistopposition, starts its civic education, itsreconstruction from its foundations, itsorganization in a plural, multicolor, nonpartidist,inclusive, democratic nationalframework. We hope the Civil society will be adynamo of society and a demanding party forpolititians and rulers. We hope it will supporteverything good that comes out of those actorsand we hope it will share with them itsproposals for the present and above all wehope the civil society will implement that futurethrough small groups and projects; thedemocratic, creative and open future we wishfor us. We hope it will be really new; nototalitarianisms from the State or “party-cracies”of any color that Cuba has already known andsuffered. All in all, Civil society should be thenew name of democracy in Cuba.At the end of these considerations which comefrom our condition of simple Cuban citizens,we wish to stop in order to reafirm a convictionthat comes more and more urgent, necesaryand decisive:It’s the Cuban people, that is, each one ofCubans, women or men, however they think,wherever they are, the ones who have to be theprotagonists of the changes toward a pluralistdemocracy in Cuba. And when we sayprotagonism we are not speaking aboutmessianisms or leaderships or populisms. Wespeak about the real meaning of thatcontroversial and rich term which comes fromthe Latin language: “proto-agonae”, that is, “thefirst in the agony”, as was so well expressed bythe Apostle of our independence José Martí,with his word and with his life: the agony forthe nation.We are speaking about the daily participation,real and effective, simple but efficient, whichremains and never goes, which denounces forfifteen minutes of each hour but announces,proposes and works for those inclusive changesduring the other 45 minutes of each hour inCuba.The incipient diversity or duality which canbecome plurality is not in itself negative orworrying as long as the structural changes aremade at the same time creating or reformingthe indispensable institutions to channelinitiatives, debate things freely and reachagreements in favor of the common good of theNation.Liberalization always brings about diversity ofoptions and these bring about disorientation toEdiciones <strong>Convivencia</strong>Pinar del Río. 201224
- Page 2 and 3: Consejo de Redacción de Convivenci
- Page 4 and 5: Cuba does have thought, projects an
- Page 6 and 7: with their changes and hesitations,
- Page 8 and 9: well, eveyone knows that they are n
- Page 10 and 11: There has to be a differentiation b
- Page 12: lind. Infiltrations of bureaucracy
- Page 15 and 16: We are, and we should be “the pro
- Page 17 and 18: have been introduced during decades
- Page 19 and 20: sacrifice his life, his prestige, h
- Page 21 and 22: have different political options, i
- Page 23: there is political will and changes
- Page 27 and 28: TO FREE THE PRODUCTIVE FORCESAND TH
- Page 29 and 30: tentative behaviors by the governme
- Page 31 and 32: the three powers of the State: the
- Page 33 and 34: what in our opinion is better for C
- Page 35 and 36: THERE IS NO FATHERLAND WITHOUTTHE S
- Page 37 and 38: Fatherland going to belong to every
- Page 39 and 40: CULTURE AND POLITICS IN CUBAEditori
- Page 41 and 42: that bearing in mind the strategies
- Page 43 and 44: POWER IS FOR SERVINGEditorial 10. J
- Page 45 and 46: An authentic exercise of power as a
- Page 47 and 48: “mosquitoes” which are the smal
- Page 49 and 50: “For I will take you from among t
- Page 51 and 52: forward by seizing the institutions
- Page 53 and 54: democratic participation where they
- Page 55 and 56: north and south of the human person
- Page 57 and 58: wins with the complementation and t
- Page 59 and 60: has reached a citizenship category
- Page 61 and 62: THE ABSOLUTE RESPECTFOR ALL OF THE
- Page 63 and 64: It is clear that it is about the in
- Page 65 and 66: negotiation techniques because it c
- Page 67 and 68: who are firmly coherent, which does
- Page 69 and 70: The government faced one first dile
- Page 71 and 72: credibility, the service and thesov
- Page 73 and 74: make them coherent with those inter
- Page 75 and 76:
democracy even when all of thesecon
- Page 77 and 78:
ECONOMY WITH FREEDOM AND RESPONSIBI
- Page 79 and 80:
ethical dimension of the debate abo
- Page 81 and 82:
expecting from us Cubans, men andwo
- Page 83 and 84:
fraternal, humanitarian institution
- Page 85 and 86:
or social institution should keep i
- Page 87 and 88:
State and the worst way to violate
- Page 89 and 90:
diversity would not be considered a
- Page 91 and 92:
democratic government whose capacit
- Page 93 and 94:
is no possible development. Back in
- Page 95 and 96:
dimension in order to safeguard the
- Page 97 and 98:
.Requirements to publish announceme
- Page 99 and 100:
That is why it is logical and good
- Page 101 and 102:
or repressed for his faith and for
- Page 103 and 104:
CIVIC FRIENDSHIP AND PACIFIC COEXIS
- Page 105 and 106:
we have arrived to the conclusion t
- Page 107 and 108:
Assembly in 1940:“! Parties, stay
- Page 109 and 110:
WHAT COMES AFTER THE POPE’S VISIT
- Page 111 and 112:
the search for it always implies an
- Page 113 and 114:
In number 6 of our cited Editorial
- Page 115 and 116:
CUBA DOES HAVE THOUGHT, PROJECTSAND
- Page 117 and 118:
everlasting projects shall be never
- Page 119 and 120:
prisoners of conscience. This group
- Page 121 and 122:
After 110 years of the birth of tha
- Page 123 and 124:
one ideology. To use persons to see
- Page 125 and 126:
perspective given by any statesman
- Page 127 and 128:
we respect everybody, we live weavi
- Page 129 and 130:
Relación de artistas cubanos y las