and mathematical amount of deaths. Onlyone life is worth the same as the wholehuman life is worth. To play down theimportance of the death of only one personor disregarding it can open the door to thejustification of what is worse: to kill or let diethousands or millions of persons for anyreason of State or politics or religion, oreconomics. All genocides start with oneperson and if there is not a strong rejection,the moral relativism of the quantity willjustify the exponential growth of death. It’sworse to condemn the magnification of thedeath of one person than letting him die.To neglect the death of one person ordisqualifying his acts in order to minimizethe importance of his death is more seriouswhen the event is in front of our faces andour consciences and we have time andinformation that allow us to discern. Everyneglecting of the death of one person isethically unacceptable and there isjustification to condemn it. Wheneversomeone becomes an accomplice to death ofa defender of life, above every political orsocial argument he is clearly defining hisown moral height.If it is the case of one person who values andsupports violence and death, it’s veryregrettable and worrying, but if it is the caseof one religious group, an organized mafiaor even a modern State, it is even moreserious and then the duty of denouncing, offinding solutions and creating states ofopinion which lead to disallowing suchexcesses should be a responsibility of all ofus, shared by every honest citizen, by everysocial group, by every institution whichrespects itself. This responsibility alsoincludes the entire international communitywhich should make a commitment.So states the Pope Benedict XVI before theGeneral Assembly of the United Nations:“The acknowledgement of the unity of thehuman family and the attention to the innatedignity of every man and woman acquirestoday a new emphasis due to the principle ofthe responsibility to protect. This principlehas been defined recently but it was alreadypresent in an implicit way, when the UnitedNations were founded and now it has turnedmore and more into a characteristic of theactivities of the Organization. Every State hasthe primary duty of protecting its populationfrom the serious and continuous violations ofthe human rights, as well as from theconsequences of the humanitarian crisisprovoked either by nature or by men”. (BenedictXVI in the General Assembly of the UnitedNations, New York, Friday 18 th April 2008. Thistext was entirely published in “<strong>Convivencia</strong>”magazine Nº 3, May-June 2008,www.convivenciacuba.es).We should say clearly and precisely that everynation should respect the sovereignty, theindependence and the self determination of thepeoples. This is a fundamental principle of theinternational relations and the dignity andrespect that all peoples deserve as well as everygroup or group of nations. The empires,colonialism and neo colonialism are equallyreprehensible by the universal conscience.Nobody wants any nation to intervene in theinternal affairs of another nation. But no matterhow important this principle is, it’s not moreimportant than the human life. If we accept thatthe primary, supreme and main value is thelives of persons, then we can understand thefact that a religious leader, that is, the Pope, orthe most representative internationalorganization have clarified that the ones whodo not respect the human life, even if it is oneonly person, are the first ones who lead to andprovoke the reaction of the internationalcommunity:“If the State is not capable of guaranteeing thisprotection, the international community has tointervene by means of the legal resortsestablished by the United Nations Chart and byother international instruments. The action ofthe international community and its institutions,taking for granted the respect for the principlesthat lie in the base of the international order,never has to be interpreted as an unjustifiedimposition and a limitation to the sovereignty.On the contrary, the indifference or the lack ofintervention is what causes a real harm. What isneeded is a deeper search for the means toprevent and control the conflicts, by exploringany possible diplomatic via and by payingattention and also stimulating the slightestsigns of dialogue or desire for reconciliation”.(Benedict XVI in the General Assembly of theUnited Nations, New York, Friday 18 th April2008).Ediciones <strong>Convivencia</strong>Pinar del Río. 201261
It is clear that it is about the intervention ofthe international organizations and underthe United Nations Chart and through theinternational legal instruments. The realdamage, says the Pope, is the indifferenceand the lack of international interventionwhen the principle of protecting the citizenswithout distinction is violated. A governmentthat respects the sacred duty of taking careof the human life of all has nothing to fear.The life of honest citizens and the life ofcriminals, of political and ordinary prisoners;life from its conception to its natural end,the life of one only person and the life ofmillions of persons, the life of the peoples ofthe North or the South, the life in Abu Graibor in Guantánamo and the life in the Cubanprisons or hospitals. Nothing justifies thatone only life may be lost. It is regrettablethat there may be a neglecting of theseriousness of life loss by considering thenumber of persons that lost their lives or byconsidering the immense number of personsthat are taken care of inside the country orabroad while they exercise solidarity. Onlyone Haitian has the same value compared tothe ones who died squashed by the collapse.Our humanism would reject the fact of notpaying attention to one person becausemillions died. Why does this principle workthere and we neglect it here?The life of a psychological sane person hasthe same value than the life of one patient ina psychiatric hospital. Why do they create acommission to investigate the death in oneof our hospitals and they do not createanother commission to investigate who letdie only one person in another hospital? It isa duty of the rulers and a right of the onesunder a government. And this is not aninvention by present media campaigns or bya right-wing ideological trend. It is apatrimony of our legal and ethical culturethroughout centuries, codified in the wellknown People Right which was founded andelaborated in the Salamanca University in the16 th century with the contribution of theDominican Fathers, especially with our closeFather Fray Bartolomé de Las Casas. Sostates the Pope in his well known speech inthe United Nations:gentium as the foundations of all the acts bythe rulers towards the persons under theirgovernment: in times when the concept ofnational sovereign States was being developed,the Dominican friar Francisco de Victoria, whowas rightly considered to be the precursor ofthe idea of founding the United Nations,described such responsibility as an aspect ofthe natural reason shared by all Nations and asthe result of one international order whose taskwas to regulate the relations among peoples.Today, like then, this principle has to makereference to the idea of the person as image ofthe Creator, to the desire of an absolute andessential freedom” ( Benedict XVI in the GeneralAssembly of the United Nations, New York,Friday 18 th April 2008).The essence is the freedom of each humanperson which is not granted by any State or byany law but by his Creator. It is freedom whichmakes us free, as Jesus said. The freedomabout the women and men, the truth about themission of the State; the truth about the humanrights and duties; the truth about the sacredand inviolable condition of every human lifeand every dimension and stage of life.“The only way to be free”, as Martí said, is thecultivation of the truth culture about the humandignity. Martí’s postulate, which is fortunatelyin force in the present Constitution of Cuba,summarizes our political culture, ourhumanism: it ratifies the value of life and thehuman rights; invites us to put this ethicalcriterion as the supreme law of our Republicand even more: it urges us to turn the absoluterespect of the human life into a cult that we allcan offer at the altar of the Fatherland.“I wish the first law of our Republic be the cultof Cubans to the full dignity of men”.Pinar del Río, April 10 th 2010.“The principle of the “responsibility toprotect” was considered by the ancient iusEdiciones <strong>Convivencia</strong>Pinar del Río. 201262
- Page 2 and 3:
Consejo de Redacción de Convivenci
- Page 4 and 5:
Cuba does have thought, projects an
- Page 6 and 7:
with their changes and hesitations,
- Page 8 and 9:
well, eveyone knows that they are n
- Page 10 and 11:
There has to be a differentiation b
- Page 12: lind. Infiltrations of bureaucracy
- Page 15 and 16: We are, and we should be “the pro
- Page 17 and 18: have been introduced during decades
- Page 19 and 20: sacrifice his life, his prestige, h
- Page 21 and 22: have different political options, i
- Page 23 and 24: there is political will and changes
- Page 25 and 26: Conclusions from its Council. We th
- Page 27 and 28: TO FREE THE PRODUCTIVE FORCESAND TH
- Page 29 and 30: tentative behaviors by the governme
- Page 31 and 32: the three powers of the State: the
- Page 33 and 34: what in our opinion is better for C
- Page 35 and 36: THERE IS NO FATHERLAND WITHOUTTHE S
- Page 37 and 38: Fatherland going to belong to every
- Page 39 and 40: CULTURE AND POLITICS IN CUBAEditori
- Page 41 and 42: that bearing in mind the strategies
- Page 43 and 44: POWER IS FOR SERVINGEditorial 10. J
- Page 45 and 46: An authentic exercise of power as a
- Page 47 and 48: “mosquitoes” which are the smal
- Page 49 and 50: “For I will take you from among t
- Page 51 and 52: forward by seizing the institutions
- Page 53 and 54: democratic participation where they
- Page 55 and 56: north and south of the human person
- Page 57 and 58: wins with the complementation and t
- Page 59 and 60: has reached a citizenship category
- Page 61: THE ABSOLUTE RESPECTFOR ALL OF THE
- Page 65 and 66: negotiation techniques because it c
- Page 67 and 68: who are firmly coherent, which does
- Page 69 and 70: The government faced one first dile
- Page 71 and 72: credibility, the service and thesov
- Page 73 and 74: make them coherent with those inter
- Page 75 and 76: democracy even when all of thesecon
- Page 77 and 78: ECONOMY WITH FREEDOM AND RESPONSIBI
- Page 79 and 80: ethical dimension of the debate abo
- Page 81 and 82: expecting from us Cubans, men andwo
- Page 83 and 84: fraternal, humanitarian institution
- Page 85 and 86: or social institution should keep i
- Page 87 and 88: State and the worst way to violate
- Page 89 and 90: diversity would not be considered a
- Page 91 and 92: democratic government whose capacit
- Page 93 and 94: is no possible development. Back in
- Page 95 and 96: dimension in order to safeguard the
- Page 97 and 98: .Requirements to publish announceme
- Page 99 and 100: That is why it is logical and good
- Page 101 and 102: or repressed for his faith and for
- Page 103 and 104: CIVIC FRIENDSHIP AND PACIFIC COEXIS
- Page 105 and 106: we have arrived to the conclusion t
- Page 107 and 108: Assembly in 1940:“! Parties, stay
- Page 109 and 110: WHAT COMES AFTER THE POPE’S VISIT
- Page 111 and 112: the search for it always implies an
- Page 113 and 114:
In number 6 of our cited Editorial
- Page 115 and 116:
CUBA DOES HAVE THOUGHT, PROJECTSAND
- Page 117 and 118:
everlasting projects shall be never
- Page 119 and 120:
prisoners of conscience. This group
- Page 121 and 122:
After 110 years of the birth of tha
- Page 123 and 124:
one ideology. To use persons to see
- Page 125 and 126:
perspective given by any statesman
- Page 127 and 128:
we respect everybody, we live weavi
- Page 129 and 130:
Relación de artistas cubanos y las