well, eveyone knows that they are necessaryand urgent but... who bells the cat?There are, at least, two possible attitudes oranswers to the former popular expression:The atttitude which expects others to takethe risk, which expects others to be able totake action. Such attitude paralizes us. Thatis the trick of the proverb. And a second wayof giving a possitive answer to the question“who?” is the way offered by Father FelixVarela, “the first man who tought us how tothink” with our own brains:“It is necessary that the valuable men... thereal patriots persuade themselves that now,more than ever they are obligated to beuseful to the Fatherland, with the lack ofinterest of the honest man, but with all thestrength and the energy of a patriot... toprevent on time the wicked and mediocrepersons take the place of the best Childrenof the country because of their indiference”...“What easy resourses fear has! If the houseof a friend is burning, would it be an act ofprudence and friendship not to awake himwhile he is sleeping? And the ones who arealways saying: who bells the cat”? Is itnecessary to stick it out? It is enough toelaborate an opinion... and everybodyrealizes that there is an agreement amongall and then...Once bitten twice shy!” (ElHabanero).To elaborate a “state of opinion” is a way ofbeing a part of the changes and this issomething that everybody can do. It’s aneffective method. If we express and shareour opinions, in a free, respectful and sereneway, we can bell the cat all of us, that is, wecan be part of the transformations that havestarted, as ordinary citizens. This is thesovereignty from below. This is the firstanswer to “who” the protagonists of thechange are going to be: the citizens, all ofthem. Indiference is the worst enemy in thishour.We should say even more: We, the people, allof us are the most numerous and effectivepacific opposition, even if we are not awareof this role or its importance andeffectiveness. But we are. And thegovernment knows it very well. As a matterof fact, what is happening in Cuba andwhat’s going to happen, as in any other placein the world, has happened and is going tohappen as an answer to the pressure of thedaily needs of the people which cannot bepostponed. That is the most effective andpersevering pacific opposition. It’s thegreatest force for change and can’t berepressed increasingly and forever withoutcalling the attention, in a strong way, of theworld which today, more than ever has gotit’s eyes on us. It is a pressing andunavoidable reality. The very Cubangovernment knows it. If not, what are the“opinion of the people” surveys for? What arethe “round tables” and the “battle of ideas”for? Why the urgent wish that the image ofCuba be of total normality, order and unityuniformity?Disorder, which nobody wants, isnot necessarily the only way the tormentedpeople has to express itself.It can be said that it is for education; it can besaid that it is for avoiding confusion, forpreparing us psicologically and politically.Good. It could be. But that is not enoughbecause all of it vanishes the next morningwhen we face the agony of the daily struggle.That is the best barometer of the socialpressure: The voice of the people buried oron the streets, and this is happening everyday louder and more often. Something thatcannot be indefinitely endured: the needs, thehardship. Something that is growing and willconstantly grow until real changes areperformed. Deep, structural, not cosmeticchanges. The needs do not depend on anideology or a party. The needs have taken usto this crucial moment and they will continuepushing.Let’s look around: university students whodiscuss things with a leader applaud a youngman from Las Tunas, keep vigils asking forautonomy and do demands to the Deans andleaders; workers who do not earn the propersalaries in the very State corporations; artistswho escape or stay escaped, farmers who donot produce food because they don’t receivethe proper pay; houswives whose “battle ofideas” is fought in their kitchens every day inorder to figure out how to make ends meet;the defenseless old men and the helpless illpersons that are a crowd in the ricketycorridors of hospitals that are being eternallyrepaired...the force and the pressure ofEdiciones <strong>Convivencia</strong>Pinar del Río. 20127
survival: major and gratest opponents to anypublic administration. And that is not afaction. Not mercenaries. Not traitors. It’sthe Fatherland.But though the opinion and the pressure ofcitizens are the major performers, this is notenough. Part of this Fatherland whichbelongs to all, part of this nation which is allof us, are the rest of the “legs” of thenational “table”: the government, thepolitical opposition and the rest of the civilsociety organized in informal groups; socialor cultural associations; religious institutionsand others. These three protagonistscomplete the cast of this performance whichis: change. These actors are a part of theFatherland too.Then we would have to stop and make surethat some of the premises for change areclear, accepted and consistently assumed.We suggest six of them:No pacific change is done without the formergovernment. We have to rely on it and itmust give up what corresponds in order toreceive respect and prevent socialexacerbations. Time is not unlimited and itis a factor for credibility.No government gives up, not even whatcorresponds, without the pressure of theopposition and the civil society and theopposition of the citizenship in the directionestablished by necessity. Facing the newsigns of time, what new answers andinitiatives are offered by the opposition andthe civil society?No opposition force can exercise an effectivepressure if the primary needs of the peopleare not taken into account before its partyprograms. To listen to the vox populi, tohelp its awareness and to act as its catalyst.And also, adjust the programs to suchsoveriegn vox populi.Every government gives up insofar as thecivic pressure grows. They are directlyproporcional. Nobody should expect a newstep if he does not make an effort todemand it, but in a pacific way. Becauseviolence paralizes us and aborts any reform.We don’t understand pressure as blackmailbut as demanding and responsibleparticipation of citizens and a sign of civicmaturity and political normality. A countrywithout pressure is a country without bloodpressure. Not to give up to legitimatepressure exerted by the ones who aresupposed to give pulse to the social body canbe a sign of “rigor mortis”, a sign of fatalrigidity. To give up to sane pressure based onthe natural Right is a sign of the vitality of asystem, not a sign of weakness.Every change and transition is a process ofstages. If we want it to be pacific, it has to begradual. And if it is gradual we must believein the small steps and not discredit thembefore their effectiveness and veracity arevalidated. We all are to validate them byacting consistently, as if they were true, untilthe contrary is shown. This is the only way forus to obtain moral authority. To buck, tomake steps forward and steps backwards andsome of them to the sides, is inherent toevery pacific transition. No transformationhas been done straightly. That is a mythwhich we must unfold in order to heal ourdiscouragement.The role of the international community: Nopeople can live isolated from the presentworld, global and supportive, interdependentand neighbouring. Sovereignty should not beabandoned because it is essential to citizensand peoples, but this sovereignty is notstrengthened by stubbornness and anoutdated oppresive nationalism. All exiles inHistory have shown that living together withother nationalities and cultures does notweaken but strengthens identity andsovereignty. Every open and respectfulrequests from the international communityare good. To collate with lucidity andresponsiblity, our ways of political, economicand social coexistence according to thestandards of the present world is the bestway of being really sovereign andstrengthening the identity as a people. Hewho gets stubborn and thinks that the rest ofthe world is wrong cannot acknowledge hisidentity because he does not have means tocompare, or mirrors to recognize himself orencouragement to grow as a people. Beingstubborn is like being blind: nothing new orbetter is given to light.Ediciones <strong>Convivencia</strong>Pinar del Río. 20128
- Page 2 and 3: Consejo de Redacción de Convivenci
- Page 4 and 5: Cuba does have thought, projects an
- Page 6 and 7: with their changes and hesitations,
- Page 10 and 11: There has to be a differentiation b
- Page 12: lind. Infiltrations of bureaucracy
- Page 15 and 16: We are, and we should be “the pro
- Page 17 and 18: have been introduced during decades
- Page 19 and 20: sacrifice his life, his prestige, h
- Page 21 and 22: have different political options, i
- Page 23 and 24: there is political will and changes
- Page 25 and 26: Conclusions from its Council. We th
- Page 27 and 28: TO FREE THE PRODUCTIVE FORCESAND TH
- Page 29 and 30: tentative behaviors by the governme
- Page 31 and 32: the three powers of the State: the
- Page 33 and 34: what in our opinion is better for C
- Page 35 and 36: THERE IS NO FATHERLAND WITHOUTTHE S
- Page 37 and 38: Fatherland going to belong to every
- Page 39 and 40: CULTURE AND POLITICS IN CUBAEditori
- Page 41 and 42: that bearing in mind the strategies
- Page 43 and 44: POWER IS FOR SERVINGEditorial 10. J
- Page 45 and 46: An authentic exercise of power as a
- Page 47 and 48: “mosquitoes” which are the smal
- Page 49 and 50: “For I will take you from among t
- Page 51 and 52: forward by seizing the institutions
- Page 53 and 54: democratic participation where they
- Page 55 and 56: north and south of the human person
- Page 57 and 58: wins with the complementation and t
- Page 59 and 60:
has reached a citizenship category
- Page 61 and 62:
THE ABSOLUTE RESPECTFOR ALL OF THE
- Page 63 and 64:
It is clear that it is about the in
- Page 65 and 66:
negotiation techniques because it c
- Page 67 and 68:
who are firmly coherent, which does
- Page 69 and 70:
The government faced one first dile
- Page 71 and 72:
credibility, the service and thesov
- Page 73 and 74:
make them coherent with those inter
- Page 75 and 76:
democracy even when all of thesecon
- Page 77 and 78:
ECONOMY WITH FREEDOM AND RESPONSIBI
- Page 79 and 80:
ethical dimension of the debate abo
- Page 81 and 82:
expecting from us Cubans, men andwo
- Page 83 and 84:
fraternal, humanitarian institution
- Page 85 and 86:
or social institution should keep i
- Page 87 and 88:
State and the worst way to violate
- Page 89 and 90:
diversity would not be considered a
- Page 91 and 92:
democratic government whose capacit
- Page 93 and 94:
is no possible development. Back in
- Page 95 and 96:
dimension in order to safeguard the
- Page 97 and 98:
.Requirements to publish announceme
- Page 99 and 100:
That is why it is logical and good
- Page 101 and 102:
or repressed for his faith and for
- Page 103 and 104:
CIVIC FRIENDSHIP AND PACIFIC COEXIS
- Page 105 and 106:
we have arrived to the conclusion t
- Page 107 and 108:
Assembly in 1940:“! Parties, stay
- Page 109 and 110:
WHAT COMES AFTER THE POPE’S VISIT
- Page 111 and 112:
the search for it always implies an
- Page 113 and 114:
In number 6 of our cited Editorial
- Page 115 and 116:
CUBA DOES HAVE THOUGHT, PROJECTSAND
- Page 117 and 118:
everlasting projects shall be never
- Page 119 and 120:
prisoners of conscience. This group
- Page 121 and 122:
After 110 years of the birth of tha
- Page 123 and 124:
one ideology. To use persons to see
- Page 125 and 126:
perspective given by any statesman
- Page 127 and 128:
we respect everybody, we live weavi
- Page 129 and 130:
Relación de artistas cubanos y las