the ones who have had a closed and onlyhole to see reality and to live in it. When thewindow is opened each one can watchdifferent sceneries and landscapes. That isnormal. Even the eternal dialectics betweenreform and counter reform can rise to thesurface. All this is even logical after comingout from decades of an “anchor-and-belt”policy. But deep down this is anunmistakable sign that plural life alwaysemerges, even from the most monolithicstructural formats. It’s life which has got thelast word. It’s the present which does notallow itself to be locked even in the mostperfect and good of pasts. It’s the futurewhich does not stop constructing itself,unstoppable and sometimes imperceptiblefrom the vigorous and undecided “today”.There’s no point in carrying out diplomaticnegotiations, not even in the change of theforeign policy of the United States towardCuba, if the Cuban people does not get outof that disorientation and does not overcomethe dialectics of plurality to occupy its placein the Civil society, overcome the civicilliteracy and exercise sovereignty frombelow, which will make us all protagonists,co-responsible for our own Nation.Only then each Cuban, woman or man, willhave enough right and morality to demandto the international community a respectfulsupport and its solidarity, directlyproportional to the civic protagonism of thepersons, which means, directly proportionalto their daily work, sometimes silent but notless valid. Thus it will become a reality thefact that these conclusions take for grantedor essential: it’s the Cuban people the onlysovereign of its destiny.Pinar del Río, July 12 th 2008.Ediciones <strong>Convivencia</strong>Pinar del Río. 201225
TO FREE THE PRODUCTIVE FORCESAND THE INITIATIVE OF CUBANSEditorial 6. Nov-Dec-2008. <strong>Convivencia</strong> Magazine. www.convivenciacuba.esCuba finds itself in a situation qualitativedifferent from the one we lived before thepassage of the two latter hurricanes. In fact,all Cubans know, though we never say, thatthey have been, at least, three hurricanes,not counting the former hurricanes.Indeed, we believe that these two meteors:Gustav and Ike, have come to fill thatquantitative and systematic accumulation offive consecutive decades which hasdevastated -it literally means to leaveisolated and with nothing- the Island of theCaribbean which once used to be thedestination of so many inmigrants and theparadise of so many appetites. Alwaysoverflowed with requests, some honest andprogressive... other times ethicallyunacceptable. Now it’s not like this. For thebetter and for the worse.It would be wrong, or at least, highlydeviating, to observe and evaluate ordiagnose the present situation in Cubastarting from an analysis of the economic,political and social reality bearing in mindonly the consequences of the two terriblenatural disasters.Not even considering that Cuba has been thevictim of a natural disaster in its widestmeaning, we could evaluate the situation ofthe nation as objectively as possible.It’s necessary to observe the statistics of thehouses and buildings that have been totallycollapsed, as well as the damages to theagriculture and the industry of the mainproductive branches such as tourism and thenickel. But also we would have to ask ourselves:Why were the houses so deteriorated? Why havenot been solved in the long run -so long as halfa century- the construction of anticyclonehouses in a country located in the Caribbeansuch as ours and with all of the resourcescentralized in the hands of a State that only hasto decide with no objections, where to usethem? Why was inefficiency battering, the sameas a five-category-hurricane, the inmensemajority of the enterprises, industries andsistematic forces of the country withoutstopping it for five decades? Who decided thepriorities that superseded these vital necessityof houses and infrastructure considered asurgent since 1952, in the far-off days of theMoncada Program?It’s necessary to bear in mind the totaldestruction of the electric system all along thenarrow Island and the inability of the existingsources of energy to cope with the demand ofthis small country. But we would also have toask ourselves: why in 50 years was not thedistribution network buried according to theeconomy and the help worth millions comingfirst from the USSR and then from Venezuela?Why were not substituted, little by little, theobsolete sources of energy until now? Whodecided the priorities of each quinquenniumwhich left behind this vital generation anddistribution of electric energy?It is necessary to listen to and bear in mind thetotal defenselessness of the m ajority of thecitizens, the Cubans, men and women, who say,Ediciones <strong>Convivencia</strong>Pinar del Río. 201226
- Page 2 and 3: Consejo de Redacción de Convivenci
- Page 4 and 5: Cuba does have thought, projects an
- Page 6 and 7: with their changes and hesitations,
- Page 8 and 9: well, eveyone knows that they are n
- Page 10 and 11: There has to be a differentiation b
- Page 12: lind. Infiltrations of bureaucracy
- Page 15 and 16: We are, and we should be “the pro
- Page 17 and 18: have been introduced during decades
- Page 19 and 20: sacrifice his life, his prestige, h
- Page 21 and 22: have different political options, i
- Page 23 and 24: there is political will and changes
- Page 25: Conclusions from its Council. We th
- Page 29 and 30: tentative behaviors by the governme
- Page 31 and 32: the three powers of the State: the
- Page 33 and 34: what in our opinion is better for C
- Page 35 and 36: THERE IS NO FATHERLAND WITHOUTTHE S
- Page 37 and 38: Fatherland going to belong to every
- Page 39 and 40: CULTURE AND POLITICS IN CUBAEditori
- Page 41 and 42: that bearing in mind the strategies
- Page 43 and 44: POWER IS FOR SERVINGEditorial 10. J
- Page 45 and 46: An authentic exercise of power as a
- Page 47 and 48: “mosquitoes” which are the smal
- Page 49 and 50: “For I will take you from among t
- Page 51 and 52: forward by seizing the institutions
- Page 53 and 54: democratic participation where they
- Page 55 and 56: north and south of the human person
- Page 57 and 58: wins with the complementation and t
- Page 59 and 60: has reached a citizenship category
- Page 61 and 62: THE ABSOLUTE RESPECTFOR ALL OF THE
- Page 63 and 64: It is clear that it is about the in
- Page 65 and 66: negotiation techniques because it c
- Page 67 and 68: who are firmly coherent, which does
- Page 69 and 70: The government faced one first dile
- Page 71 and 72: credibility, the service and thesov
- Page 73 and 74: make them coherent with those inter
- Page 75 and 76: democracy even when all of thesecon
- Page 77 and 78:
ECONOMY WITH FREEDOM AND RESPONSIBI
- Page 79 and 80:
ethical dimension of the debate abo
- Page 81 and 82:
expecting from us Cubans, men andwo
- Page 83 and 84:
fraternal, humanitarian institution
- Page 85 and 86:
or social institution should keep i
- Page 87 and 88:
State and the worst way to violate
- Page 89 and 90:
diversity would not be considered a
- Page 91 and 92:
democratic government whose capacit
- Page 93 and 94:
is no possible development. Back in
- Page 95 and 96:
dimension in order to safeguard the
- Page 97 and 98:
.Requirements to publish announceme
- Page 99 and 100:
That is why it is logical and good
- Page 101 and 102:
or repressed for his faith and for
- Page 103 and 104:
CIVIC FRIENDSHIP AND PACIFIC COEXIS
- Page 105 and 106:
we have arrived to the conclusion t
- Page 107 and 108:
Assembly in 1940:“! Parties, stay
- Page 109 and 110:
WHAT COMES AFTER THE POPE’S VISIT
- Page 111 and 112:
the search for it always implies an
- Page 113 and 114:
In number 6 of our cited Editorial
- Page 115 and 116:
CUBA DOES HAVE THOUGHT, PROJECTSAND
- Page 117 and 118:
everlasting projects shall be never
- Page 119 and 120:
prisoners of conscience. This group
- Page 121 and 122:
After 110 years of the birth of tha
- Page 123 and 124:
one ideology. To use persons to see
- Page 125 and 126:
perspective given by any statesman
- Page 127 and 128:
we respect everybody, we live weavi
- Page 129 and 130:
Relación de artistas cubanos y las