13.07.2015 Views

Strategic Flood Risk Assessment - South Worcestershire ...

Strategic Flood Risk Assessment - South Worcestershire ...

Strategic Flood Risk Assessment - South Worcestershire ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Surface Water Drainage:As an indication of requirements to manage surface water runoff at the development site anassessment of the soil types, greenfield runoff rate and attenuation storage volume is includedbelow. Storage volumes displayed are calculated with an assumption that 75% of the site will bedeveloped impermeable ground. A 25% increase in rainfall depths has been included torepresent predicted future climate change effects.PLEASE NOTE: This assessment has been carried out using broad-scale datasets and aims toprovide an indication of the likely opportunities and constraints for this development site. Adetailed drainage assessment based on site-specific conditions should be carried out by asuitably qualified professional and submitted with any planning application. The values belowshould not be used for design purposes.Soil TypeGreenfield Runoff Rate (l/s/ha)Estimated Attenuation Storage Volume (m 3 ) 40 – 60SUDS and the development site:SUDS TypeSource ControlInfiltrationDetentionFiltrationConveyance<strong>Flood</strong> Defences:None.PotentialSuitabilityCommentsAlluvial Deposits1 in 2 year 9.61 in 100 year (plus climate change) 37.1Most source control techniques are likely to be suitable. Permeablepaving is unlikely to be suitable due to high risk of groundwaterfloodingMapping suggests underlying soil is likely to be permeable. Howeverthe high risk of groundwater flooding would make infiltrationunsuitableDetention techniques may be suitable if a non-permeable liner isprovided to prevent the ingress of groundwater. Mapping suggeststhat site slopes may be steep so larger features may not be viableFiltration techniques may be suitable if a non-permeable liner isprovided to prevent the ingress of groundwaterAll conveyance techniques are likely to be suitableThe site is not located within a groundwater source protection zone.Residential developments should provide at least two independent SUDS features inseries to provide a suitable level of water quality treatment.Effects of Climate Change:Increased rainfall intensity. Increased water levels in an unnamed tributary of Pool Brook.<strong>Flood</strong> <strong>Risk</strong> Implications for Development:All development should be located within <strong>Flood</strong> Zone 1, unless appropriate inaccordance with NPPF Technical Guidance.A detailed site-specific flood risk assessment, including hazard mapping, will berequired for any development in <strong>Flood</strong> Zone 2, or for sites greater than 1ha in <strong>Flood</strong>Zone 1.Development of the site is proposed to focus on residential uses.Resilience measures will be required if buildings are situated in the flood risk area.Green infrastructure should be considered within the mitigation measures for surfacewater runoff from potential development.<strong>Assessment</strong> for runoff should include allowance for climate change effects.New or re-development should adopt exemplar source control SUDS techniques toreduce the risk of frequent low impact flooding due to post-development runoff.Onsite attenuation schemes would need to be tested against the hydrograph of thereceiving watercourse to ensure flows are not exacerbated downstream within thecatchment.2012s5947 S <strong>Worcestershire</strong> Level 2 SFRA Update FINAL Report v1.0.doc 120

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!