13.07.2015 Views

Strategic Flood Risk Assessment - South Worcestershire ...

Strategic Flood Risk Assessment - South Worcestershire ...

Strategic Flood Risk Assessment - South Worcestershire ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Zone 1Zone 2Zone 3aZone 3bTable 4-1: <strong>Flood</strong> Zone descriptionsProbability Description Suitable Development*LowMediumHighFunction<strong>Flood</strong>plainThis zone comprises land assessedas having a less than 1 in 1000annual probability of river or seaflooding in any year (1.0%) or a greater than 1 in 200annual probability of flooding fromthe sea (>0.5%) in any year.This zone comprises land wherewater has to flow or be stored intimes of flood. SFRAs shouldidentify this <strong>Flood</strong> Zone (land whichwould flood with an annualprobability of 1 in 20 (5%) or greaterin any year or is designed to flood inan extreme (0.1%) flood, or atanother probability to be agreedbetween the LPA and theEnvironment Agency, includingwater conveyance routes.All uses of landWater compatible, lessvulnerable and more vulnerableuses of land and essentialinfrastructure are appropriate.The highly vulnerable uses areonly appropriate if the ExceptionTest is passed.Water compatible and lessvulnerable uses of land areappropriate.More vulnerable and essentialinfrastructure should only bepermitted if the Exception test ispassed.Highly vulnerable uses shouldnot be permitted.Water compatible and essentialinfrastructure that has to bethere is permitted.Essential infrastructure shouldpass the Exception Test and bedesigned and constructed tomeet a number of flood riskrelated targets.Less vulnerable, morevulnerable and highlyvulnerable uses should not bepermitted.The preference when allocating land is, whenever possible, to place all new development onland in Zone 1. Since the zones identify land that is not reliant on flood defences, placingdevelopment on Zone 1 land means that in future there is no commitment to spending money onflood banks or flood alleviation measures and not committing future generations to costly longterm expenditure that would become increasingly unsustainable as the effects of climate changeincrease. However, the runoff from development on Zone 1 land can potentially cause anincrease in the probability of flooding to existing downstream development. Information in theSFRA should be used to address this issue.4.2.2 Sub-divisions of <strong>Flood</strong> Zone 3 in <strong>South</strong> <strong>Worcestershire</strong>NPPF Technical Guidance, Table 1 defines <strong>Flood</strong> <strong>Risk</strong> Zones 3a (high probability) and 3b(functional floodplain). The latter can be defined as the 1 in 20-year return period flood, or atanother probability to be agreed between the LPA and the Environment Agency, including waterconveyance routes.For the <strong>South</strong> <strong>Worcestershire</strong> area, the LPAs and the Environment Agency have agreedon three sub-divisions of <strong>Flood</strong> Zone 3 for the major urban areas (Worcester, DroitwichSpa, Evesham, Pershore, Tenbury Wells and Upton upon Severn) as defined below:2012s5947 S <strong>Worcestershire</strong> Level 2 SFRA Update FINAL Report v1.0.doc 24

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!