26.08.2015 Views

Chapter 3 – Policy Implications for Gaelic - University of Edinburgh

Chapter 3 – Policy Implications for Gaelic - University of Edinburgh

Chapter 3 – Policy Implications for Gaelic - University of Edinburgh

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

The <strong>University</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Edinburgh</strong><br />

The <strong>University</strong> Court<br />

D5<br />

2 July 2012<br />

Collections Review Report<br />

Brief description <strong>of</strong> the paper, including statement <strong>of</strong> relevance to the <strong>University</strong>’s strategic plans and<br />

priorities where relevant<br />

This paper is the report <strong>of</strong> the Collections Review, chaired by Senior-Vice Principal Nigel Brown, and<br />

with members from Court, Colleges and EUSA. The report appendices are available at:<br />

http://tinyurl.com/calhhb6<br />

The review examined the inter-related issues <strong>of</strong> how the <strong>University</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Edinburgh</strong> funds the library<br />

materials budget, how it acquires library collections, how they are used, and whether the collection<br />

leads to satisfaction and value <strong>for</strong> money. The main finding <strong>of</strong> the review is that the present<br />

expenditure is neither sufficient to meet the ambition and aspirations <strong>of</strong> the <strong>University</strong>, nor does it<br />

match spend by comparators with an estimated shortfall <strong>of</strong> c.£1 million.<br />

Subsequent to the completion <strong>of</strong> the report, £500k has been made available through the planning<br />

round, and discussions are on-going with Colleges <strong>for</strong> the matching £500k.<br />

With this additional funding, In<strong>for</strong>mation Services will be able to pilot and monitor the effectiveness<br />

<strong>of</strong> new, more direct, acquisitions methods, as recommended by the Review. Updates on progress will<br />

be reported regularly via Library Committee and Knowledge Strategy Committee.<br />

Action requested<br />

For approval.<br />

Resource implications<br />

Does the paper have resource implications? Yes, £500k has been made available with a further £500k<br />

to be negotiated with the Colleges.<br />

Risk assessment<br />

Does the paper include a risk assessment? There is no <strong>for</strong>mal risk assessment, but there is a risk to<br />

the research and learning in not providing the library resources required.<br />

Equality and diversity<br />

Does the paper have equality and diversity implications? No<br />

Freedom <strong>of</strong> in<strong>for</strong>mation<br />

Can this paper be included in open business? Yes<br />

Originators <strong>of</strong> the paper<br />

Collections Review Group<br />

Nigel Brown, Convener<br />

Sheila Cannell, Secretary

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!