Chapter 3 â Policy Implications for Gaelic - University of Edinburgh
Chapter 3 â Policy Implications for Gaelic - University of Edinburgh
Chapter 3 â Policy Implications for Gaelic - University of Edinburgh
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
The <strong>University</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Edinburgh</strong><br />
The <strong>University</strong> Court<br />
D5<br />
2 July 2012<br />
Collections Review Report<br />
Brief description <strong>of</strong> the paper, including statement <strong>of</strong> relevance to the <strong>University</strong>’s strategic plans and<br />
priorities where relevant<br />
This paper is the report <strong>of</strong> the Collections Review, chaired by Senior-Vice Principal Nigel Brown, and<br />
with members from Court, Colleges and EUSA. The report appendices are available at:<br />
http://tinyurl.com/calhhb6<br />
The review examined the inter-related issues <strong>of</strong> how the <strong>University</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Edinburgh</strong> funds the library<br />
materials budget, how it acquires library collections, how they are used, and whether the collection<br />
leads to satisfaction and value <strong>for</strong> money. The main finding <strong>of</strong> the review is that the present<br />
expenditure is neither sufficient to meet the ambition and aspirations <strong>of</strong> the <strong>University</strong>, nor does it<br />
match spend by comparators with an estimated shortfall <strong>of</strong> c.£1 million.<br />
Subsequent to the completion <strong>of</strong> the report, £500k has been made available through the planning<br />
round, and discussions are on-going with Colleges <strong>for</strong> the matching £500k.<br />
With this additional funding, In<strong>for</strong>mation Services will be able to pilot and monitor the effectiveness<br />
<strong>of</strong> new, more direct, acquisitions methods, as recommended by the Review. Updates on progress will<br />
be reported regularly via Library Committee and Knowledge Strategy Committee.<br />
Action requested<br />
For approval.<br />
Resource implications<br />
Does the paper have resource implications? Yes, £500k has been made available with a further £500k<br />
to be negotiated with the Colleges.<br />
Risk assessment<br />
Does the paper include a risk assessment? There is no <strong>for</strong>mal risk assessment, but there is a risk to<br />
the research and learning in not providing the library resources required.<br />
Equality and diversity<br />
Does the paper have equality and diversity implications? No<br />
Freedom <strong>of</strong> in<strong>for</strong>mation<br />
Can this paper be included in open business? Yes<br />
Originators <strong>of</strong> the paper<br />
Collections Review Group<br />
Nigel Brown, Convener<br />
Sheila Cannell, Secretary