BATTLEFIELD OF THE FUTURE
Battlefield of the Future - Air University Press
Battlefield of the Future - Air University Press
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Overview : Future Airpower<br />
and Strategy Issues<br />
Strategy is the art and science of translating national security<br />
objectives into practical military plans and operations . Strategy<br />
formulation in an age of revolution in affairs is especially<br />
challenging . Our two strategy essays by two premier military<br />
thinkers, Col John Warden and Col Richard Szafranski, debate<br />
the issue of just how innovative strategy formulation must be in<br />
the midst of a military revolution . Col Warden argues that "war<br />
in the twenty-first century will be significantly different for the<br />
United States from anything encountered before the Gulf War."<br />
However, Col Szafranski contends that "there may not be really<br />
much that is revolutionary in contemporary notions of parallel<br />
war and hyperwar ."<br />
Col Warden believes that twenty-first century strategy will<br />
have to ensure great precision : high casualties will not be<br />
politically tolerable ; collateral damage must be minimized ;<br />
nonlethal weapons will have wide application ; and manipulation<br />
of information will be critical . Strategy will have to concentrate<br />
on an enemy's entire system of organization and activity, not<br />
simply its armed forces .<br />
Using the five-ring analogy, Col Warden proposes that strategy<br />
should target an adversary's leadership, energy or resources,<br />
infrastructure, population, and armed forces . This would make<br />
airpower the dominant instrument of such new era warfare .<br />
Simultaneously attacking these essential components rather<br />
than concentrating solely on enemy armed forces is the essence<br />
of Warden's strategy . Warden believes that the five-ring analysis<br />
gives us a good picture of what to strike, and that we must view<br />
"the enemy as a system, not an independent mass of tanks,<br />
aircraft, or dope pushers ." Warden's goal is "to make the cost<br />
political, economic, and military-to the enemy higher than he is<br />
willing to pay, or to impose strategic or operational paralysis on<br />
him so that he would become incapable of acting ."<br />
Col Szafranski, however, questions whether proposals like<br />
Col Warden's aiming at the "simultaneous reduction of the<br />
enemy systems overall energy level, so that the organic system<br />
goes into shock" are really new. Is attacking the various centers<br />
99