BATTLEFIELD OF THE FUTURE

More documents

Recommendations

Info

THE BIOLOGICAL-WEAPON terms of rapid diagnosis, effective medical treatment, and a responsive surge capability to administer to large numbers of biological warfare-exposed patients . The intelligence community must be strengthened and sensitized in its efforts to gather data on the biological warfare threat . More resources should be directed toward identifying biological warfare threats by human and national technical means . This is especially important to deter terrorism in the interim until human intelligence and national technical means can provide more definitive answers about who are the haves and have nots . Finally, United States and allied political leadership should articulate a clear retaliatory policy against the use of any weapon of mass destruction . This was an effective deterrent on both sides during the cold war, and it appears to have deterred Saddam Hussein during Desert Storm . Perhaps even more importantly, this policy must be supported by unrelenting resolve to actually carry out the retaliation . Since countering BW is an issue that crosses many government agency borders, the direction of the effort should come from a multi-agency steering group . This steering group initially should include principals or primary deputies from the Office of the White House, Department of Defense, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Public Health Service, Central Intelligence Agency, and Department of Justice . Wellversed technical and operational advisors will be essential to steer the effort . Many of these agencies already have ongoing programs, but there is little senior-level cohesion to these fragmented endeavors . Additionally, some of these efforts have demonstrated blatant parochialism . A multi-agency steering group would overcome these stovepipe attitudes and efforts, placing emphasis on national interests and prioritizing accordingly. Conclusions Biological warfare has been a threat for decades if not centuries . Yet the United States is ill-prepared to defend against or counter it-why? One view is that "the United States has a 22 1
BATTLEFIELD OF THE FUTURE tendency to wish the problem would go away because it seems too unsavory and too difficult to handle ."69 Another skeptic says, "We don't need it [BW defense] because we have a treaty ."7° It seems the real issue is the apparent imbalance between demonstrated threat versus resources expended to meet that biological warfare threat . In the case of biological warfare, the fixes are technically difficult and they will not be low-cost . Weigh this against a threat that has not yet fully manifested itself. It almost seems logical that decision makers would be reluctant to spend scarce resources against a heretofore invisible threat . However, the United States is moving toward a more aggressive counter-BW program . In February 1995, the White House published a national security strategy that said : U.S . forces must be prepared to deter, prevent and defend against their use . The United States will retain the capacity to retaliate against those who might contemplate the use of weapons of mass destruction, so that the costs of such use will be seen as outweighing the gains . However, to minimize the impact of proliferation of weapons of mass destruction on our interests, we will need the capability not only to deter their use against either ourselves or our allies and friends, but also, where necessary and feasible, to prevent it . We are placing a high priority on improving our ability to locate, identify, and disable arsenals of weapons of mass destruction, production and storage facilities for such weapons, and their delivery systems . To minimize the vulnerability of our forces abroad to weapons of mass destruction, we are placing a high priority on improving our ability to locate, identify and disable arsenals of weapons of mass destruction, production and storage facilities for such weapons, and their delivery systems .71 This is a step in the right direction, but it needs to be a giant step . The biological warfare threat looms . The United States must have the capability to detect, preempt, and protect before someone strikes us or our allies with a poor man's nuke . Epilogue-9 January This is a CNN special report live from the Anthrax Task Force Center Miami. T9us morning, the fatality count was 16,437. TMs grim figure was just given to us by doctors here. Unfortunately, 222
Page 2 and 3:
BATTLEFIELD OF THE FUTURE 21st Cent
Page 4 and 5:
To Keegie (eSchneider) who so fully
Page 6 and 7:
Battlefield of the Future 21st Cent
Page 8 and 9:
Acknowledgments We, the editors, wi
Page 10 and 11:
Introduction This is a book about s
Page 12 and 13:
the outset of a conflict. This will
Page 14 and 15:
Chapter 1 Principles of War for the
Page 16 and 17:
PRINCIPLES OF WAR by the proliferat
Page 18 and 19:
PRINCIPLES OF WAR should not be eng
Page 20 and 21:
PRINCIPLES OF WAR Some would argue
Page 22 and 23:
PRINCIPLES OF WAR designed to fight
Page 24 and 25:
PRINCIPLES OF WAR presenting the en
Page 26 and 27:
PRINCIPLES OF WAR Col John Warden,
Page 28 and 29:
PRINCIPLES OF WAR allied forces in
Page 30 and 31:
PRINCIPLES OF WAR The enemy WMD thr
Page 32 and 33:
PRINCIPLES OF WAR military operatio
Page 34 and 35:
PRINCIPLES OF WAR politically in Ir
Page 36 and 37:
PRINCIPLES OF WAR Moreover, as Sadd
Page 38 and 39:
PRINCIPLES OF WAR The Principle of
Page 40 and 41:
PRINCIPLES OF WAR Until the NASTI r
Page 42 and 43:
PRINCIPLES OF WAR S - Simultaneity
Page 44 and 45:
PRINCIPLES OF WAR effective logisti
Page 46 and 47:
PRINCIPLES OF WAR organizations, el
Page 48 and 49:
PRINCIPLES OF WAR Notes 1 . Rogue s
Page 50 and 51:
PRINCIPLES OF WAR attempted to fost
Page 52 and 53:
Overview : New Era Warfare? A Revol
Page 54 and 55:
NEW ERAWARFARE? Patriot, which was
Page 56 and 57:
Chapter 2 New-Era Warfare Gen Charl
Page 58 and 59:
NEW-ERA WARFARE many nations that a
Page 60 and 61:
NEW-ERAWARFARE brilliant decision o
Page 62 and 63:
NEW-ERAWARFARE The United States ca
Page 64 and 65:
NEW-ERA WARFARE Terminal-phase Inte
Page 66 and 67:
NEW-ERAWARFARE have to fight for th
Page 68 and 69:
NEW-ERAWARFARE might retaliate with
Page 70 and 71:
NEW-ERAWARFARE Our nuclear-weapons
Page 72 and 73:
NEW-ERAWARFARE to our disadvantage,
Page 74 and 75:
Chapter 3 The Revolution in Militar
Page 76 and 77:
THE REVOLUTION IN MILITARY AFFAIRS
Page 78 and 79:
Page 80 and 81:
Page 82 and 83:
Page 84 and 85:
Page 86 and 87:
Page 88 and 89:
Page 90 and 91:
Page 92 and 93:
Page 94 and 95:
Page 96 and 97:
Page 98 and 99:
Page 100 and 101:
Page 102 and 103:
Page 104 and 105:
Page 106 and 107:
Page 108 and 109:
Overview : Future Airpower and Stra
Page 110 and 111:
FUTURE AIRPOWER AND STRATEGY ISSUES
Page 112 and 113:
Chapter 4 Air Theory for the Twenty
Page 114 and 115:
AIRTHEORY FORTHE TWENTY-FIRST CENTU
Page 116 and 117:
AIRTHEORY FORTHETWENTY-FIRST CENTUR
Page 118 and 119:
Page 120 and 121:
Page 122 and 123:
Page 124 and 125:
AIRTHEORY FOR THETWENTY-FIRST CENTU
Page 126 and 127:
Page 128 and 129:
Page 130 and 131:
AIR THEORY FORTHE TWENTY-FIRST CENT
Page 132 and 133:
AIR THEORY FOR THE TWENTY-FIRST CEN
Page 134 and 135:
Chapter 5 Parallel War and Hyperwar
Page 136 and 137:
PARALLEL WARAND HYPERWAR In this ta
Page 138 and 139:
PARALLEL WAR AND HYPERWAR due to th
Page 140 and 141:
PARALLEL WARAND HYPERWAR albeit som
Page 142 and 143:
PARALLEL WARAND HYPERWAR are essent
Page 144 and 145:
PARALLEL WARAND HYPERWAR The realit
Page 146 and 147:
PARALLEL WARAND HYPERWAR Airpower-A
Page 148 and 149:
PARALLEL WARAND HYPERWAR Defeating
Page 150 and 151:
PARALLEL WARAND HYPERWAR " When att
Page 152 and 153:
PARALLEL WARAND HYPERWAR SIOP, it i
Page 154 and 155:
PARALLEL WAR AND HYPERWAR 11 . "Inf
Page 156 and 157:
PARALLEL WARAND HYPERWAR mass in sp
Page 158 and 159:
Overview : Information Warfare Issu
Page 160 and 161:
INFORMATION WARFARE ISSUES per day;
Page 162 and 163:
Chapter 6 Information War - Cyberwa
Page 164 and 165:
INFORMATION WAR - CYBERWAR - NEIWAR
Page 166 and 167:
INFORMATIONWAR - CYBERWAR - NETWAR
Page 168 and 169:
INFORMATION WAR - CYBERWAR - NETWAR
Page 170 and 171:
Page 172 and 173:
Page 174 and 175:
INFORMATIONWAR - CYBERWAR - NETWAR
Page 176 and 177:
Page 178 and 179:
Page 180 and 181: Chapter 7 Information Warfare : Imp
Page 182 and 183: INFORMATION WARFARE exploiting our
Page 184 and 185: INFORMATION WARFARE sufficient . He
Page 186 and 187: INFORMATION WARFARE now-whether the
Page 188 and 189: INFORMATION WARFARE it, convinced C
Page 190 and 191: INFORMATION WARFARE Jr.45 Conceived
Page 192 and 193: INFORMATIONWARFARE deception nets,
Page 194 and 195: INFORMATIONWARFARE The Joint Commun
Page 196 and 197: INFORMATION WARFARE but a limited n
Page 198 and 199: INFORMATIONWARFARE adversary . We h
Page 200 and 201: INFORMATIONWARFARE example, to stov
Page 202 and 203: INFORMATIONWARFARE Interestingly, o
Page 204 and 205: INFORMATION WARFARE avenue to emplo
Page 206 and 207: INFORMATION WARFARE 21 . Ibid ., 16
Page 208 and 209: INFORMATION WARFARE 68 . Petersen,
Page 210 and 211: Overview: Biological Warfare Issues
Page 212 and 213: BIOLOGICAL WARFARE ISSUES airliners
Page 214 and 215: Chapter 8 The Biological Weapon : A
Page 216 and 217: THEBIOLOGICAL WEAPON the terrorist
Page 218 and 219: THE BIOLOGICAL WEAPON Biological Wa
Page 220 and 221: THE BIOLOGICAL WEAPON Another incid
Page 222 and 223: THE BIOLOGICAL WEAPON The defector
Page 224 and 225: THE BIOLOGICAL WEAPON advanced prog
Page 226 and 227: THE BIOLOGICAL WEAPON agents may al
Page 228 and 229: THE BIOLOGICAL WEAPON higher by ord
Page 232 and 233: THE BIOLOGICAL WEAPON they say the
Page 234 and 235: THE BIOLOGICALWEAPON 43 . "Biologic
Page 236 and 237: Chapter 9 Twenty-First Century Germ
Page 238 and 239: TWENTY-FIRST CENTURY GERM WARFARE u
Page 240 and 241: TWENTY-FIRST CENTURYGERM WARFARE fo
Page 242 and 243: 'TWENTY-FIRST CENTURY GERM WARFARE
Page 244 and 245: BATTLEFIELD OF THE FUTURE the grisl
Page 246 and 247: BATTLEFIELD OF THE FUTURE pursue BW
Page 248 and 249: TWENTY-FIRST CENTURY GERM WARFARE c
Page 250 and 251: TWENTY-FIRST CENTURY GERM WARFARE i
Page 252 and 253: TWENTY-FIRST CENTURY GERM WARFARE f
Page 254 and 255: TWENTY-FIRST CENTURY GERM WARFARE b
Page 256 and 257: TWENTY-FIRST CENTURYGERM WARFARE ma
Page 258 and 259: TWENTY-FIRST CENTURY GERM WARFARE N
Page 260 and 261: Chapter 10 Biological Weapons for W
Page 262 and 263: BIOLOGICAL WEAPONS FORWAGING ECONOM
Page 264 and 265: BIOLOGICAL WEAPONS FOR WAGING ECONO
Page 274 and 275: BIOLOGICAL WEAPONS FOR WAGING ECONO
Page 276 and 277: Chapter 11 On Twenty-first Century
Page 278 and 279: warfare, space war, precision warfa
Page 280 and 281:
example, where the United States as
Page 282 and 283:
5,500 more . This group also had be
Page 284 and 285:
About the Contributors James Blackw
Page 286 and 287:
College . A retired US Navy command
Page 288 and 289:
finishing a book on "Counterprolife
show all

BATTLEFIELD OF THE FUTURE

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?