07.10.2015 Views

heraldryofyorkmi01custuoft

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

He was probably buried in<br />

THE DE MAULEYS. 105<br />

the Minster, for in Torre's account of the<br />

"funeral monuments in the south aisle" (p. 148) he says "On the north<br />

" side, last under the south-west pillar of the lanthorn, lyes an old<br />

" monument, cutt in white stone, with the effigy of a knight in a coat of<br />

" mail, and other compleat armour, a sword by his side, and military bend<br />

" charged with three eagletts, his hands conjoyned at prayer, and his legs<br />

" across, with a lyon dormant at his feet. And on his left side is a large<br />

" shield of his arms, viz. or a bend three eaglets displayed."<br />

There is a paper in the Archizologia (vol. xxxi. p. 238) about this stone,<br />

which seems to have been given by Mr. Thiselton, the then chapter-clerk,<br />

in whose garden<br />

it had been placed after the fire in 1829, to Sir Samuel<br />

Meyrick, who had deposited<br />

it in the chapel<br />

of Goodrich Court.<br />

Stephen de Mauley, the archdeacon, died, according to an entry in<br />

the Archbishop's registry, in 1317. And we may conclude that John, the<br />

remaining one mentioned, was also a brother. Why the archdeacon should<br />

hold up what seems to be John's shield, charged with three eagles, I cannot<br />

say possibly the shields may have been changed before Torre's time, and<br />

;<br />

the shield with the red bend (the tincture changed for difference) has been<br />

placed in the hands of another figure. I cannot discern any trace of that<br />

shield having been moved, and it seems to harmonize with the dress of<br />

the figure which holds it. But the figure next to the archdeacon, holding<br />

the shield, vaire a maunche gules, I fancy to be the figure of Peter, fourth<br />

baron, as this, as I will<br />

of the family.<br />

shew by and by, would be the principal quartering<br />

According to Torre, three shields, since destroyed,<br />

were in the window<br />

beneath ;<br />

i.e. in the north-eastern light, now occupied by the shield of<br />

Fenton (azure, six hawks' heads or), the arms of Malbis, argent, a chevron<br />

between three hinds' heads gules ;<br />

in the centre light, or, a fesse gules,<br />

three torteaux in chief; and in the western light, or a fesse dancette sable,<br />

Vavasour. I venture to think that Torre was mistaken as to the two<br />

former, in consequence of the similarity of the coats, and that they should<br />

have been described as (i) argent, a chevron between three fowls' heads,<br />

Furnival, which difference in the ordinary coat seems to be still carried by<br />

one branch of the family, viz., Furnival of Blagsdon (Burke) ; (2) or, two<br />

bars gules, in chief two torteaux, Wake.<br />

This would make their significance quite clear, viz., the alliances<br />

formed by the only two of this generation who married. Wake being<br />

the shield of Baldwin, Lord de Wake, whose daughter, we are told in the<br />

Hotham pedigree, married John de Mauley, who inherited the lands, and<br />

therefore acquired the name of Hotham. Furnival being the coat of<br />

Eleanor, daughter of Thomas, Lord Furnival, who married Peter, fourth<br />

Baron de Mauley and Vavasour that of Walter de Vavasour, who married<br />

;<br />

her sister, Alyne or Alianora.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!