07.10.2015 Views

heraldryofyorkmi01custuoft

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

THE SCROPES. 85<br />

speak of Sir Robert Grosvenor or his ancestors, or of anyone bearing the<br />

name of Grosvenor.<br />

Two of those summoned, viz., John Leycester and Sir John Pole,<br />

could not or would not remember anything. Sir John Brereton was stoutly<br />

contumacious, refused to give any evidence, and was fined ^20.<br />

It is interesting, too, to notice the early age at which many of them<br />

were " armed," i.e. entered on service in the field ;<br />

some as early as ten years<br />

of age, many at fourteen or sixteen, while the majority were under twenty.<br />

Many, on the other hand, had attained a great age. Many over sixty years ;<br />

indeed, John Thirlewalle deposed that his father, when he died, was of the<br />

age of seven score and five ans and ("vii. v.") i.e. 145, and had been armed<br />

during sixty-nine years. But Sir Harris Nicolas thinks " either that the<br />

"deponent was mistaken about his father's age, or that the person who<br />

" took down his statement, or he who copied<br />

it on the roll in the Tower,<br />

"committed an error on the subject." Sir R. Roos, 76; Sir Thomas Roos<br />

of Kendal, 80; William Heselrigg, 70; Sir John Chydioke, 100 and upwards;<br />

Sir John Sully of Iddesleigh, Devon, 105 years. He had passed<br />

the greater part of his life in the field, and was the hero of a hundred<br />

battles ;<br />

but now, overcome with the infirmities of advanced years, his<br />

evidence, together with that of his old and faithful squire, Richard Baker,<br />

was taken at his own home.<br />

Eventually the Constable gave judgment in favour of "Mr. Scrope,"<br />

and allowed "Mr. Grosvenor" the same arms, with a white border, adjudging<br />

him to pay the costs. But he utterly refused both arms and judgment, and<br />

appealed to the King, who on 27th May, 1390, gave judgment in the<br />

great chamber of Parliament, in his palace at Westminster, to the same<br />

effect. The bill for the expenses, amounting to ^466 135. 4^., was reduced<br />

by the " comyssaryes " appointed for the purpose to fifty marks. But as<br />

the said Robert would not appear, and was obstinate, it was again assessed<br />

by the King, on Monday, 3rd of October, first day of Parliament, at 500<br />

marks. "<br />

Wch seid som' of v c m'ks the seyd Sir Robert Grosvenor<br />

-<br />

" requested the seyd Sir Rychard Scrope to forgive him, who agayne<br />

" awnsweryd that he had so ivell usyd hym and belyed hym in his answers,<br />

" that he des'vyd no courtesye. Who agayne aunswered that hyt<br />

was not<br />

"his doings, but his counsellors, to make his mattre seame the bettre,<br />

" and that he knewe he dyd not well nor seyd trewle therein. Wheruppon<br />

" he agayne aunsweryd that yf he wolde so openlye declare, pr'fesse, and<br />

" confesse, and be content, it shuld be so enteryd of recourde, wch he<br />

" requestyd the Kinge hit myght be, that then he wold forgyve<br />

;<br />

hym wch<br />

" was done accordinglye, and the som forgeven, and they made frynds<br />

" afor the Kinge in the P'lyament howsse." And so the great cause<br />

celebre of Heraldry concluded.<br />

M

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!