07.10.2015 Views

heraldryofyorkmi01custuoft

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

THE HERALDRY OF YORK MINSTER.<br />

Originally these were " dimidiated," as it was called, i.e. each shield was<br />

cut exactly in half. Edmund, Earl of Cornwall, son of Richard, the brother<br />

of Henry III., married Margaret, daughter of Richard de Clare, and on his<br />

seal, given in Sandford's Genealogical History, carried the arms of the Earls<br />

of Cornwall, argent a lion rampant gules crowned or, within a bordure sable<br />

bezante, dimidiated with the arms of Clare, or three chevronels gules. In<br />

the same book we find the arms of Eleanor de Bohun, wife of Thomas,<br />

Duke of Gloucester, youngest son of Edward III., impaled with those of<br />

her husband (p. 125), by<br />

which the arms on both<br />

sides of the shield, though<br />

reduced in size, are kept<br />

entire. This has been<br />

invariably the subsequent<br />

practice, though on the<br />

seal of Mary, Queen of<br />

Scots, her marriage with<br />

the Dauphin of France is<br />

dimidiated with the entire<br />

shield of Scotland.<br />

Of crests there is not one illustration in the Minster. Dallaway tells<br />

us that such an appendage was unknown to the Normans, who, on the<br />

authority of Montfaucon, denoted the rank of the individual by the number<br />

of bars of which the beauvoir or visor of the helmet consisted. The ancient<br />

Norman casque was composed of an iron frame-work, covered with leather,<br />

and quite flat at the top. Such we find on the seal of Richard, Earl of<br />

Cornwall, brother of Henry III., 1209-1271. The seal of his son Edmund,<br />

Earl of Cornwall, shews the helmet conical ;<br />

whereas the seal of Thomas,<br />

son of Edward Crouchback, Earl of Lancaster, 1245-1296, shews a crest<br />

a dragon, which Dallaway says<br />

is " the first instance." Crests were originally<br />

used in jousts, when the shield was not borne, or by the chief commanders<br />

in battle, and conceded by royal grant, confined to very few persons. In<br />

process of time the assumption of them has become universal. They are<br />

not held to be absolutely hereditable, but may be assumed. As women did<br />

not wear helmets, they were not deemed entitled to crests ;<br />

and indeed, in<br />

the fourth year of Queen Elizabeth, at a Chapter of Heralds held at<br />

Broiderers' Hall in London, it was expressly decreed that they should<br />

not assume them.<br />

The origin of supporters has been attributed by some* to the practice<br />

of tournaments, when the adventurers did not use their shields, which<br />

were generally suspended upon the barriers<br />

of<br />

and pavilions within the lists.<br />

*<br />

Dallaway's Heraldic Enquiries.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!