08.09.2016 Views

Revenue for Telecoms

2cdncba

2cdncba

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Revenue</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>Telecoms</strong> – Issues In-Depth | 127<br />

6.5 Enterprise contracts – Bill-and-hold and customer acceptance |<br />

Potential challenges may exist in determining the accounting <strong>for</strong> some<br />

delivery arrangements<br />

SEC SAB Topic 13<br />

[IAS 18.14]<br />

<strong>Revenue</strong> is not currently recognized if a telecom entity has not transferred to the<br />

customer the significant risks and rewards of ownership. For product sales, the<br />

risks and rewards are generally considered to be transferred when a product is<br />

delivered to the customer’s site – i.e. if the terms of the sale are ‘free-on-board’<br />

(FOB) destination, then legal title to the product passes to the customer when<br />

the product is handed over to the customer. When a product is shipped to the<br />

customer FOB shipping point, legal title passes and the risks and rewards are<br />

generally considered to have transferred to the customer when the product is<br />

handed over to the carrier. However, careful analysis of facts and circumstances<br />

is required.<br />

Indirect channels<br />

Many telecom entities sell through distributors and resellers. These transactions<br />

will require judgment to determine if the transfer of control occurs on delivery to<br />

the intermediary or when the good is resold to the end customer (see Section 10).<br />

6.5 Enterprise contracts – Bill-and-hold and<br />

customer acceptance<br />

Observation<br />

606-10-55-81<br />

[IFRS 15.B79]<br />

Large enterprise telecom contracts often include bill-and-hold arrangements and<br />

the related issues around customer acceptance, usually <strong>for</strong> equipment sales.<br />

Bill-and-hold arrangements occur when a telecom entity bills a customer <strong>for</strong> a<br />

product that it transfers at a point in time, but retains physical possession of the<br />

product until it is transferred to the customer at a future point in time – e.g. due<br />

to a customer’s lack of available space <strong>for</strong> the product or delays in production<br />

schedules.<br />

606-10-55-82 – 55-83<br />

[IFRS 15.B80–B81]<br />

To determine the point in time at which a customer obtains control and there<strong>for</strong>e<br />

the point in time at which the per<strong>for</strong>mance obligation is satisfied, the telecom<br />

entity considers several indicators of the transfer of control, including whether<br />

the customer has accepted the goods or services (see 5.5.8 in Issues In-Depth,<br />

Edition 2016). For further guidance on bill-and-hold criteria, see 5.5.7 in Issues<br />

In-Depth, Edition 2016).<br />

© 2016 KPMG LLP, a Delaware limited liability partnership and the US member firm of the KPMG network of<br />

independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative, a Swiss entity. All rights reserved.<br />

© 2016 KPMG IFRG Limited, a UK company, limited by guarantee. All rights reserved.<br />

Home

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!