08.09.2016 Views

Revenue for Telecoms

2cdncba

2cdncba

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

20 | <strong>Revenue</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>Telecoms</strong> – Issues In-Depth<br />

| 2 Step 1: Identify the contract with a customer<br />

606-10-25-1<br />

[IFRS 15.9]<br />

A contract with a customer is in the scope of the new standard when it is legally<br />

en<strong>for</strong>ceable and it meets all of the following criteria.<br />

... collection of<br />

consideration is<br />

probable*<br />

... it has commercial<br />

substance<br />

A contract<br />

exists if...<br />

... rights to goods or<br />

services and<br />

payment terms can<br />

be identified<br />

... it is approved<br />

and the parties are<br />

committed to<br />

their obligations<br />

* The threshold differs under IFRS and US GAAP due to different meanings of the term ‘ probable ’.<br />

606-10-25-1e<br />

[IFRS 15.9(e)]<br />

606-10-25-6<br />

[IFRS 15.14]<br />

606-10-25-5<br />

[IFRS 15.13]<br />

606-10-25-7<br />

[IFRS 15.15]<br />

In making the collectibility assessment, an entity considers the customer’s ability<br />

and intention (which includes assessing its creditworthiness) to pay the amount of<br />

consideration when it is due. This assessment is made after taking into account any<br />

price concessions that the entity may offer to the customer (see 2.1.2).<br />

If the criteria are not initially met, then an entity continually reassesses the contract<br />

against them and applies the requirements of the new standard to the contract from<br />

the date on which the criteria are met. Any consideration received <strong>for</strong> a contract that<br />

does not meet the criteria is accounted <strong>for</strong> under the requirements set out in 2.2.<br />

If a contract meets all of the above criteria at contract inception, then an entity does<br />

not reassess the criteria unless there is an indication of a significant change in the<br />

facts and circumstances.<br />

If on reassessment an entity determines that the criteria are no longer met, then it<br />

ceases to apply the new standard to the contract from that date, but does not reverse<br />

any revenue previously recognized.<br />

Observations<br />

Most telecom contracts will not be ‘wholly unper<strong>for</strong>med’<br />

605-10-25-4<br />

ASU 2014-09.BC36, BC50<br />

[IFRS 15.12, BC36, BC50]<br />

A contract does not exist if each contracting party has the unilateral right to<br />

terminate a wholly unper<strong>for</strong>med contract without compensating the other<br />

party (or parties). However, this guidance will not apply to most typical telecom<br />

contracts in which at contract inception (or very shortly thereafter) either the<br />

customer per<strong>for</strong>ms by paying or the entity per<strong>for</strong>ms by transferring a good<br />

or service.<br />

Telecom entities will, however, need to consider the remaining criteria when<br />

determining whether a contract exists, including the collectibility criterion<br />

(see 2.1.2 and 2.2). Entities will also need to determine the contract term<br />

(see 2.1.1).<br />

Home<br />

© 2016 KPMG LLP, a Delaware limited liability partnership and the US member firm of the KPMG network of<br />

independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative, a Swiss entity. All rights reserved.<br />

© 2016 KPMG IFRG Limited, a UK company, limited by guarantee. All rights reserved.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!