08.09.2016 Views

Revenue for Telecoms

2cdncba

2cdncba

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

142 | <strong>Revenue</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>Telecoms</strong> – Issues In-Depth<br />

| 7 Contract costs<br />

Presentation of amortization costs<br />

If a telecom entity chooses to present its expenses by nature, then judgment will<br />

be required to determine the nature of the expenses arising from the amortization<br />

of capitalized contract costs. In all cases, a telecom entity is subject to the general<br />

requirement to ensure that its presentation is not misleading and is relevant to an<br />

understanding of its financial statements.<br />

Comparison with current US GAAP<br />

No correlation with the accounting <strong>for</strong> nonrefundable up-front fees<br />

SEC SAB Topic 13<br />

Current SEC guidance on revenue recognition indicates that registrants are<br />

required to defer nonrefundable up-front fees if they are not in exchange <strong>for</strong><br />

goods delivered or services per<strong>for</strong>med that represent the culmination of a<br />

separate earnings process. These fees are deferred and recognized as revenue<br />

over the expected period of per<strong>for</strong>mance, which may include expected renewal<br />

periods if the expected life of the contract extends beyond the initial period.<br />

Similarly, the guidance states that a telecom entity may elect an accounting policy<br />

of deferring certain set-up costs or customer acquisition costs.<br />

If the amount of deferred up-front fees exceeds the deferred costs, then these<br />

two amounts are recognized over the same period and in the same manner.<br />

However, if the amount of deferred costs exceeds the deferred revenue from<br />

any up-front fees, then current practice is somewhat mixed and some telecom<br />

entities may amortize the net deferred costs over the shorter of the estimated<br />

customer life and the stated contract period.<br />

The new standard effectively decouples the amortization of contract fulfillment<br />

costs from that <strong>for</strong> any nonrefundable up-front fees in the contract (see 9.1).<br />

The capitalization of qualifying fulfillment costs is not a policy election (see 7.2).<br />

The amortization period <strong>for</strong> contract cost assets is determined in a manner<br />

substantially similar to that under current guidance when up-front fees result in an<br />

equal or greater amount of deferred revenue – i.e. the existing contract plus any<br />

anticipated renewals that the telecom entity can specifically identify. However,<br />

contract costs that were previously deferred without any corresponding deferred<br />

revenue may be amortized over a longer period under the new standard than<br />

under current US GAAP.<br />

Home<br />

© 2016 KPMG LLP, a Delaware limited liability partnership and the US member firm of the KPMG network of<br />

independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative, a Swiss entity. All rights reserved.<br />

© 2016 KPMG IFRG Limited, a UK company, limited by guarantee. All rights reserved.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!