08.09.2016 Views

Revenue for Telecoms

2cdncba

2cdncba

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Revenue</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>Telecoms</strong> – Issues In-Depth | 17<br />

1.4 Portfolio approach |<br />

Alternative revenue programs <strong>for</strong> regulated telecom services<br />

980-605-25-1 – 25-4, 606-10-50-4a As mentioned above, in some jurisdictions, telecom services are subject to rate<br />

regulation. Current US GAAP requirements on the recognition of regulatory<br />

assets and liabilities from alternative revenue programs are outside the scope<br />

of the new standard. However, the new standard requires revenue arising from<br />

regulatory assets and liabilities to be presented separately from revenue arising<br />

from contracts with customers in the statement of comprehensive income.<br />

The new standard only applies to the operations of rate-regulated entities <strong>for</strong><br />

ordinary activities that are not subject to rate regulation. Entities will continue<br />

to follow current US GAAP requirements to account <strong>for</strong> alternative revenue<br />

programs, because these contracts are considered to be contracts with a<br />

regulator and not with a customer. This may result in a difference <strong>for</strong> rateregulated<br />

entities with similar alternative revenue programs if they apply IFRS but<br />

are not eligible to apply the interim standard on regulatory deferral accounts.<br />

1.4 Portfolio approach<br />

Requirements of the new standard<br />

606-10-10-4<br />

[IFRS 15.4]<br />

The new standard is generally applied to an individual contract with a customer.<br />

However, as a practical expedient, an entity may apply the revenue model to a<br />

portfolio of contracts with similar characteristics if the entity reasonably expects<br />

that the financial statement effects of applying the new standard to the individual<br />

contracts within that portfolio would not differ materially.<br />

Example 5 – Portfolio approach applied to costs<br />

In April 20X8, Cable A store sold 100 television cable contracts. The store employs<br />

several sales agents who will receive a bonus of 10 <strong>for</strong> each contract they obtain.<br />

Cable A determines that each bonus constitutes a cost of obtaining a contract<br />

(see 7.1) and should be capitalized and amortized over the life of that underlying<br />

contract and any anticipated renewal that the bonus benefits (see 7.3).<br />

Cable A determines that the portfolio approach is appropriate because the costs<br />

are all related to obtaining a contract and the characteristics of the contracts<br />

are similar. The amortization period <strong>for</strong> the asset recognized related to these<br />

costs is expected to be similar <strong>for</strong> the 100 contracts (see 7.3). Additionally, Cable<br />

A documents that the portfolio approach does not materially differ from the<br />

contract-by-contract approach. Instead of recording and monitoring 100 assets of<br />

10 each, Cable A records a portfolio asset of 1,000 <strong>for</strong> the month of April 20X8.<br />

© 2016 KPMG LLP, a Delaware limited liability partnership and the US member firm of the KPMG network of<br />

independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative, a Swiss entity. All rights reserved.<br />

© 2016 KPMG IFRG Limited, a UK company, limited by guarantee. All rights reserved.<br />

Home

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!