College Writing 3-1
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
68 Chapter 2 Evaluating Web Design<br />
Tyler's Evaluation Chart<br />
Scoring System:<br />
@@ @@@ @@@@ @@@@@<br />
Very poor Poor Average Above Average Excellent<br />
Website A: Nike's athletic shoes, Airmax Tailwind<br />
Website B: 5aucony's athletic shoes, Grid 0mni 3<br />
(riterion Score Reasons<br />
Site A<br />
Site B<br />
1. Layout<br />
@@@<br />
@@<br />
@@@<br />
@<br />
Website A is extremely well laid<br />
out-very com partmenta lized.<br />
More options at bottom of page.<br />
Seems to work better. Site B has<br />
options on the top/sides, all over.<br />
lncludes almost the same<br />
options-shoe info, colors, other<br />
shoes (similar products).<br />
z. Visual Appeal<br />
(olors more soothing and<br />
@@@<br />
@@<br />
@@<br />
appealing on site A (blues and<br />
greens) while site B used mostly<br />
bright orange. Overall "feeling" of<br />
B: cluttered. But A is easy to look<br />
at, evenly put together although<br />
right side lacks visual appeal.<br />
s. Graphics<br />
@@@ @@@<br />
Pictures of the main product are<br />
comparable. However, site B<br />
allows a look at the sole of the<br />
shoe and a 360" view. Site A<br />
doesn't offer this.
Change language