D2.1 Requirements and Specification - CORBYS
D2.1 Requirements and Specification - CORBYS
D2.1 Requirements and Specification - CORBYS
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
<strong>D2.1</strong> <strong>Requirements</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Specification</strong><br />
Indicative priority M<strong>and</strong>atory<br />
Requirement No.: UIREF4<br />
Name: Identification of benchmarks<br />
Description: For the purpose of the benchmarking exercise, the <strong>CORBYS</strong> system viewed generically as a<br />
meta-controller controlling semi-autonomous sub-systems can be specified with respect to the<br />
identified terms of reference so as to be able to conduct comparative studies with existing<br />
meta-controllers that can be identified as comparable with respect to the established terms of<br />
reference. Thus the work entails the establishment of meta-controller comparators so that the<br />
performance of the <strong>CORBYS</strong> controller can be evaluated <strong>and</strong> compared with other<br />
comparable meta-controllers within a formal benchmarking framework.<br />
Reason /<br />
Comments:<br />
Indicative priority M<strong>and</strong>atory<br />
Requirement No.: UIREF5<br />
Name: Identification of evaluation metrics <strong>and</strong> procedures<br />
Description: To identify the evaluation metrics <strong>and</strong> specify the evaluation procedures to be followed in<br />
<strong>CORBYS</strong>.<br />
Reason /<br />
Comments:<br />
Indicative priority M<strong>and</strong>atory<br />
Requirement No.: UIREF6<br />
Name: Ethical assurance<br />
Description: To identify the evaluation metrics <strong>and</strong> specify the evaluation procedures to be followed in<br />
<strong>CORBYS</strong> in the context of ethical assurance <strong>and</strong> user involvement.<br />
Reason /<br />
Comments:<br />
Indicative priority M<strong>and</strong>atory<br />
Output<br />
Requirement No.: UIREF7<br />
Name: Set of metrics, procedures, benchmarks, ethical assurance <strong>and</strong> evaluation methodology<br />
Description: Comprehensive list of identified evaluation metrics <strong>and</strong> procedures to be followed in<br />
<strong>CORBYS</strong>. For benchmarking, the terms of reference by referring to generic properties of the<br />
required control performance:<br />
1. Dynamicity: typical real-time response (e.g. in ms)<br />
2. Complexity of Control: Number of states of each sub-system <strong>and</strong> number of states of<br />
control transition dynamics between the two systems<br />
3. Required Control Envelope: Number of spatio-temporal dimensions of required<br />
control, e.g. linear motion, rotational motion, 2D, 3D, etc<br />
4. Delivered Performance Envelope: Dynamicity, complexity <strong>and</strong> dimensionality levels<br />
of the controller<br />
Reason / Comments:<br />
Indicative priority M<strong>and</strong>atory<br />
9.1.1.2 Interfaces<br />
Requirement No.: UIREF8<br />
Name: Evaluation of <strong>CORBYS</strong> outcomes<br />
Description: The formulated evaluation methodology, identified benchmarks, metrics <strong>and</strong> procedures will<br />
be used in the Evaluation WP<br />
95