11.12.2012 Views

D2.1 Requirements and Specification - CORBYS

D2.1 Requirements and Specification - CORBYS

D2.1 Requirements and Specification - CORBYS

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>D2.1</strong> <strong>Requirements</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Specification</strong><br />

Indicative priority M<strong>and</strong>atory<br />

Requirement No.: UIREF4<br />

Name: Identification of benchmarks<br />

Description: For the purpose of the benchmarking exercise, the <strong>CORBYS</strong> system viewed generically as a<br />

meta-controller controlling semi-autonomous sub-systems can be specified with respect to the<br />

identified terms of reference so as to be able to conduct comparative studies with existing<br />

meta-controllers that can be identified as comparable with respect to the established terms of<br />

reference. Thus the work entails the establishment of meta-controller comparators so that the<br />

performance of the <strong>CORBYS</strong> controller can be evaluated <strong>and</strong> compared with other<br />

comparable meta-controllers within a formal benchmarking framework.<br />

Reason /<br />

Comments:<br />

Indicative priority M<strong>and</strong>atory<br />

Requirement No.: UIREF5<br />

Name: Identification of evaluation metrics <strong>and</strong> procedures<br />

Description: To identify the evaluation metrics <strong>and</strong> specify the evaluation procedures to be followed in<br />

<strong>CORBYS</strong>.<br />

Reason /<br />

Comments:<br />

Indicative priority M<strong>and</strong>atory<br />

Requirement No.: UIREF6<br />

Name: Ethical assurance<br />

Description: To identify the evaluation metrics <strong>and</strong> specify the evaluation procedures to be followed in<br />

<strong>CORBYS</strong> in the context of ethical assurance <strong>and</strong> user involvement.<br />

Reason /<br />

Comments:<br />

Indicative priority M<strong>and</strong>atory<br />

Output<br />

Requirement No.: UIREF7<br />

Name: Set of metrics, procedures, benchmarks, ethical assurance <strong>and</strong> evaluation methodology<br />

Description: Comprehensive list of identified evaluation metrics <strong>and</strong> procedures to be followed in<br />

<strong>CORBYS</strong>. For benchmarking, the terms of reference by referring to generic properties of the<br />

required control performance:<br />

1. Dynamicity: typical real-time response (e.g. in ms)<br />

2. Complexity of Control: Number of states of each sub-system <strong>and</strong> number of states of<br />

control transition dynamics between the two systems<br />

3. Required Control Envelope: Number of spatio-temporal dimensions of required<br />

control, e.g. linear motion, rotational motion, 2D, 3D, etc<br />

4. Delivered Performance Envelope: Dynamicity, complexity <strong>and</strong> dimensionality levels<br />

of the controller<br />

Reason / Comments:<br />

Indicative priority M<strong>and</strong>atory<br />

9.1.1.2 Interfaces<br />

Requirement No.: UIREF8<br />

Name: Evaluation of <strong>CORBYS</strong> outcomes<br />

Description: The formulated evaluation methodology, identified benchmarks, metrics <strong>and</strong> procedures will<br />

be used in the Evaluation WP<br />

95

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!