14.12.2012 Views

The Network Society - University of Massachusetts Amherst

The Network Society - University of Massachusetts Amherst

The Network Society - University of Massachusetts Amherst

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Canada has probably gone furthest in the deliberate targeting <strong>of</strong><br />

user satisfaction with services, addressing the 5 main drivers <strong>of</strong> satisfaction<br />

(timeliness, knowledge, extra mile/smile, fairness, and outcomes)<br />

and showing a steady improvement between 1998 and 2002 at<br />

every level.<br />

<strong>The</strong>se evolutions <strong>of</strong> service delivery models raise some difficult<br />

issues. One is that each further state <strong>of</strong> evolution requires some shared<br />

data systems across organisational boundaries, and some common<br />

protocols. Some countries have felt able to adopt unique identifiers as<br />

in Finland; but in many others there is insufficient trust in the state to<br />

allow this. Another is that integration <strong>of</strong> services across boundaries<br />

may be easier for non-state organisations given the nature <strong>of</strong> bureaucratic<br />

and pr<strong>of</strong>essional interests: those states most willing to allow<br />

porousness across boundaries may reap gains fastest. A third is that<br />

these all enable more networked organisational structures with greater<br />

decentralisation <strong>of</strong> operational decision making in ways that are likely<br />

to threaten the power <strong>of</strong> middle tiers.<br />

All are in part about altering the mix <strong>of</strong> channels to maximise public<br />

value—which implies automating some services and intensifying<br />

the personal nature <strong>of</strong> others.<br />

Trust<br />

Reshaping the State and its Relationship with Citizens 231<br />

<strong>The</strong> most difficult area <strong>of</strong> public value has always been the third—<br />

trust. Here, the development <strong>of</strong> e government is bound up with the<br />

broader opening up <strong>of</strong> the state to scrutiny, and the changing nature<br />

<strong>of</strong> the conversation held between states and the public. <strong>The</strong> picture is<br />

complex. Most citizens relationships with states are abrupt, unsatisfying<br />

and disjointed—voting in an election, serving on a jury, receiving<br />

schooling, being paid pensions and so on. 3<br />

<strong>The</strong>re have been some common moves to reframe the environment<br />

for trust, including:<br />

• Greater use <strong>of</strong> pre-legislative scrutiny, with legislation online<br />

prior to its agreement<br />

3 See Touching the State, Design Council, London, 2004

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!