14.12.2012 Views

The Network Society - University of Massachusetts Amherst

The Network Society - University of Massachusetts Amherst

The Network Society - University of Massachusetts Amherst

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Challenges <strong>of</strong> the Global Information <strong>Society</strong> 343<br />

to; for additional information, see Castells and Himanen 2002;<br />

Himanen and Castells 2004b; Wong 2004):<br />

1. <strong>The</strong> “Silicon Valley model,” i.e. the American neo-liberalist model<br />

—the predominant model (United States)<br />

2. <strong>The</strong> “Singapore model,” i.e. the Asian state-run model in which<br />

the objective is to attract multinational companies to the region<br />

—an emerging model (also in China and India)<br />

3. <strong>The</strong> “Finnish model,” i.e. a European combination <strong>of</strong> the information<br />

society and the welfare state, which is represented in its<br />

most advanced form in the case <strong>of</strong> Finland.<br />

Outside these regions and models, the status <strong>of</strong> the poorest developing<br />

countries continues to weaken. For example, most <strong>of</strong> the African<br />

countries between the Sahara and South Africa are becoming pauperised.<br />

One-fifth <strong>of</strong> the world’s population subsists on less than a dollar<br />

a day and has no access to health care or education. A continuously<br />

widening knowledge divide underlies the increasing welfare divide.<br />

Each <strong>of</strong> the above models has currently problems that can be characterized<br />

with the following scenarios:<br />

1. <strong>The</strong> Silicon Valley model refers to the neo-liberalist scenario <strong>of</strong><br />

“leaving the weak behind.” Although this scenario is technologically<br />

and economically dynamic, it comes with a high social<br />

price. For example, the Silicon Valley area itself produced 60<br />

millionaires a day at the end <strong>of</strong> the 1990s, but they had to move<br />

to fenced residential areas, because a society that leaves some <strong>of</strong><br />

its citizens in the margin is a society <strong>of</strong> fear. One-fifth <strong>of</strong> the<br />

population lives below the poverty line, has no health insurance<br />

and is functionally illiterate. In Silicon Valley, the opportunities<br />

to receive education depend on the economic position <strong>of</strong> your<br />

family, so a class <strong>of</strong> marginalised people has emerged, for which<br />

crime is the only means <strong>of</strong> survival (particularly the sale <strong>of</strong> narcotics<br />

to those who have succeeded). Paradoxically, the world’s<br />

biggest proportion <strong>of</strong> the population that is in prison is in<br />

California, a leading region in terms <strong>of</strong> development! In addition,<br />

sending someone to prison for a year is more expensive for<br />

society than sending them to Harvard to study! <strong>The</strong> adoption <strong>of</strong><br />

the Silicon Valley model would mean unfettered neo-liberalism.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!