22.12.2012 Views

(the) American (Novel of)

(the) American (Novel of)

(the) American (Novel of)

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

On Being Becoming<br />

William Fenton writes, “There is a principle that students <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Iroquois<br />

must inevitably learn: <strong>the</strong> way a thing is done is <strong>of</strong>ten more important<br />

than <strong>the</strong> issue at stake.” 4 Who says what, in what order? On some<br />

occasions, such protocol makes all <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> difference. Who gets served<br />

first and last? Men? Women? Children? These are questions that really<br />

matter, sometimes maybe even more than proper moral issues, as<br />

Thorstein Veblen intimated when he wrote, “A breach <strong>of</strong> faith may be<br />

condoned, but a breach <strong>of</strong> decorum can not. ‘Manners maketh man.’ ” 5<br />

Of course, <strong>the</strong>re is also <strong>the</strong> utter indeterminacy and disorientation<br />

<strong>of</strong> those moments lost beyond meaning precisely because etiquette can<br />

find no purchase, moments when <strong>the</strong> architectonic <strong>of</strong> cordiality, civility,<br />

and consideration are rendered inoperative, that is, when people just<br />

don’t care. It is perhaps only at times <strong>of</strong> such absence, <strong>of</strong> such lack, that<br />

etiquette is understood in its full social and political, that is to say,<br />

material merit (just like Heidegger’s broken hammer).<br />

Some, <strong>the</strong>refore, might want to consider etiquette as ritual—ritual<br />

that binds, ritual that heals, ritual that sustains human interactions locally<br />

and globally. Tempting as this thought may be, we want to resist<br />

<strong>the</strong> desire to restrict etiquette to a question <strong>of</strong> formulaic or enforced<br />

codes. As Aristotle understood, good habits—and thus good manners—<br />

are gestures <strong>of</strong> grace beyond measure ra<strong>the</strong>r than <strong>of</strong> conformity to law<br />

as such, something truly fine. The practice <strong>of</strong> etiquette is not, finally,<br />

about mere compliance to external rules or static imperatives.<br />

As <strong>the</strong> chapters in this volume suggest, etiquette is about <strong>the</strong> execution<br />

and performance <strong>of</strong> those opportunities for consideration <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

o<strong>the</strong>r, whe<strong>the</strong>r stranger or friend, that emerge in everyday lived experience.<br />

Etiquette duly acknowledges <strong>the</strong> existence and necessity <strong>of</strong> boundaries<br />

while negotiating, respectfully traversing, and even transforming <strong>the</strong><br />

conditions that allow one to become presentable, and thus allow one to<br />

extend oneself to <strong>the</strong> world, as we extend ourselves to you.<br />

Notes<br />

1. Marcus Aurelius, Meditations, ed. and trans. C. R. Haines (Cambridge:<br />

Harvard University Press, 1994), p. 11.<br />

2. Mary Wollstonecraft, Vindication <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Rights <strong>of</strong> Woman (New York:<br />

Norton, 1988), p. 4.<br />

3. Alphonso Lingis, The Imperative (Bloomington: Indiana University<br />

Press, 1998), p. 2.<br />

5

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!