22.12.2012 Views

(the) American (Novel of)

(the) American (Novel of)

(the) American (Novel of)

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

152 Shannon Winnubst<br />

<strong>the</strong> political nihilism that results all too easily from it, <strong>the</strong> vague sense<br />

that aes<strong>the</strong>tics is <strong>the</strong> singular realm beyond <strong>the</strong> grasp <strong>of</strong> utility persists.<br />

Grappling with <strong>the</strong> seeming impossibility <strong>of</strong> thinking or living without<br />

utility, we most easily turn to aes<strong>the</strong>tics. “What is not useful?” After<br />

much searching, we comfort ourselves with <strong>the</strong> discovery <strong>of</strong> “style,<br />

aes<strong>the</strong>tics, art.” This is, after all, surely what Nietzsche had in mind<br />

when he beckoned us to turn away from <strong>the</strong> grave seriousness <strong>of</strong><br />

morality towards art, “where <strong>the</strong> lie is sanctified.” 1 Is not <strong>the</strong> sanctifying<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> lie, <strong>the</strong> undermining <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> grand epistemologies <strong>of</strong> truth, not<br />

also an evading <strong>of</strong> utility, modernity’s most forceful form <strong>of</strong> truth?<br />

It is a tempting solution, with radical possibilities. But perhaps also<br />

too obvious and simple. As Michel Foucault’s method, if not his explicit<br />

response, demonstrates, this valorizing <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> aes<strong>the</strong>tic as <strong>the</strong> realm<br />

exempted from <strong>the</strong> powerful barometer <strong>of</strong> utility may itself be an<br />

enactment <strong>of</strong> utility’s power. Indeed, as Georges Bataille argues over and<br />

over, utility may not be so easily eluded.<br />

Foucault repeatedly demonstrates <strong>the</strong> subtle mechanisms <strong>of</strong> boundary<br />

construction and controlled transgression performed in <strong>the</strong> emergence<br />

<strong>of</strong> categories. In volume one <strong>of</strong> The History <strong>of</strong> Sexuality, for<br />

example, he shows over and over how a normalizing category emerges<br />

through <strong>the</strong> careful construction <strong>of</strong> what lies beyond it. As an exemplar<br />

perhaps, heterosexuality emerges as a category <strong>of</strong> identity only against<br />

<strong>the</strong> emergence <strong>of</strong> homosexuality, <strong>the</strong> category <strong>of</strong> (apparent) transgression<br />

that finally serves to reinscribe <strong>the</strong> heterosexual as <strong>the</strong> norm.<br />

Bataille outlines similar functions in volume 2 <strong>of</strong> The Accursed Share,<br />

where he shows how behaviors are eroticized via prohibitions, demonstrating<br />

again how <strong>the</strong> transgression <strong>of</strong> set boundaries reenforces <strong>the</strong><br />

category transgressed. For Bataille (following Levi-Strauss), <strong>the</strong> exemplar<br />

is incest, where <strong>the</strong> prohibition against intergenerational sexual<br />

contact within biological families actually serves to eroticize familial ties,<br />

ensuring <strong>the</strong> continued flow <strong>of</strong> erotic energy in this o<strong>the</strong>rwise closed<br />

container. And finally, in more recent texts, Judith Butler helps to open<br />

<strong>the</strong> field <strong>of</strong> queer <strong>the</strong>ory by using <strong>the</strong>se strategies to show how <strong>the</strong> grasp<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> sex/gender distinction in feminist <strong>the</strong>ory effectively controls <strong>the</strong><br />

kinds <strong>of</strong> transgressions against <strong>the</strong> normative heterosexual matrix, limiting<br />

it to homosexuality ra<strong>the</strong>r than trans- or bi- or multisexualities. In all <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong>se texts, we learn to read categories as performative entities that, in<br />

delimiting <strong>the</strong>ir own boundaries, ensure that <strong>the</strong> transgression <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

category will only fur<strong>the</strong>r solidify <strong>the</strong> category.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!