22.12.2012 Views

(the) American (Novel of)

(the) American (Novel of)

(the) American (Novel of)

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

232 Thomas Thorp<br />

Beside myself Deucalion sired Prince Idomeneus,<br />

who set sail for Troy in his beaked ships <strong>of</strong> war,<br />

escorting Atreus’ sons. My own name is Aethon.<br />

I am <strong>the</strong> younger-born. (19:205–208)<br />

In <strong>the</strong> first version <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> lie he was <strong>the</strong> murderer <strong>of</strong> Idomeneus’s son. In<br />

<strong>the</strong> second version he was Castor, <strong>the</strong> illegitimate son <strong>of</strong> a wealthy Cretan,<br />

who had made his fortune in piracy and joined with Idomeneus as a leader<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Cretan contingent at Troy. In <strong>the</strong> third version he is <strong>the</strong> bro<strong>the</strong>r <strong>of</strong><br />

Idomeneus and he is able to make his way into Penelope’s heart by<br />

proving that he had met Odysseus, a claim made credible by <strong>the</strong> fact that<br />

he is able to describe <strong>the</strong> cloak and pin that Odysseus was wearing when<br />

he left for Troy. Of course to <strong>the</strong> extent that this identification renders<br />

his story credible, it would also seem to prove that he may not have seen<br />

Odysseus for twenty years. The stunning accuracy <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> cloak and pin<br />

description does not support <strong>the</strong> credibility <strong>of</strong> his subsequent claim that<br />

he had seen Odysseus’s treasure, and only just missed seeing <strong>the</strong> man<br />

himself, only days earlier in Thesprotia. 17 What is being achieved in this<br />

complex <strong>of</strong> lies? Why does he continue to lie to Penelope?<br />

The first lie (A<strong>the</strong>na) had invoked <strong>the</strong> legendary form <strong>of</strong> an<br />

etiquette depicted as an ethos <strong>of</strong> war and righteous murder. The second<br />

lie (Eumaeus) depicted a transitional passage that mimics Odysseus’s<br />

own voyage from war to Ithaca. The key to appreciating <strong>the</strong> politological<br />

significance <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> third lie (Penelope) is to note what seems to be an<br />

unnecessary complication. Given that <strong>the</strong> critical fact at play here is<br />

Odysseus’s imminent return, why does he claim to be <strong>the</strong> bro<strong>the</strong>r <strong>of</strong><br />

Idomeneus and to have met Odysseus, an event that would have occurred<br />

twenty years earlier?<br />

As I suggested above, if Odysseus is to reestablish order on Ithaca<br />

he must do so without declaring, first, that he is who he is. Ra<strong>the</strong>r, he<br />

must first establish a minimal order in which it will be possible for him<br />

to retake his proper position as king. Only <strong>the</strong> king can reestablish order<br />

(draw <strong>the</strong> bow), but <strong>the</strong> king can return, as king, only if <strong>the</strong>re is an order<br />

within which he can take that position. The aporia is characteristic <strong>of</strong> any<br />

account <strong>of</strong> political legitimacy: <strong>the</strong> original establishment <strong>of</strong> justice requires<br />

a prior idea <strong>of</strong> justice in terms <strong>of</strong> which <strong>the</strong> original act can justify itself.<br />

The complication that our man is <strong>the</strong> bro<strong>the</strong>r <strong>of</strong> Idomeneus is <strong>the</strong> ideal<br />

lie to confront this aporia. When Odysseus had landed on Crete, he had

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!