You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
10 Nickolas Pappas<br />
And it is possible to spell out what made comedy respectable.<br />
Richard Janko has argued persuasively that <strong>the</strong> medieval Greek manuscript<br />
known as <strong>the</strong> Tractatus Coislinianus (TC) is a condensation <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />
lost second book <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Poetics, on comedy. 1 And <strong>the</strong> Tractatus distinguishes<br />
comedy from abuse—marking comedy <strong>of</strong>f as superior by reason<br />
<strong>of</strong> this difference—as a genre that suggests <strong>the</strong> laughable qualities <strong>of</strong><br />
people instead <strong>of</strong> naming <strong>the</strong>m. 2<br />
In o<strong>the</strong>r words, comedy in general improves on abuse, as <strong>the</strong><br />
Ethics says that recent comedy improves on its older form, that is, as <strong>the</strong><br />
tactful wit improves on <strong>the</strong> buffoon. The evolution <strong>of</strong> comedy, which<br />
for Aristotle means its progress toward a perfected state (see Poetics<br />
1449a15 on <strong>the</strong> progress <strong>of</strong> tragedy and Politics 1252b32 on natural<br />
growth in general), consists in an improvement in its manners from<br />
raillery to dig.<br />
The Tractatus Coislinianus too speaks <strong>of</strong> older and newer comedies,<br />
and brings <strong>the</strong> Ethics to mind when it does: “[The kinds] <strong>of</strong> comedy<br />
are (a) old, which goes to excess in <strong>the</strong> laughable; (b) new, which<br />
abandons this, and inclines toward <strong>the</strong> grand; and (c) middle, which is<br />
mixed from both” (TC 18). 3 It does not matter precisely what <strong>the</strong><br />
Tractatus means by “old comedy” (almost certainly not what that phrase<br />
means today), as long as old comedy is <strong>the</strong> same thing here as in EN<br />
IV.8, namely <strong>the</strong> genre abandoned to <strong>the</strong> dustbin <strong>of</strong> literary history for<br />
its rudeness.<br />
The Etiquette <strong>of</strong> Comedy<br />
In ano<strong>the</strong>r sense all comedy, old and new, has rudeness for its subject.<br />
The Poetics says that comedy’s characters are worse than real human<br />
beings and a fortiori worse than comedy’s spectators (1448a17)—not<br />
worse with respect to every trait, but only in those ways that make <strong>the</strong><br />
characters funny. What is laughable, says Aristotle, is <strong>the</strong> kind <strong>of</strong> ugliness<br />
that causes no pain (1449a32–35), which is to say minor moral failure.<br />
The Tractatus Coislinianus explains comic ugliness. The characters<br />
that comedy depicts are <strong>the</strong> buffoon, <strong>the</strong> ironist, and <strong>the</strong> braggart (TC<br />
12). Notice that <strong>the</strong>se are all traits that EN II.7 has called excessive:<br />
irony for its untruthful understatement and <strong>the</strong> brag for its untruthful<br />
exaggeration, buffoonery in its intemperate pursuit <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> pleasure <strong>of</strong>