22.12.2012 Views

(the) American (Novel of)

(the) American (Novel of)

(the) American (Novel of)

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

10 Nickolas Pappas<br />

And it is possible to spell out what made comedy respectable.<br />

Richard Janko has argued persuasively that <strong>the</strong> medieval Greek manuscript<br />

known as <strong>the</strong> Tractatus Coislinianus (TC) is a condensation <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

lost second book <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Poetics, on comedy. 1 And <strong>the</strong> Tractatus distinguishes<br />

comedy from abuse—marking comedy <strong>of</strong>f as superior by reason<br />

<strong>of</strong> this difference—as a genre that suggests <strong>the</strong> laughable qualities <strong>of</strong><br />

people instead <strong>of</strong> naming <strong>the</strong>m. 2<br />

In o<strong>the</strong>r words, comedy in general improves on abuse, as <strong>the</strong><br />

Ethics says that recent comedy improves on its older form, that is, as <strong>the</strong><br />

tactful wit improves on <strong>the</strong> buffoon. The evolution <strong>of</strong> comedy, which<br />

for Aristotle means its progress toward a perfected state (see Poetics<br />

1449a15 on <strong>the</strong> progress <strong>of</strong> tragedy and Politics 1252b32 on natural<br />

growth in general), consists in an improvement in its manners from<br />

raillery to dig.<br />

The Tractatus Coislinianus too speaks <strong>of</strong> older and newer comedies,<br />

and brings <strong>the</strong> Ethics to mind when it does: “[The kinds] <strong>of</strong> comedy<br />

are (a) old, which goes to excess in <strong>the</strong> laughable; (b) new, which<br />

abandons this, and inclines toward <strong>the</strong> grand; and (c) middle, which is<br />

mixed from both” (TC 18). 3 It does not matter precisely what <strong>the</strong><br />

Tractatus means by “old comedy” (almost certainly not what that phrase<br />

means today), as long as old comedy is <strong>the</strong> same thing here as in EN<br />

IV.8, namely <strong>the</strong> genre abandoned to <strong>the</strong> dustbin <strong>of</strong> literary history for<br />

its rudeness.<br />

The Etiquette <strong>of</strong> Comedy<br />

In ano<strong>the</strong>r sense all comedy, old and new, has rudeness for its subject.<br />

The Poetics says that comedy’s characters are worse than real human<br />

beings and a fortiori worse than comedy’s spectators (1448a17)—not<br />

worse with respect to every trait, but only in those ways that make <strong>the</strong><br />

characters funny. What is laughable, says Aristotle, is <strong>the</strong> kind <strong>of</strong> ugliness<br />

that causes no pain (1449a32–35), which is to say minor moral failure.<br />

The Tractatus Coislinianus explains comic ugliness. The characters<br />

that comedy depicts are <strong>the</strong> buffoon, <strong>the</strong> ironist, and <strong>the</strong> braggart (TC<br />

12). Notice that <strong>the</strong>se are all traits that EN II.7 has called excessive:<br />

irony for its untruthful understatement and <strong>the</strong> brag for its untruthful<br />

exaggeration, buffoonery in its intemperate pursuit <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> pleasure <strong>of</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!