Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
88 Alison Leigh Brown<br />
my students to get tenure-track jobs. This is what I do when I am not<br />
writing on my current paper. (Swee<strong>the</strong>art, you would die to read it but<br />
it is two drafts away from that. It is a comment on <strong>the</strong> bitchiness<br />
underlying <strong>the</strong> civility in Austen’s middle-period novels. I am having<br />
ever so much fun with it and think it will be a perfect conference paper<br />
for <strong>the</strong> Literature and Civility conference—I’ve covered both bases,<br />
don’t you think? Then I can send it out, where I don’t know. Finally,<br />
it will be a good chapter for <strong>the</strong> book I’m working on too. So three<br />
birds with one stone, eh?)<br />
In any case, <strong>of</strong> course I will not help in sabotaging Kathy’s career.<br />
You are not mistaken in your assessment <strong>of</strong> her; she is an insipid,<br />
humorless little thing, but so what? The academy needs such creatures<br />
to function. Who else would do all that committee work? So enough<br />
<strong>of</strong> your petty meanness. Really darling you must move down here<br />
where manners abound. I fear that I do not believe in <strong>American</strong> culture.<br />
We are worlds apart from south to north. If we were to sabotage<br />
dear Kathy we would have to do an encoded silent body discourse with<br />
each o<strong>the</strong>r on <strong>the</strong> subject, do our worst work, and never reference it<br />
again. You are losing your touch <strong>the</strong>re in <strong>the</strong> Midwest. No <strong>of</strong>fense intended<br />
if <strong>the</strong>se comments have set you fuming. By <strong>the</strong> time you receive<br />
this we will have chatted on <strong>the</strong> phone and I can tell you in person, as<br />
it were, my incontrovertible refusal to participate in such shenanigans.<br />
In your letter you ask forgiveness for your most recent attempts<br />
to manipulate me. Darling. If you had read my penultimate letter you<br />
would recall that this is not <strong>the</strong> way in which you should talk to me.<br />
You will recall my whole forgiveness/forgetting riff. (In this context,<br />
one might say, for instance, “Forget Kathy.”) If you wish to engage me<br />
in this sort <strong>of</strong> discourse you would do better to give me reasons to<br />
forget what you had said. But don’t do me <strong>the</strong> incivility <strong>of</strong> begging my<br />
forgiveness. To forgive is always uncivil. The assumptions <strong>of</strong> forgiveness<br />
involve all sorts <strong>of</strong> inequalities and presumed states <strong>of</strong> grace, or lack<br />
<strong>the</strong>re<strong>of</strong>, which seem a little out <strong>of</strong> place from our <strong>the</strong>ological perspectives.<br />
I mean, darling, do you suppose that an a<strong>the</strong>ist can forgive ano<strong>the</strong>r?<br />
How exactly would that make sense? No, dear heart, what we<br />
must do as a fast and true friend is forget <strong>the</strong> injustices we have<br />
inflicted on each o<strong>the</strong>r. I can say no more on this subject. But on o<strong>the</strong>r<br />
subjects I can converse at length, as you know all too well. And I am<br />
holding you to your vow <strong>of</strong> silence by refusing to comment fur<strong>the</strong>r.