22.12.2012 Views

(the) American (Novel of)

(the) American (Novel of)

(the) American (Novel of)

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

88 Alison Leigh Brown<br />

my students to get tenure-track jobs. This is what I do when I am not<br />

writing on my current paper. (Swee<strong>the</strong>art, you would die to read it but<br />

it is two drafts away from that. It is a comment on <strong>the</strong> bitchiness<br />

underlying <strong>the</strong> civility in Austen’s middle-period novels. I am having<br />

ever so much fun with it and think it will be a perfect conference paper<br />

for <strong>the</strong> Literature and Civility conference—I’ve covered both bases,<br />

don’t you think? Then I can send it out, where I don’t know. Finally,<br />

it will be a good chapter for <strong>the</strong> book I’m working on too. So three<br />

birds with one stone, eh?)<br />

In any case, <strong>of</strong> course I will not help in sabotaging Kathy’s career.<br />

You are not mistaken in your assessment <strong>of</strong> her; she is an insipid,<br />

humorless little thing, but so what? The academy needs such creatures<br />

to function. Who else would do all that committee work? So enough<br />

<strong>of</strong> your petty meanness. Really darling you must move down here<br />

where manners abound. I fear that I do not believe in <strong>American</strong> culture.<br />

We are worlds apart from south to north. If we were to sabotage<br />

dear Kathy we would have to do an encoded silent body discourse with<br />

each o<strong>the</strong>r on <strong>the</strong> subject, do our worst work, and never reference it<br />

again. You are losing your touch <strong>the</strong>re in <strong>the</strong> Midwest. No <strong>of</strong>fense intended<br />

if <strong>the</strong>se comments have set you fuming. By <strong>the</strong> time you receive<br />

this we will have chatted on <strong>the</strong> phone and I can tell you in person, as<br />

it were, my incontrovertible refusal to participate in such shenanigans.<br />

In your letter you ask forgiveness for your most recent attempts<br />

to manipulate me. Darling. If you had read my penultimate letter you<br />

would recall that this is not <strong>the</strong> way in which you should talk to me.<br />

You will recall my whole forgiveness/forgetting riff. (In this context,<br />

one might say, for instance, “Forget Kathy.”) If you wish to engage me<br />

in this sort <strong>of</strong> discourse you would do better to give me reasons to<br />

forget what you had said. But don’t do me <strong>the</strong> incivility <strong>of</strong> begging my<br />

forgiveness. To forgive is always uncivil. The assumptions <strong>of</strong> forgiveness<br />

involve all sorts <strong>of</strong> inequalities and presumed states <strong>of</strong> grace, or lack<br />

<strong>the</strong>re<strong>of</strong>, which seem a little out <strong>of</strong> place from our <strong>the</strong>ological perspectives.<br />

I mean, darling, do you suppose that an a<strong>the</strong>ist can forgive ano<strong>the</strong>r?<br />

How exactly would that make sense? No, dear heart, what we<br />

must do as a fast and true friend is forget <strong>the</strong> injustices we have<br />

inflicted on each o<strong>the</strong>r. I can say no more on this subject. But on o<strong>the</strong>r<br />

subjects I can converse at length, as you know all too well. And I am<br />

holding you to your vow <strong>of</strong> silence by refusing to comment fur<strong>the</strong>r.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!