22.12.2012 Views

(the) American (Novel of)

(the) American (Novel of)

(the) American (Novel of)

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

62 Trent H. Hamann<br />

behavioral guidelines as a set <strong>of</strong> tactical rules used to enact, embody, and<br />

reproduce some <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> sexist gender norms that have been strategic for<br />

institutionalized heterosexuality in postwar America. The absence <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

need for an explicit rationale here has two primary functions. First, it<br />

operates as a mask for <strong>the</strong> hidden connections between what is prescribed<br />

and <strong>the</strong> unmarked social strategies that depend on <strong>the</strong> active<br />

participation <strong>of</strong> those subjects conditioned by <strong>the</strong>m. In light <strong>of</strong> this<br />

function we see that it is absolutely crucial for etiquette to appear<br />

autonomous and arbitrary if not trivial. Second, it produces <strong>the</strong> effect<br />

<strong>of</strong> causing <strong>the</strong> actions <strong>of</strong> those who do refuse <strong>the</strong> prescriptions <strong>of</strong><br />

etiquette to appear arbitrary and unfounded. Such individuals necessarily<br />

come across as merely willful, petty, immature, stricken with bad<br />

taste—anything but resistant to <strong>the</strong> strategic forces that <strong>of</strong>ten covertly<br />

determine how we fashion ourselves as subjects. 6 To even consider<br />

questioning contemporary etiquette is already to risk disappropriating<br />

oneself from <strong>the</strong> coherent domain <strong>of</strong> propriety, <strong>the</strong>reby rendering<br />

oneself as ei<strong>the</strong>r inappropriate, incoherent, or some combination <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> two.<br />

The Différend: Manners in Dispute<br />

It is always possible one could speak <strong>the</strong> truth in a void; one would only be<br />

in <strong>the</strong> true, however, if one obeyed <strong>the</strong> rules <strong>of</strong> some discursive “policy”<br />

which would have to be reactivated every time one spoke.<br />

—Michel Foucault, “The Discourse on Language”<br />

In his letters to his son, wherein he coined <strong>the</strong> word “etiquette,”<br />

Lord Chesterfield emphasized again and again <strong>the</strong> fact that <strong>the</strong> actual<br />

substance <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> behaviors <strong>of</strong> genteel company matters not at all if one’s<br />

sole purpose is simply to belong to that company. What is important<br />

is that one manage to appropriate <strong>the</strong> form and formality <strong>of</strong> those<br />

behaviors, no matter what <strong>the</strong>y are:<br />

Take <strong>the</strong> tone <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> company that you are in, and do not pretend<br />

to give it; be serious, gay, or even trifling, as you find <strong>the</strong> present<br />

humour <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> company; this is an attention due from every individual<br />

to <strong>the</strong> majority.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!