Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
138 Hildegard Hoeller<br />
some vexations, or at least terrible temptations, <strong>the</strong> author herself feels<br />
in her role as novelist. And she, as <strong>the</strong> writer, speaks <strong>the</strong> truth even as<br />
manners forbid it—never quite openly, more by exposing transgressions<br />
<strong>of</strong> taste. But <strong>the</strong> novel holds its course as a novel <strong>of</strong> manners via<br />
Knightley, <strong>the</strong> one flawless character; highest on <strong>the</strong> social ladder, he<br />
exhibits <strong>the</strong> most unerring sense <strong>of</strong> judgment and manners, navigating<br />
his life among less worthy and well-mannered people with perfect taste<br />
and respect, a paternal caring. He in o<strong>the</strong>r words exhibits manners in<br />
<strong>the</strong> perfect sense. And he instructs Emma, “[Miss Bates] is poor; she has<br />
sunk from <strong>the</strong> comforts she was born to, and if she lives to old age,<br />
must probably sink more. Her situation should secure your compassion.”<br />
8 While Austen thus acknowledges <strong>the</strong> tremendous discipline<br />
manners demand, even at times <strong>the</strong> denial <strong>of</strong> one’s true thoughts, feelings,<br />
and wit for <strong>the</strong> sake <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> cohesion <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> social body, her take<br />
on manners is nei<strong>the</strong>r neurotic nor vexed. Knightley reprimands Emma<br />
and <strong>the</strong> novel agrees, even as Emma also speaks for Austen’s ironic side.<br />
For Austen, manners are <strong>the</strong> foundations <strong>of</strong> her writing, her moral and<br />
social vision. The novel <strong>of</strong> manners is as perfect a form for Austen’s<br />
vision, allowing and containing it, as Knightley is <strong>the</strong> perfect companion<br />
for Emma, loving and instructing her: it is a delightful and reasonable,<br />
a tasteful and well-mannered as well as a morally correct marriage<br />
<strong>of</strong> form and content.<br />
Now let’s move almost a hundred years ahead in history and<br />
across <strong>the</strong> Atlantic to revisit <strong>the</strong> issue <strong>the</strong> novel <strong>of</strong> manners in <strong>the</strong> hands<br />
<strong>of</strong> an <strong>American</strong> writer. Famously tasteful and mannered and moneyed<br />
herself, a member <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> upper class, Edith Wharton excelled in <strong>the</strong><br />
Austenesque tradition <strong>of</strong> ironic realism and <strong>the</strong> minute depiction <strong>of</strong><br />
manners. Thus, in her writing we can best observe <strong>the</strong> full force <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />
<strong>American</strong> dilemma about manners. Consider Wharton’s masterpiece<br />
The House <strong>of</strong> Mirth (1905) in light <strong>of</strong> Austen’s Emma. Wharton, too,<br />
begins her novel with a tasteful and admirable heroine, who is unmarried<br />
for a little bit too long. And Wharton’s novel, too, allows few<br />
stronger actions than breaches <strong>of</strong> manners. But Wharton’s heroine, unable<br />
to find <strong>the</strong> right match, never gets married, slowly descends in class, and<br />
dies by suicide. Tastefully Wharton mitigates this melodramatic ending<br />
by never quite allowing her heroine to actually commit suicide, but by<br />
showing her not to care enough about life to count her sleeping drops<br />
quite correctly. In many o<strong>the</strong>r instances in <strong>the</strong> novel as well, Wharton