INFORMATION SYSTEMS IN MANAGEMENT V - SGGW

Recommendations

Info

92 Sw = n ∑ x n i= 1 n ∑ i= 1 ⋅ w w SW - the weighted average N - number of criteria X - the value of the criteria W - weight of the criterion n n As a result we get the probability of successful implementation of elearning in the enterprise. The result close to 0 is the lowest probability of success and the result about 100 is very large likelihood of success. To clarify a little closer the range of probability, some calculations for a number of companies have been made. They were qualified in advance to one of three groups: • very high probability of success, • the average probability of success, • low probability of success. 1. Here is a sample calculation for the first group of companies: Enterprise: a world leader in the production of software and operating systems for personal computers. The results of the analysis criteria and calculations: (100% * 7 + 100% * 8 + 100% * 9 + 100% * 5 + 100% * 5 + 100% * 6 + 80 + 6% * 100% * 2 + 100% * 4 + 100% * 6 + 100% * 8 + 100% * 7 + 100% * 7 + 100% * 10 + 100% * 7 + 100% * 7 + 100% * 8) / 112 = 98% Very high probability of success. 2. Sample calculations for the second group of companies: Company: mid-size company providing specialized services in Poland and abroad. The results of the analysis criteria and calculations:
(40% * 7 + 10% * 8 + 10% * 9 + 100% * 5 + 100% * 5 + 100 + 6% * 100% * 100 + 6% * 2 + 100% * 4 + 10% * 6 + 10% * 8 + 10% * 7 + 100% * 7 + 100% * 10 + 100% * 7 + 10% * 7 + 100% * 8) / 112 = 60% The average probability of success. 3. Sample calculations for a third of the group: Enterprise: the size of a small production company - working on the commercial market. The results of the analysis criteria and calculations: (10% * 7 + 10% * 8 + 10 + 9% * 10% * 5 + 40% * 5 + 100 + 6% * 100% * 100 + 6% * 2 + 10% * 4 + 10% * 6 + 10% * 8 + 10% * 7 + 100% * 7 + 10 + 10% * 10% * 7 + 10% * 7 + 10% * 8) / 112 = 28% Fairly low probability of success. On the basis of these and similar calculations the following ranges were set: • 0 - 20% - unfavorable conditions for the implementation of e-learning (most likely a very small usefulness) • 20% - 50% - quite favorable conditions for implementation of e-learning (possible introduction of e-learning in a limited way - to meet the very specific needs of the company) • 50% - 80% - favorable conditions for implementation of e-learning (a fairly high probability of success of implementation, however, must be preceded by careful analysis) • 80% - 100% - very favorable conditions for implementation of e-learning (the company is prepared technically, mentally and organizationally for the introduction of this technology) 5. CONCLUSION Please note that the proposed model is quite general and simplified. It can be used to develop a much more detailed and accurate analysis tool for each company. However, the primary goal of this analysis is to make the initial diagnosis -if we look forward or reject the undertaking as it might be too risky. Important part of collected material is emerged picture of company ready to implement an e-learning and a set of its certain features. A new tool has been developed which allows analysis of individual cases and also know an environment in the whole industries. 93
Page 1 and 2:
WARSAW UNIVERSITY OF LIFE SCIENCES
Page 3 and 4:
PREFACE Applications of information
Page 5:
TABLE OF CONTENTS BOLEK M., KARWOWS
Page 8 and 9:
O - Overtime - lack of systematic m
Page 10 and 11:
tion of work, establishing a new br
Page 12 and 13:
12 � finding a balance point for
Page 14 and 15:
2-6-III-09 - Testing and signed Sof
Page 16 and 17:
16 Project launch: 16-III-09, Deadl
Page 18 and 19:
different methods of management. In
Page 20 and 21:
all phases of the enterprise, while
Page 22 and 23:
phase. Additionally, the specificat
Page 24 and 25:
the enterprise level: knowledge is
Page 26 and 27:
INTEGRATED MANAGEMENT SYSTEM FOR UN
Page 28 and 29:
� system should enhance the avail
Page 30 and 31:
additional application Ksantypa ded
Page 32 and 33:
strengths. The main advantage is th
Page 34 and 35:
and Materials Management (MMI), Pay
Page 36 and 37:
36 A SYSTEM FOR COMPUTER AIDDED INT
Page 38 and 39:
38 Figure 2. An IBS tool for farms:
Page 40 and 41:
7. STARTING POINT Every journey sta
Page 42 and 43: 10. AgroXML(2009): www.agroxml.de,
Page 44 and 45: Curry and Moore define information
Page 46 and 47: 46 � applying and implementing e-
Page 48 and 49: izational entities of the financial
Page 50 and 51: 50 PROCESS MONITORING IN IT SYSTEMS
Page 52 and 53: should use scientific methods, whic
Page 54 and 55: Processes map in the first stage of
Page 56 and 57: nisms: tolerance, range, position r
Page 58 and 59: updating in permanent intervals of
Page 60 and 61: developments in the information and
Page 62 and 63: y inputting real world decisions an
Page 64 and 65: REFERENCES 1. Barteczko K., Bocian
Page 66 and 67: � quality (means its completeness
Page 68 and 69: interrelationships could be extorte
Page 70 and 71: 3. THE INFLUENCE OF INFORMATION TEC
Page 72 and 73: outside and inside a company. Other
Page 74 and 75: � creating condition to continuou
Page 76 and 77: cerning the steering theory and sys
Page 78 and 79: are missing, such IT systems as PES
Page 80 and 81: 80 y2 - state budget expenditure in
Page 82 and 83: and next we can obtain knowledge ab
Page 84 and 85: 84 and matrix C and D: C = [ 1] and
Page 86 and 87: 86 THE IMPLEMENTATION OF E-LEARNING
Page 88 and 89: - The criterion for advancement of
Page 90 and 91: What is the percentage of jobs prov
Page 94: REFERENCES 1. Edvinson L.,Malone M.
show all

INFORMATION SYSTEMS IN MANAGEMENT V - SGGW

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?