26.12.2012 Views

Tech Hardware Supply Chain - Gazhoo

Tech Hardware Supply Chain - Gazhoo

Tech Hardware Supply Chain - Gazhoo

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Bhavin Shah<br />

(852) 2800-8538<br />

bhavin.a.shah@jpmorgan.com<br />

The gap between fabless and<br />

foundry revenue Q/Q growth<br />

tends to converge to zero<br />

Our analysis suggests that<br />

either foundry orders will drop in<br />

3Q09, or the fabless revenue will<br />

have to be revised upward<br />

332<br />

Asia Pacific Equity Research<br />

20 April 2009<br />

The gap between fabless and foundry revenue Q/Q growth<br />

converges to zero over time<br />

Over time, we expect the gap between fabless and foundry revenue Q/Q growth to<br />

converge to near zero as: a) fabless houses are major clients of foundries,<br />

contributing around 70% of the total foundry revenue; and b) the gap created in each<br />

quarter due to inventory buildup/burn-down should be offset over time because of the<br />

consistency.<br />

Having reached near zero back in 3Q05, based on current 2Q09E estimate of around<br />

100% Q/Q revenue growth for foundry and 8% Q/Q for fabless, the cumulative<br />

difference of the gap should do a complete flip-flop—from a record high of +50% in<br />

1Q09 to -45% (i.e., higher foundry growth versus fabless growth) in 2Q09. Hence,<br />

the market must adjust itself to narrow the gap and imply one key message: Either<br />

foundry orders will drop in 3Q09, or the fabless revenue will have to be revised<br />

upward, in our analysis. We do believe that through the earnings season, fabless<br />

revenue growth estimates will be revised upwards, but the gap should remain fairly<br />

large—at least -15% to -20%. Although we assume fabless revenues would grow 9%<br />

in 3Q09 and 8% in 4Q09 and that foundry revenues will decline 11% in 3Q09 and<br />

3% in 4Q09, the gap should not get back to zero by end-2009, in our view.<br />

Table 175: Cumulative gap of fabless vs. foundry revenue Q/Q since the last near-zero quarter<br />

3Q05 4Q05 1Q06 2Q06 3Q06 4Q06 1Q07 2Q07 3Q07 4Q07 1Q08 2Q08 3Q08 4Q08 1Q09E 2Q09E 3Q09E 4Q09E<br />

Cumulative gap 1% -4% 4% 2% 6% 14% 24% 21% 12% 11% 12% 8% 17% 24% 50% -45% -24% -14%<br />

Source: Companies, Bloomberg, and J.P. Morgan estimates.<br />

A similar case could also be observed in historical data: In 2Q02, foundry revenue<br />

grew 34% Q/Q, whereas fabless revenue declined 2% Q/Q. In the following two<br />

quarters, foundry revenues saw a 4% Q/Q decline despite 8% and 9% Q/Q increases<br />

in fabless revenue. As another example, in 3Q04, fabless inventory days peaked with<br />

the cumulative gap reaching a record low of -12%. It ended up that foundry revenue<br />

then met with sequential drops of 8% and 14% in the next two quarters (Figure 211).<br />

Given continued lack of confidence on global end-demand improvement, we believe<br />

a correction in foundry is a more likely scenario. We expect most of the market<br />

adjustments to happen in 3Q09.<br />

Figure 211: The cumulative gap between fabless and foundry revenue, Q/Q<br />

-<br />

40<br />

30<br />

20<br />

10<br />

(10)<br />

(20)<br />

Day<br />

1Q98<br />

2Q98<br />

3Q98<br />

4Q98<br />

1Q99<br />

2Q99<br />

3Q99<br />

4Q99<br />

1Q00<br />

2Q00<br />

3Q00<br />

4Q00<br />

1Q01<br />

2Q01<br />

3Q01<br />

4Q01<br />

1Q02<br />

2Q02<br />

3Q02<br />

4Q02<br />

1Q03<br />

2Q03<br />

3Q03<br />

4Q03<br />

1Q04<br />

2Q04<br />

3Q04<br />

4Q04<br />

1Q05<br />

2Q05<br />

3Q05<br />

4Q05<br />

1Q06<br />

2Q06<br />

3Q06<br />

4Q06<br />

1Q07<br />

2Q07<br />

3Q07<br />

4Q07<br />

1Q08<br />

2Q08<br />

3Q08<br />

4Q08<br />

1Q09<br />

2Q09<br />

3Q09<br />

4Q09<br />

Fabless DOI - abov e/below av erage of 65 day s Foundry rev QoQ (RHS)<br />

Fabless rev QoQ (RHS) Cumulativ e gap (RHS)<br />

Source: Bloomberg, companies, J.P. Morgan estimates.<br />

150%<br />

100%<br />

50%<br />

0%<br />

-50%<br />

-100%

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!