26.12.2012 Views

Tech Hardware Supply Chain - Gazhoo

Tech Hardware Supply Chain - Gazhoo

Tech Hardware Supply Chain - Gazhoo

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Bhavin Shah<br />

(852) 2800-8538<br />

bhavin.a.shah@jpmorgan.com<br />

68<br />

Asia Pacific Equity Research<br />

20 April 2009<br />

• Cons: Slow speed; supports fewer simultaneous users; appliances may interfere<br />

on the unregulated frequency band.<br />

802.11g<br />

802.11g attempts to combine the best of both 802.11a and 802.11b by supporting<br />

bandwidth up to 54 Mbps, and using the 2.4 GHz frequency for greater range.<br />

802.11g is backwards compatible with 802.11b, meaning that 802.11g access points<br />

will work with 802.11b wireless network adapters and vice versa.<br />

• Pros: Fast at maximum speed, supports more simultaneous users and signal range<br />

is the best and is not easily obstructed.<br />

• Cons: Appliances may interfere on the unregulated frequency.<br />

Wireless network adapters cost approximately the same for 802.11b and 802.11g.<br />

Dual-band adapters that work for 802.11 a/b/g are also available but at an<br />

appreciably higher cost.<br />

802.11n<br />

In January 2004, IEEE formed a new 802.11 Task Group to develop a new<br />

amendment to the 802.11 standard for local-area wireless networks. The real data<br />

throughput will be at least 100 Mbps and should be up to four to five times faster<br />

than 802.11a or 802.11g, and perhaps 20 times faster than 802.11b. It is projected<br />

that 802.11n will also offer a better operating distance than current networks.<br />

802.11n builds upon previous 802.11 standards by adding MIMO (multiple-input<br />

multiple-output). The additional transmitter and receiver antennas allow for increased<br />

data throughput through spatial multiplexing and increased range by exploiting the<br />

spatial diversity.<br />

There were two competing variants of the 802.11n standard: WWiSE (backed by<br />

companies including Broadcom, HP, Motorola, Nokia and TI) and TGn Sync<br />

(backed by Intel and Philips). In May 2005, TGn Sync, WWiSE and MITMOT (a<br />

third group promoted by Mitsubishi and Motorola, whose proposal had been rejected<br />

by IEEE in January 2005) merged to form a Joint Proposal Group. In September<br />

2005, the group presented two status reports regarding progress toward developing a<br />

merged proposal. In Jan 2009, the 7th draft of the standard was re-approved;<br />

however, the standard still is not finalized.<br />

Despite the standard not being finalized, we are seeing some products on the draft<br />

versions being sold in the market already. Apple Computers announced the release of<br />

its 802.11n products, Apple TV and Apple’s new AirPort Extreme base station in<br />

early 2007. Computers shipped to date with Intel Core 2 Duo chips could also be<br />

upgraded to support the new wireless standard through a firmware patch and an<br />

updated base station.<br />

802.11s (wireless mesh networks)<br />

Mesh networking is a way of routing of data, voice and instructions between nodes<br />

(devices that are part of a computer network). These mesh networks reduce the need<br />

for wired connections in wireless LANs by letting multiple access points carry each<br />

others’ traffic. A conventional WLAN access point needs its own wired link to a<br />

backbone network, whereas a wireless mesh can have just one wire for many access<br />

points. Traffic destined for the internet can hop from one access point to another until<br />

it reaches the wired connection. A newly added access point can be automatically

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!