05.01.2013 Views

Helmet-Mounted Displays: - USAARL - The - U.S. Army

Helmet-Mounted Displays: - USAARL - The - U.S. Army

Helmet-Mounted Displays: - USAARL - The - U.S. Army

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

202<br />

B. Joseph McEntire<br />

impacting surface and the ability of the outer shell to distribute the load.<br />

<strong>The</strong> <strong>Army</strong> aviation community has eliminated the hemispherical impact<br />

anvil from the performance requirement and selected the flat anvil only.<br />

This decision was based on the fact that in the <strong>Army</strong> helicopter crash<br />

environment, hemispherical impact surfaces were rarely struck while flat<br />

surfaces were prominent. <strong>The</strong> hemispherical impact anvil presents a point<br />

loading threat to the helmet. To defeat this threat, the helmet shell must be<br />

rigid enough to resist local deformation and distribute the impact load and<br />

the energy liner must possess either an increase thickness or an increase<br />

crush resistance load. Designing a helmet system to defeat the point<br />

loading threat has typically resulted in increased mass.<br />

<strong>The</strong> impact attenuation material used in <strong>Army</strong> aviation helmets has<br />

been predominantly expanded bead polystyrene. This material and molding<br />

process is well known and inexpensive. It also possesses desirable impact<br />

attenuation characteristics, such as good energy attenuation and low<br />

rebound . This material is also predominant in the motorcycle and bicycle<br />

protective helmets. Other impact attenuation materials are available and<br />

should be considered. Polyurethane is one such material. Polyurethane has<br />

been and continues to be used by military aviators in the United Kingdom.<br />

Frangibility<br />

Frangibility of helmet components is required when the total head<br />

supported mass creates an unacceptable risk of neck injury. <strong>The</strong> purpose<br />

of incorporating frangible (automatically detachable) devices into the<br />

helmet assembly is to remove the mass from the helmet, thus reducing the<br />

risk of neck injury. <strong>The</strong> AN/PVS-5 NVG, when used by <strong>Army</strong> aircrew,<br />

were attached to the SPH-4 helmet with “hook and pile” fasteners and<br />

elastic tubing. This method did not allow the goggles to easily or<br />

consistently detach during a crash. During ANVIS development, the<br />

attachment mechanism was designed with a spring loaded “ball and socket”<br />

engagement which allowed the NVG to separate from the mount when<br />

exposed to an 10 to 15 G loading. This mechanism has performed well in<br />

the <strong>Army</strong> helicopter crash environment. <strong>The</strong> IHADSS HDU, which is a<br />

monocular CRT display, is also easily attached and detached from the<br />

helmet mount. <strong>Mounted</strong> on the right lower edge of the helmet shell, the<br />

HDU also detaches from the helmet during crash loadings, and actual crash<br />

experience has shown it to perform well.<br />

Both, the ANVIS and IHADSS HDU detachment mechanisms operate<br />

when the device is exposed to crash loads and its dynamic inertia loads

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!