Helmet-Mounted Displays: - USAARL - The - U.S. Army
Helmet-Mounted Displays: - USAARL - The - U.S. Army
Helmet-Mounted Displays: - USAARL - The - U.S. Army
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
48<br />
Clarence E. Rash, Melissa H. Ledford, and John C. Mora<br />
sky (0.00001 fL) to that of a sunlit white cloud (10,000 fL). <strong>The</strong> image<br />
source must have high enough luminance to provide (after losses through<br />
the optics which can be as high as 80%) sufficient contrast (SOGs) to allow<br />
adequate vision for successful completion of all mission tasks. Current<br />
commercially available miniature FP image sources are limited to<br />
luminances of only slightly better than 200 fL.<br />
<strong>The</strong>re are two leading candidate FP technologies for the miniature<br />
image sources needed for <strong>Army</strong> aviation: AMEL and AMLCD. As with all<br />
FP displays, these two display types do not have a mature and reliable<br />
manufacturing history, do not provide for sufficient symbology luminance,<br />
and have limited distortion correction schemes (Belt et al., 1997). AMELs<br />
additionally suffer from insufficient video luminance; AMLCDs ( because<br />
of their low structure transmission) require extremely high backlight<br />
luminances and have limited temporal response for presenting the dynamic<br />
imagery required for the military rotary-wing environment.<br />
A FP technology display which has recently gained considerable<br />
attention because it offers CRT-like characteristics in a thin, flat package<br />
is the FED (Jones and Jones, 1995). FEDs are considered by some HMD<br />
designers to be the best of both worlds and a hands-down choice for future<br />
aviation applications. <strong>The</strong>ir potential performance advantages include very<br />
low power requirements, wide viewing angle, excellent resolution, and<br />
high contrast (>100:1); and they can withstand the harsh aviation<br />
environment, including temperature and vibration requirements. However,<br />
FED displays have yet to meet their full potential, still attempting to<br />
overcome problems with high density patterning, switching voltages,<br />
luminance uniformity, driver electronics, production, reliability, and others<br />
(Jones et al., 1996; Giri, 1995.). While considered as the most promising<br />
display technology for advanced cockpit applications (Marticello and<br />
Hopper, 1996), for now, FEDs will have to settle for being the “holy grail”<br />
of image sources.<br />
An excellent bibliography for the technical characteristics of currently<br />
available miniature FP image sources is provided by Ferrin (1997). <strong>The</strong> FP<br />
manufacturing community is actively seeking to expand the performance<br />
of current displays. Through these efforts, these displays are slowly<br />
overcoming the limitations briefly described here. It is imperative that<br />
HMD developers maintain awareness of such improvements. <strong>The</strong> authors<br />
have found the two major sources of information on FP development and<br />
HMD design to be the annual conferences held by the Society of<br />
Information Display (SID), Santa Ana, California, and by the Society of<br />
Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE), Bellingham, Washington.