05.01.2013 Views

Helmet-Mounted Displays: - USAARL - The - U.S. Army

Helmet-Mounted Displays: - USAARL - The - U.S. Army

Helmet-Mounted Displays: - USAARL - The - U.S. Army

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Optical Designs 71<br />

Figure 3.4. Comparisons between refractive and catadioptric HMDs with<br />

and without prism combiners.<br />

distortions and aberrations increase rapidly (Buchroeder, 1987). An<br />

example of a modest off-axis catadioptric design with a plano combiner is<br />

shown in Figure 3.5 (Droessler and Rotier, 1989; Rotier, 1989). This<br />

catadioptric design achieves a 50º x 60º FOV with a 10-exit pupil and 30mm<br />

eye relief (measured from plano combiner intercept to apex of eye<br />

along primary line of sight). However, note the optical complexity with 11<br />

refractive elements and 3 reflective surfaces with very complex coatings for<br />

both eyepiece reflective surfaces to maximize see-through and display<br />

transmissions. <strong>The</strong> modest trapezoidal distortion of 7.5% (Figure 3.6) will<br />

be aligned with the power combiner. Another promising HMD is the<br />

Monolithic Afocal Relay Combiner (MONARC), which is an off-axis,<br />

rotationally symmetrical lens system with modest FOV potential, but<br />

excellent see-through approach (Figure 3.7). However, for any of the offaxis<br />

binocular systems, the distortions will have to be corrected to achieve<br />

point for point image alignment throughout the FOV.<br />

<strong>The</strong> primary advantage of the off-axis reflective HMD design is that it<br />

provides the highest potential percent luminance transfer from the display<br />

with the most see-through vision and increased eye clearances for a given<br />

FOV. <strong>The</strong> primary disadvantages are very complex optical designs, shape<br />

distortions, and low structural integrity and stability of the reflective<br />

surface. Figure 3.8 shows the conceptual drawings (top and side view) of<br />

an off-axis HMD using the visor as the eyepiece. Note the locations of the<br />

aerial images, which are shown for the left eye. <strong>The</strong> location of the relay<br />

optics will be either on top of the helmet, or below, where both locations<br />

have undesirable characteristics such as a high center of mass, or produce<br />

lower obstructions to unaided vision. Also, note that the head seems to get<br />

in the way with the optics or relay image. Again, there have been<br />

prototypes and a few HUDs, but no production off-axis reflective HMDs.<br />

Where there are no provisions for electronic distortion correction, as found<br />

with NVGs, the off-axis designs become unacceptable from the keystone<br />

or trapezoidal type distortions.<br />

Pupil and nonpupil forming<br />

A nonpupil forming virtual display uses a simple eyepiece to collimate<br />

or focus a real image source. An example is NVG where eyepieces focus<br />

the 18-mm phosphor screens to produce a 40º FOV. <strong>The</strong> display size,

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!