Helmet-Mounted Displays: - USAARL - The - U.S. Army
Helmet-Mounted Displays: - USAARL - The - U.S. Army
Helmet-Mounted Displays: - USAARL - The - U.S. Army
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
236<br />
Joseph R. Licina<br />
operational use or maintenance. In view of the <strong>Army</strong>’s current reduction<br />
of manpower assets, it behooves an HMD developer to minimize such<br />
restricting requirements. And, as the <strong>Army</strong> has a philosophy of not<br />
excluding personnel from specific assignments due to anthropometric<br />
considerations. <strong>The</strong>refore, the HMD helmet dimensions must not exclude<br />
any significant portion of the aviator population. Anyone involved in the<br />
evolution of HMD systems in the past have found fitting to be a very soft<br />
skill that is perishable if not repeated on a semi-routine basis. Knowledge<br />
of head and face anthropometry must be gained before proper articulated<br />
fitting can be accomplished. Fitting requirements, to include specialized<br />
skills and equipment, must be minimized as the <strong>Army</strong> has resisted the<br />
establishment of a full time military occupational specialty for aviation life<br />
support equipment (ALSE) personnel. Under the existing system of an<br />
additional skill identifier, ALSE personnel routinely only spend one<br />
assignment in ALSE, then return to their primary military occupational<br />
specialty to maintain currency for advancement in the rank. This severely<br />
affects fitting skill quality and, invariably, the quality of provided fits.<br />
Maintenance<br />
Because advanced HMDs incorporate potentially fragile optical and<br />
electronic components and require that an optical alignment, needed for<br />
viewing and targeting, be maintained, they require increased care in their<br />
day to day handling (Rash and Martin, 1988). <strong>The</strong> field environment in<br />
which they operate, coupled with their constant daily usage, subject them<br />
to normal wear and tear and occasional abuse. <strong>The</strong> normal field operational<br />
environment experienced by <strong>Army</strong> aviators may be much harsher than that<br />
of any of the other military services. Keep in mind that all Air Force and<br />
Navy/Marine assets operated from fixed sites or airfields during our last<br />
conflicts. <strong>The</strong> U.S. <strong>Army</strong> aviation units were forward deployed out of<br />
desert sites with no fixed base support to allow for general environmental<br />
protection of equipment. Today, in the Bosnian operation, <strong>Army</strong> aviation<br />
assets do not enjoy the same fixed base facilities of the sister services. In<br />
order to be acceptable to the military aviation community, HMDs must be<br />
able to perform their intended functions without being degraded by normal<br />
usage. When failure does occur, repairs need to be accomplished at the<br />
lowest maintenance level possible. Where feasible, modular replacement<br />
as a maintenance approach is critical.<br />
A formal field maintenance program is essential for the fielding of<br />
sophisticated HMDs. Developers must identify critical components and