05.01.2013 Views

Helmet-Mounted Displays: - USAARL - The - U.S. Army

Helmet-Mounted Displays: - USAARL - The - U.S. Army

Helmet-Mounted Displays: - USAARL - The - U.S. Army

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

236<br />

Joseph R. Licina<br />

operational use or maintenance. In view of the <strong>Army</strong>’s current reduction<br />

of manpower assets, it behooves an HMD developer to minimize such<br />

restricting requirements. And, as the <strong>Army</strong> has a philosophy of not<br />

excluding personnel from specific assignments due to anthropometric<br />

considerations. <strong>The</strong>refore, the HMD helmet dimensions must not exclude<br />

any significant portion of the aviator population. Anyone involved in the<br />

evolution of HMD systems in the past have found fitting to be a very soft<br />

skill that is perishable if not repeated on a semi-routine basis. Knowledge<br />

of head and face anthropometry must be gained before proper articulated<br />

fitting can be accomplished. Fitting requirements, to include specialized<br />

skills and equipment, must be minimized as the <strong>Army</strong> has resisted the<br />

establishment of a full time military occupational specialty for aviation life<br />

support equipment (ALSE) personnel. Under the existing system of an<br />

additional skill identifier, ALSE personnel routinely only spend one<br />

assignment in ALSE, then return to their primary military occupational<br />

specialty to maintain currency for advancement in the rank. This severely<br />

affects fitting skill quality and, invariably, the quality of provided fits.<br />

Maintenance<br />

Because advanced HMDs incorporate potentially fragile optical and<br />

electronic components and require that an optical alignment, needed for<br />

viewing and targeting, be maintained, they require increased care in their<br />

day to day handling (Rash and Martin, 1988). <strong>The</strong> field environment in<br />

which they operate, coupled with their constant daily usage, subject them<br />

to normal wear and tear and occasional abuse. <strong>The</strong> normal field operational<br />

environment experienced by <strong>Army</strong> aviators may be much harsher than that<br />

of any of the other military services. Keep in mind that all Air Force and<br />

Navy/Marine assets operated from fixed sites or airfields during our last<br />

conflicts. <strong>The</strong> U.S. <strong>Army</strong> aviation units were forward deployed out of<br />

desert sites with no fixed base support to allow for general environmental<br />

protection of equipment. Today, in the Bosnian operation, <strong>Army</strong> aviation<br />

assets do not enjoy the same fixed base facilities of the sister services. In<br />

order to be acceptable to the military aviation community, HMDs must be<br />

able to perform their intended functions without being degraded by normal<br />

usage. When failure does occur, repairs need to be accomplished at the<br />

lowest maintenance level possible. Where feasible, modular replacement<br />

as a maintenance approach is critical.<br />

A formal field maintenance program is essential for the fielding of<br />

sophisticated HMDs. Developers must identify critical components and

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!