05.01.2013 Views

Helmet-Mounted Displays: - USAARL - The - U.S. Army

Helmet-Mounted Displays: - USAARL - The - U.S. Army

Helmet-Mounted Displays: - USAARL - The - U.S. Army

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Introductory Overview 13<br />

1970's. Task and Kocian (1995) cite the U.S. Navy’s Visual Target<br />

Acquisition System (VTAS), developed in the 1960's, as the first fully<br />

operational visually coupled sighting system. [However, the system was<br />

abandoned due to lack of sufficient missile fire control technology.] For<br />

<strong>Army</strong> aviation, the AN/PVS-5 NVG was the first pilotage imagery HMD<br />

(first tested in 1973), and the IHADSS was the first integrated HMD<br />

(fielded since 1985).<br />

Simply, an HMD projects head-directed sensor imagery and/or fire<br />

control symbology onto the eye, usually superimposed over a see-through<br />

view of the outside world. As such, HMDs offer the potential for enhanced<br />

situation awareness and effectiveness. However, their design and<br />

implementation are not without problems and limitations. Virtually every<br />

HMD, concept or fielded system, suffers from one or more deficiencies,<br />

such as high head-supported weight, center of mass (CM) off-sets,<br />

inadequate exit pupil, limited FOV, low brightness, low contrast, limited<br />

resolution, fitting problems, and low user acceptance (Cameron, 1997;<br />

Naor, Arnon, and Avnur, 1987). Of the potential problems with HMDs,<br />

none are more troublesome than those associated with the interfacing of the<br />

system with the human user. <strong>The</strong> wide variation in head and facial<br />

anthropometry makes this a formidable task, requiring HMD designs rich<br />

in flexibility and user adjustments.<br />

An HMD designer must develop a system which is capable of<br />

satisfying a large number of widely different and often conflicting<br />

requirements in a single system. Such design goals include but are not<br />

limited to the following (Lewis, 1979):<br />

� Maximum impact protection<br />

� Maximum acoustical protection<br />

� Maximum speech intelligibility<br />

� Minimum head supported weight<br />

� Minimum bulk<br />

� Minimum CM offset<br />

� Optimum head aiming/tracking accuracy<br />

� Maximum comfort and user acceptance<br />

� Maximum freedom of movement<br />

� Wide FOV<br />

� Minimum obstructions in visual field<br />

� Full color imagery<br />

� Maximum resolution<br />

� High brightness and contrast<br />

� No induced sensory illusions

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!