Helmet-Mounted Displays: - USAARL - The - U.S. Army

266
Clarence E. Rash, John C. Mora, and Melissa H. Ledford
only way to ensure optimal HMD performance when it is counts - on the
battlefield.
References
Anstey, G., and Dore, M. J. 1980. Automatic measurement of cathode ray
tube MTFs. Royal Signals and Radar Establishment.
Quast, T., and Marticello, D. N. 1996. Flat panel display test and
evaluation for U.S. military applications. Cockpit Displays III,
Proceedings of SPIE, Vol. 2734, pp. 305-310.
Rash, C. E., Mozo, B. T., McLean, W. E., McEntire, B. J., Haley, J. L.,
Licina, J. R., and Richardson, L. W. 1996. Assessment methodology
for integrated helmet and display systems in rotary-wing aircraft. Fort
Rucker, AL: U.S. Army Aeromedical Research Laboratory. USAARL
Report No. 96-1.
Task, L. T. 1979. An evaluation and comparison of several measures of
image quality for television displays. Wright-Patterson AFB, OH:
Aerospace Medical Research Laboratory. AMRL-TR-79-7.
Task, H. L., and Verona, R. W. 1976. A new measure of television display
image quality relatable to observer performance. Wright-Patterson
AFB, OH: Aerospace Medical Research Laboratory. AMRL-TR-76-
73.
Verona, R. W. 1992. Comparison of CRT display measurement
techniques. Helmet Mounted Displays III, Proceedings of SPIE, Vol.
1695, pp. 117-127.
Verona, R. W., Task, H. L., Arnold, V. C., and Brindle, J. H. 1979. A
direct measure of CRT image quality. Fort Rucker, AL: U.S. Army
Aeromedical Research Laboratory. USAARL Report No. 79-14.