COST Action E 52 - vTI - Bund.de

More documents

Recommendations

Info

eFereNces Chmura D. J., Roźkowski R. 2002. Variability of beech provenances in spring and autumn phenology. Silvae Genetica, 51/2-3: 123-12 . Comps B., Thiebaut B., Šugar I., Trinajstić I., Plazibat M. 1991. Genetic variation of the Croatian beech stands (Fagus sylvatica L.): spatial differentiation in connection with the environment. Ann. Sci. For., 48: 15-28. Glavaš M., Harapin M., Hrašovec B. 1992. Zaštita šuma. [Forest Protection.] In: Rauš Đ. (ed.): Šume u Hrvatskoj. Zagreb, Šumarski fakultet: 1 1-1 9. Gömöry D., Hynek V., Paule L. 1998. Delineation of seed zones for European beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) in the Czech Republic based on isozyme gene markers. Ann. Sci. For., 55: 425-436. Gračan J., Ivanković M. 2001. Prvi rezultati uspijevanja provenijencija obične bukve (Fagus sylvatica L.) u Hrvatskoj. [First resuts on growth of beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) provenances in Croatia.] In: Matić S., Krpan A. P. B., Gračan J. (eds.): Znanost u potrajnom gospodarenju hrvatskim šumama. Zagreb, Šumarski fakultet i Šumarski institut: 1 5-190. Gračan J., Krstinić A., Matić S., Rauš Đ., Seletković Z. 1995. Šumski sjemenski rajoni (jedinice) u Hrvatskoj. [Forest seed zones in Croatia.] Jastrebarsko, Šumarski institut, (unpublished manuscript). Gračan J., Turok J., Kremer A., Paule L., Bonfils P., Lipman 1999. Beech and oak genetic resources in Croatia. In: Proceedings of the second EUFORGEN Social Broadleaves meeting. European Forest Genetic Resources Programme. Birmensdorf, Switzerland, p. 53-61. Gradečki M., Poštenjak K., Regent B. 1990. Osnivanje rad i razvoj organiziranog šumskog sjemenarstva u Hrvatskoj u razdoblju od 30 godina (1959 – 1989). [Foundation and development of organized forest seed husbandry in Croatia during last 30 years (1959 – 1989).] Šumarski list, 114/6-8: 295-29 . Harapin M. 2003. Harmful factors and integral protection of common beech. In: Matić S. (ed.): Common beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) in Croatia. Zagreb, Academy of Forestry Sciences, Hrvatske šume Ltd., Zagreb City Office for Agriculture and Forestry: 594-598. Ivanković M., Bogdan S., Božič G. 2008. Varijabilnost visinskog rasta obične bukve (Fagus sylvatica L.) u testovima provenijencija u Hrvatskoj i Sloveniji. [European beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) height growth variability in Croatian and Slovenian provenance trials.] Šumarski list, 132/11-12: 529- 541. Jazbec A., Šegotić K., Ivanković M., Marjanović H., Perić S. 200 . Ranking of European beech provenances in Croatia using statistical analysis and analytical hierarchy process. Forestry, 80/2: 151-162. Klepac D. 1986. Uvodni referat na simpoziju o bukvi. [Colocvium on beech. Introductory paper.] In: Krpan A. P. B. (ed.): Kolokvij o bukvi. Zagreb, Šumarski fakultet: 11-15. Matić S., Oršanić M., Anić I.: 2003. Silviculture in beech forests. In: Matić S. (ed.): Common beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) in Croatia. Zagreb, Academy of Forestry Sciences, Hrvatske šume Ltd., Zagreb City Office for Agriculture and Forestry: 326-339 and 3 0-392. Matić S., Skenderović J. 1993. Uzgajanje šuma. [Silviculture.] In: Rauš Đ. (ed.): Zagreb, Šume u Hrvatskoj. Šumarski fakultet i Hrvatske šume: 81-95. 6
Official Gazette NN 140/05, 2005: Zakon o šumskom reprodukcijskom materijalu. [Law on Forest Reproductive Material.] Narodne novine br. 140/05. Paule L. 1995. Gene conservation in European beech (Fagus sylvatica L.). Forest Genetics, 2/3: 161- 1 0. Pernar N., Bakšić D. 2003. The soils of beech forests. In: Matić S. (ed.): Common beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) in Croatia. Zagreb, Academy of Forestry Sciences, Hrvatske šume Ltd., Zagreb City Office for Agriculture and Forestry: 66- 1. Potočić N., Seletković I. 2000. Stanje oštećenosti šuma u Republici Hrvatskoj 1998. [Crown condition of forests in Croatia in 1998.] Šumarski list, 124/1-2: 51-56. Prpić B., Seletković Z., Jurjević P., Tikvić I. 2003. The decline of common beech. In: Matić S. (ed.): Common beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) in Croatia. Zagreb, Academy of Forestry Sciences, Hrvatske šume Ltd., Zagreb City Office for Agriculture and Forestry: 239-244. Seletković Z., Tikvić I. 2003. Climate of forest ecosystems of common beech in Croatia. In: Matić S. (ed.): Common beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) in Croatia. Zagreb, Academy of Forestry Sciences, Hrvatske šume Ltd., Zagreb City Office for Agriculture and Forestry: 83-86. Šafar J. 1958. Osnovna razdioba područja Hrvatske na sjemenske jedinice. [Basic seed units delineation of Croatia.] Šumarski list, 82/10: 329-338. Vukelić J., Baričević D. 2003. Forest communities of common beech in Croatia. In: Matić S. (ed.): Common beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) in Croatia. Zagreb, Academy of Forestry Sciences, Hrvatske šume Ltd., Zagreb City Office for Agriculture and Forestry: 108-123. Vukelić J., Rauš Đ. 1998. Šumarska fitocenologija i šumske zajednice u Hrvatskoj. [Forest Phytocenology and Forest Communities in Croatia.] Zagreb, Sveučilište u Zagrebu, Šumarski fakultet: 310 p. Wuehlisch von G. 200 . Series of international provenance trials of European beech. In: Improvement and Silviculture of Beech, Proceedings from the th International Beech Symposium IUFRO Research Group 1.10.00. Teheran, Iran, Research Institute of Forests and Rangelands (RIFR): 135-144. Reviewed contacts: Dr. sc. Mladen Ivanković, Dr. sc. Sasa Bogdan Croatian Forest Research Institute, Division for Genetics, Tree Breeding and Forest Seed Husbandry Cvjetno naselje 41, 10450 Jastrebarsko, Croatia e-mail: mladeni@sumins.hr, sasa.bogdan@zg.htnet.hr
Page 1 and 2:
Sonderheft 350 Special Issue COST A
Page 3 and 4:
Landbauforschung vTI Agriculture an
Page 5:
COST Action E52 Genetic resources o
Page 8 and 9:
Ernő Führer - Csaba Mátyás - Gy
Page 10 and 11:
Genetic resources of beech in Europ
Page 13 and 14:
The sTaTus oF euroPeaN beech (Fagus
Page 15 and 16:
• Beech (Fagus), 19 ,093 ha; with
Page 17 and 18:
Fig. 3: Mixed forest of European be
Page 19 and 20:
TreaTmeNT oF beech In forest with a
Page 21 and 22:
Tab. 2: E. beech Nature Reserve Int
Page 23 and 24:
Tab. 4: Percentage of defoliation a
Page 25 and 26:
“Qaf Shtame” national park, in
Page 27 and 28: Qiriazi P., Sala S., 2006. Nature M
Page 29 and 30: Armenia is characterized by a mount
Page 31 and 32: Fig. 3: Leaves of oriental beech (h
Page 33 and 34: The Georgian oak forests prefer the
Page 35 and 36: Fig. 5: Map of oriental beech distr
Page 37 and 38: PesTs, dIseases aNd abIoTIc ImPacTs
Page 39 and 40: Khanjyan N. 2004. Specially protect
Page 41 and 42: was reported by Polaczek (1954) who
Page 43 and 44: Fig. 2: Selected target trees in a
Page 45 and 46: Tab. 2: Compilation of different as
Page 47 and 48: Schadauer K., Büchsenmeister R., S
Page 49 and 50: Fig. 1: Provenances regions in Belg
Page 51 and 52: Fig. 3: Regenerated stand by clumps
Page 53 and 54: eFereNces 1 http://environnement.wa
Page 55 and 56: Fig. 1: Distribution of European be
Page 57 and 58: activities already during medieval
Page 59 and 60: established aimed at seed productio
Page 61 and 62: Fig. 4: Sub-Mediterranean type of d
Page 63 and 64: CURRENT STATE OF EUROPEAN BEECH (FA
Page 65 and 66: Fig. 2: Map of natural range of Fag
Page 67 and 68: The health status of beech forests
Page 69 and 70: Under the auspices of the Internati
Page 71 and 72: Velinova K., Naydenova T., Dakov A.
Page 73 and 74: the Adriatic coast, while in the co
Page 75 and 76: Fig. 1: Provenace regions and seed
Page 77: Fig. 2: International beech provena
Page 81 and 82: European beech is distributed almos
Page 83 and 84: According to the Report about fores
Page 85 and 86: The most important ex situ conserva
Page 87 and 88: eFereNces Čermák K., Hofman J., K
Page 89 and 90: Zpráva o stavu lesa a lesního hos
Page 91 and 92: ForesT maNaGemeNT European beech in
Page 93 and 94: euroPeaN beech (Fagus sylvatica L.)
Page 95 and 96: GeNeTIc resources maNaGemeNT IN Fra
Page 97 and 98: Fig. 2: Beech provenance region lim
Page 99 and 100: eFereNces Anonymous 2008. Cours des
Page 101 and 102: of Georgia up to 00 - 800 m a.s.l.
Page 103 and 104: 5,0% 5,0% 6,9% 6,9% 0,6% 0 0,6% 4,7
Page 105 and 106: Georgia 52 associations (forest typ
Page 107 and 108: - Matured and over-aged groups acco
Page 109 and 110: Fig. 5. Scheme of structure at heig
Page 111 and 112: curreNT GeNeTIc coNservaTIoN acTIvI
Page 113 and 114: • Elaborating and implementation
Page 115 and 116: curreNT sTaTe oF euroPeaN beech (Fa
Page 117 and 118: other forest species or grassland.
Page 119 and 120: Fig. 1: The 26 regions of provenanc
Page 121 and 122: the earnings for the forest owner f
Page 123 and 124: Küster H. 1998. Geschichte des Wal
Page 125 and 126: have had human assistance in this c
Page 127 and 128: elow 300 m a. s. l. The species has
Page 129 and 130:
Tab. 2: Age class distribution of t
Page 131 and 132:
with the intention that stands woul
Page 133 and 134:
Tab. 3: European-level beech woodla
Page 135 and 136:
Sourcing of forest reproductive mat
Page 137 and 138:
Recently the four British Regions o
Page 139 and 140:
defoliation, and in severe cases, s
Page 141 and 142:
Herbert R., Samuel S., Patterson G.
Page 143 and 144:
curreNT sTaTus oF GeNeTIc resources
Page 145 and 146:
Fagetalia (Fagetum) Abietion cephal
Page 147 and 148:
Regions of provenances: The whole c
Page 149 and 150:
sILvIcuLTure, reGeNeraTIoN, ForesT
Page 151 and 152:
decidua), oaks (Quercus spp.) or no
Page 153 and 154:
Spanos K. A., Trakolis D., Spanos I
Page 155 and 156:
elevation where beech occurs is ext
Page 157 and 158:
Fig. 2: Climatic envelope of beech
Page 159 and 160:
eGIsTered sources oF reProducTIve m
Page 161 and 162:
maIN beech dIseases aNd PesTs Europ
Page 163 and 164:
In the field of forest genetic rese
Page 165 and 166:
Mátyás V. 1969. Influence des con
Page 167 and 168:
A recent inventory of all forest la
Page 169 and 170:
Photo 1: Stand of beech in Kilbora
Page 171 and 172:
In 1995 and again in 1998 Ireland p
Page 173 and 174:
GeNeTIc resources oF beech IN ITaLy
Page 175 and 176:
Provenance studies revealed differe
Page 177 and 178:
GeNeTIc resources aNd reProducTIve
Page 179 and 180:
A very peculiarly feature of this b
Page 181 and 182:
absTracT curreNT sTaTe oF euroPeaN
Page 183 and 184:
Natural distribution of Fagus sylva
Page 185 and 186:
de Vries S. M. G. 1998a. Activities
Page 187 and 188:
Fig. 1: Natural distribution of Eur
Page 189 and 190:
a long enough period for regenerati
Page 191 and 192:
Gömöry D., Paule L., Schvadchak M
Page 193 and 194:
GeNeTIc resources oF beech (Fagus s
Page 195 and 196:
Fig. 2: The protected area of “Ca
Page 197 and 198:
Monotropa hypopitis. Most of these
Page 199 and 200:
coNservaTIoN aNd raTIoNaL uTILIZaTI
Page 201 and 202:
eFereNces Andreev V. N. 195 . Derev
Page 203 and 204:
curreNT sTaTe oF euroPeaN beech (Fa
Page 205 and 206:
Dumitreşti, Dobra, Voineşti, Bâr
Page 207 and 208:
centre of Poland. The highest value
Page 209 and 210:
Chira D., Dănescu F., Geambaşu N.
Page 211 and 212:
*** 2008. Legea nr. 46/2008: Codul
Page 213 and 214:
and/or Eastern beech. For most char
Page 215 and 216:
dIsTrIbuTIoN, ForesT commuNITIes aN
Page 217 and 218:
(Willd. ex Fr.) Karst., Fomitopsis
Page 219 and 220:
eFereNces Becker M. 1981. Taxonomie
Page 221 and 222:
Society of Geneticists of Serbia an
Page 223 and 224:
Because of its high share in the tr
Page 225 and 226:
purposes is allowed to be procured
Page 227 and 228:
absTracT curreNT sTaTe oF euroPeaN
Page 229 and 230:
the Sub-Mediterranean and in the hi
Page 231 and 232:
euroPeaN beech GeNe PooL PreservaTI
Page 233 and 234:
eech domINaTed ForesT soIL ecosysTe
Page 235 and 236:
Culiberg M. 1994. Dezertifikacija i
Page 237 and 238:
Šercelj A. 1996. Začetki in razvo
Page 239 and 240:
1 2 Region of provenance Altitude (
Page 241 and 242:
sILvIcuLTure aNd ForesT maNaGemeNT
Page 243 and 244:
Ibáñez J. I. 1989. El haya (Fagus
Page 245 and 246:
GeNeraL INFormaTIoN abouT beech IN
Page 247 and 248:
Cheaper and better ways to regenera
Page 249 and 250:
climate on forests and implications
Page 251 and 252:
ecoLoGy aNd dIsTrIbuTIoN oF beech I
Page 253 and 254:
Fig. 2: Map of the Swiss provenance
Page 255 and 256:
eech uNder chaNGING eNvIroNmeNTaL F
Page 257 and 258:
e52/wuehlisch.pdf Zimmermann N. E.,
Page 259 and 260:
egions reach down to the Murat Moun
Page 261 and 262:
characTerIsTIcs aNd ForesT maNaGeme
Page 263 and 264:
Wide distribution of oriental beech
Page 265 and 266:
zones and marginal populations and
Page 267 and 268:
euroPeaN beech (Fagus sylvatica L.)
Page 269 and 270:
On the eastern limit, beech occurs
Page 271 and 272:
of felling area only, whereas the r
Page 273 and 274:
sylvatica L. на північно-
Page 275 and 276:
Reviewers Directory Prof. alexander
Page 277:
dr. eduardo Notivol C.I.T.A. - Gove
Page 280:
334 Hans-Dieter Haenel (Hrsg.) (201
show all

COST Action E 52 - vTI - Bund.de

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?