Four Essays on University Economics - KOPS - Universität Konstanz

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Research Productivity in Business Economics In particular, it is evident that research success must be measured in terms of publications in journals that adhere to some minimum quality standard. For incentive-compatible performance measurement, it is then further necessary to account for quality differences between journals. By the same token, the evaluation strategy needs to be balanced across economics and business economics. Unfortunately, traditional ranking studies have often been tailored to meet the requirements of ‘proper’ economic research. Consequently, the publication data of business economists are underrepresented and the weighting schemes appear inappropriate. In contrast, our analysis reflects the publication habits in the field of business economics. The paper is organized as follows. In the next section, we describe our dataset and our measures of research productivity. Instead of including a comprehensive literature survey, we discuss the relevant literature when we report our results in the following sections. In Section 2.3 we present our department rankings. In Section 2.4 we analyze institutional effects on research productivity and derive some conclusions concerning the training of junior scientists. The impacts of individual characteristics on research performance are analyzed in Section 2.5. The final section provides a brief outlook on important issues for future analysis. 2.2 Data and Methodology We draw on a dataset collected under the auspices of the Committee for Research Mon- itoring of the German Economic Association (Verein für Socialpolitik). The dataset is housed by the Thurgau Institute of Economics and funded by the Association and the Handelsblatt, a leading German business newspaper. It comprises publication records and personal data of roughly 1,800 scientists in the field of Business Economics and Manage- ment who are employed by Austrian, German or (German-speaking) Swiss universities in spring 2008. Most of these researchers are employed by a full university. 1 However, 1 From the original list of university departments provided by the German Rectors’ Conference (HRK), we exclude departments with less than four full professors in our sample - leaving out the International University Bruchsal, the Jacobs University Bremen, the Technical University Graz, the Universities of Erfurt, Hildesheim, Koblenz-Landau and Salzburg, the Kassel International Management School, the WHL Lahr and the International Graduate School (IHI) Zittau. We further omit the Dresden International University, the Steinbeis College Berlin and the Krems-Donau University because their staffs consist (almost exclusively) of academics from other universities on lecture contracts. Owing to its extreme specialization on health management, we also leave out the Medical University Hannover. 21
Research Productivity in Business Economics we also include the academic staff of institutions that, by international standards, rather resemble business schools. 2 We focus on individuals who possess a doctor’s degree and whose principal occupation is academic research and teaching. Part-time lecturers with a primary nonuniversity employment are not included in the dataset. Personal data and data on institutional characteristics of the departments are gleaned from the departments’ homepages. The publications are collected from the EconLit and WISO databases. WISO indexes a large number of journals that publish articles in Ger- man. We account for differences in journal quality by using one of the journal meta- rankings proposed by Schulze et al. (2008). Meta-rankings are generated by imputing several journal weighting schemes that cover different but overlapping sets of journals. Specifically, we employ journal weights of the meta-ranking that uses Ritzberger’s (2008) classification as the base scheme. Ritzberger calculates journal impact factors according to reciprocal citations for SSCI journals in the categories economics, business, finance, industrial relations, and labor, and for selected statistics journals. Schulze et al. (2008) supplement this classification with additional journals that are not included in the SSCI but are ranked in questionnaire surveys conducted by Bräuninger and Haucap (2001), the German Academic Association for Business Research (VHB) and the Vienna University of Economics and Business Administration (WU Wien). While Bräuninger and Haucap’s classification includes many economics journals that publish in German, the VHB and the WU Wien classifications introduce the business economics focus that we need for our analysis. The meta-ranking then classifies 2,825 journals (economics and business administration) by sorting them into six quality groups with group weights ranging from one to six. Intuitively, it may appear more appropriate to use a meta-ranking that is based on the VHB or the WU Wien classification. However, such meta-rankings would virtually place all SSCI-listed journals into the top category. In contrast, using Ritzberger’s (2008) list as the base scheme induces sufficient variation in the journal weights of the resulting meta-ranking. We admit that this procedure may induce a bias against management journals that have an interdisciplinary perspective. For our specific purpose, however, this feature is rather desirable because the results can be readily compared with the 2 The respective schools are legally entitled to award doctor’s degrees. 22
Page 1 and 2: Four Essay
Page 3 and 4: Contents 3.1 Introduction . . . . .
Page 5 and 6: List of Figures 1.1 Total economic
Page 7 and 8: List of Tables 3.6 Summary: Signifi
Page 9 and 10: Summary average quality of research
Page 11 and 12: Chapter 1 How Did Economic Research
Page 13 and 14: Economic research in Switzerland fo
Page 15 and 16: Economic research in Switzerland pu
Page 17 and 18: Economic research in Switzerland Fi
Page 19 and 20: Economic research in Switzerland si
Page 21 and 22: 0,45 0,05 Economic research in Swit
Page 23 and 24: Economic research in Switzerland (2
Page 25 and 26: Wirtschaftspolitik 5 (3), 363 - 375
Page 27: 2.1 Introduction Research Productiv
Page 31 and 32: Research Productivity in Business E
Page 45 and 46: 2.7 Appendix Sample: university dat
Page 55 and 56: Chapter 3 How Can Scholarship Insti
Page 57 and 58: Return of foreign students scholars
Page 59 and 60: Connections in the Home Country Ret
Page 61 and 62: Return of foreign students tegrate
Page 63 and 64: to finance the first period of thei
Page 65 and 66: Return of foreign students Table 3.
Page 67 and 68: Return of foreign students return i
Page 69 and 70: children. Return of foreign student
Page 71 and 72: Return of foreign students A low pa
Page 73 and 74: Return of foreign students trading
Page 75 and 76: Return of foreign students Table 3.
Page 77 and 78: higher return rates might result. R
Page 79 and 80:
3.7 Appendix Return of foreign stud
Page 81 and 82:
Return of foreign students Table 3.
Page 83 and 84:
Page 85 and 86:
Page 87 and 88:
Bibliography Return of foreign stud
Page 89 and 90:
Return of foreign students Park, J.
Page 91 and 92:
4.1 Einleitung Determinanten des be
Page 93 and 94:
4.3.1 Mögliche Einflussfaktoren De
Page 95 and 96:
Determinanten des beruflichen Erfol
Page 97 and 98:
Page 99 and 100:
Page 101 and 102:
teraktionseffekt). Determinanten de
Page 103 and 104:
Page 105 and 106:
Frauen gibt. Determinanten des beru
Page 107 and 108:
4.5.2 Einfluss des Einkommens auf d
Page 109 and 110:
Page 111 and 112:
nimmt ihre Zufriedenheit mit ihren
Page 113 and 114:
Page 115 and 116:
Page 117 and 118:
Literaturverzeichnis Determinanten
Page 119 and 120:
General Bibliography Arora, A., P.
Page 121 and 122:
General Bibliography Combes, P.-P.
Page 123 and 124:
General Bibliography Guimarães, P.
Page 125 and 126:
General Bibliography Martin, P. L.
Page 127 and 128:
General Bibliography Vieira, J. A.
Page 129 and 130:
Zusammenfassung sitäten sind jedoc
Page 131 and 132:
Zusammenfassung ligt, die ihr Studi
Page 133 and 134:
Erklärung Ich versichere hiermit,
show all

Four Essays on University Economics - KOPS - Universität Konstanz

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?