06.02.2013 Views

Primary Retinal Detachment

Primary Retinal Detachment

Primary Retinal Detachment

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Outcomes 91<br />

almost no persistent subretinal fluid involving the macula. Thus, the<br />

recovery of macular function starts immediately postoperatively.<br />

Choroidal detachment is rarely seen in vitrectomized eyes. Endolaser<br />

photocoagulation is more comfortable for the patient and may<br />

cause less surgically-induced inflammation compared with cryotherapy.<br />

If a scleral buckle is used in conjunction with vitrectomy,<br />

it tends to be a smaller buckling element, especially with large<br />

posterior retinal tears. In pseudophakic eyes, there is less change in<br />

postoperative refractive error when no scleral buckle is used.<br />

The complications of vitrectomy may affect the visual and<br />

anatomic outcome. The possibility of iatrogenic retinal breaks as a<br />

result of cutting near mobile retina or from vitreous incarceration<br />

at sclerotomy sites increases the risk of failure. A large gas bubble<br />

may be associated with glaucoma or with iris capture of an<br />

intraocular lens. Unexplained visual field defects may also occur<br />

after vitrectomy. Rarely, a retinal fold that involves the macula is<br />

seen postoperatively. The patient complains of marked distortion.<br />

Endophthalmitis is a rare but devastating complication. In phakic<br />

eyes, the postoperative progression of nuclear cataract may be the<br />

single reason that vitrectomy is not recommended routinely for<br />

every retinal detachment. In a young patient with a clear lens in the<br />

fellow eye, the loss of accommodation resulting from pseudophakia<br />

can be quite disabling. Thus, whenever possible, it is preferable<br />

to use an operation that will not increase the rate of cataract progression.<br />

There are also economic considerations that may play a role in<br />

the choice between vitrectomy and scleral buckling as the primary<br />

treatment for retinal detachment. The cost of supplies for a scleral<br />

buckling procedure is significantly less than that of a vitrectomy.<br />

If cataract surgery is also required later, the cost difference is<br />

multiplied. The rehabilitation time is increased after vitrectomy<br />

compared with scleral buckling. In general, most of my patients<br />

are able to return to work 1 week after scleral buckling. After<br />

vitrectomy, most patients are incapacitated for 2–4 weeks because<br />

of head positioning and inability to drive. There is a prolonged

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!