References 93 7. Heimann

More Magazines

Recommendations

Info

References 93 7. Heimann H, Bornfeld N, Friedrichs W, Helbig H, Kellner U, Korra A, Foerster MH (1996) Primary vitrectomy without scleral buckling for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 234:561–568 8. Bartz-Schmidt KU, Kirchoff B, Heimann K (1996) Primary vitrectomy for pseudophakic retinal detachment. Br J Ophthalmol 80:346–349 9.Campo RV,Sipperley JO,Sneed SR,Park DW,Dugel PV,Jacobsen J, Flindall RJ (1999) Pars plana vitrectomy without scleral buckle for pseudophakic retinal detachments. Ophthalmology 106:1811–1815 10. Devenyi RG, de Carvalho Nakamura H (1999) Combined scleral buckle and pars plana vitrectomy as a primary procedure for pseudophakic retinal detachments. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers 30:615–618 11. Newman DK, Burton RL (1999) Primary vitrectomy for pseudophakic and aphakic retinal detachments. Eye 13:635–639 12. Richardson EC, Verma S, Green WT, Woon H, Chignell A (2000) Primary vitrectomy for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment: an analysis of failure. Eur J Ophthalmol 10:160–166 13. Oshima Y,Yamanishi S, Sawa M, Motokura M, Harino S, Emi K (2000) Two-year follow-up study comparing primary vitrectomy with scleral buckling for macula-off rhegmatogenous retinal detachment. Jpn J Ophthalmol 22:538–549 14. Miki D, Hida T, Hotta K, Shinoda K, Hirakata A (2001) Comparison of scleral buckling and vitrectomy for retinal detachment resulting from flap tears in superior quadrants. Jpn J Ophthalmol 45:187–191 15. LeRouic JF, Behar-Cohen F,Azan F, Bertin S, Bettembourg O, Rumen F, Caudron C, Renard G, Chauvaud D (2002) Vitrectomy without scleral buckle versus ab-externo approach for pseudophakic retinal detachment. J Fr Ophthalmol 24:240–245 16. Heimann H, Hellmich M, Bornfeld N, Bartz-Schmidt KU, Hilgers RD, Foerster MH (2001) Scleral buckling versus primary vitrectomy in rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (SPR Study): design issues and implications, SPR Study report no. 1. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 239:567–574 17. Pournaras CJ, Kapetanios AD (2003) Primary vitrectomy for pseudophakic retinal detachment: a prospective, non-randomized study. Eur J Ophthalmol 13:298–306
Chapter 6 Minimal Segmental Buckling With Sponges and Balloons for Primary Retinal Detachment Ingrid Kreissig Introduction We have known for more than 70 years that a retinal detachment is caused by a break, as Gonin postulated in 1929 [1]. The postulate is no longer in doubt; however, the discussion on how to close it is ongoing. Therefore, the best procedure to repair a rhegmatogenous retinal detachment should be one with a minimum of trauma, a maximum of primary attachment, a minimum of reoperations with a minimum of secondary operations, e.g., cataract, glaucoma, etc., and a maximum of long-term visual function. By the beginning of the twenty-first century, four main surgical techniques had evolved to attach a primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachment, i.e., cerclage with drainage, pneumatic retinopexy, primary vitrectomy, and minimal segmental buckling without drainage (extraocular minimal surgery). All four procedures have one issue in common: to find and close the leaking break that caused the retinal detachment and that would cause a redetachment if not closed. This issue is independent of (1) whether the surgery is limited to the area of the break or extends over the entire detachment and (2) whether it is performed as an extraocular or intraocular procedure. Since the rhegmatogenous detachments present a wide range of findings, each of the four procedures could cover a specific type of detachment. However, the indication of each is somehow in a gray zone, since de facto it depends on the expertise of the individual detachment surgeon.
Page 2 and 3:
Ingrid Kreissig (Ed.) Primary Retin
Page 4 and 5:
Professor Dr. med. Ingrid Kreissig
Page 6 and 7:
Contents 1 The History of Retinal D
Page 8 and 9:
List of Contributors Gary W. Abrams
Page 10 and 11:
List of Contributors XI Hermann D.
Page 12 and 13:
2 Helmholz in 1850 made an accurate
Page 14 and 15:
4 (vitreous, gelatin) into the ante
Page 16 and 17:
6 with scleral resection that set t
Page 18 and 19:
8 ditis [72-74].Temperatures up to
Page 20 and 21:
10 1 The History of Retinal Detachm
Page 22 and 23:
Page 24 and 25:
Page 26 and 27:
16 ion [147]. Perfluorocarbon liqui
Page 28 and 29:
Page 30 and 31:
Page 32 and 33:
Page 34 and 35:
Page 36 and 37:
26 2 Prophylaxis in Fellow Eye of P
Page 38 and 39:
Page 40 and 41:
Page 42 and 43:
32 found that eyes with pre-existin
Page 44 and 45:
Page 46 and 47:
36 3 Encircling Operation with Drai
Page 48 and 49:
Page 50 and 51:
Page 52 and 53: 42 3 Encircling Operation with Drai
Page 64 and 65: Chapter 4 Pneumatic Retinopexy for
Page 66 and 67: Technique 57 Case Selection Proper
Page 68 and 69: Technique 59 Table 4.1. Gas charact
Page 70 and 71: Technique 61 solution; however,thes
Page 72 and 73: Technique 63 gas reflux. Following
Page 74 and 75: Complications: Prevention and Manag
Page 76 and 77: New Possibilities 67 ing on type an
Page 78 and 79: Results 69 Table 4.7 (continued) Au
Page 80 and 81: Discussion 71 surgical failures. Fa
Page 82 and 83: Discussion 73 Disadvantages of PR A
Page 84 and 85: References 75 situations, then to p
Page 86 and 87: References 77 24. Tornambe PE, Hilt
Page 88 and 89: References 79 51. Pournaras CJ, Don
Page 90 and 91: Chapter 5 Vitrectomy for the Primar
Page 92 and 93: Indications 83 Table 5.1. Indicatio
Page 94 and 95: Indications 85 Fig. 5.2. The vitreo
Page 96 and 97: Surgical Technique 87 vitrectomy an
Page 98 and 99: Outcomes 89 will be visible under a
Page 100 and 101: Outcomes 91 almost no persistent su
Page 104 and 105: 96 6 Minimal Segmental Buckling Wit
Page 106 and 107: 98 6 Minimal Segmental Buckling Wit
Page 108 and 109: 100 the operating table with the re
Page 110 and 111: 102 6 Minimal Segmental Buckling Wi
Page 114 and 115: 106 a b 6 Minimal Segmental Bucklin
Page 122 and 123: 114 a 6 Minimal Segmental Buckling
Page 130 and 131: 122 c d 6 Minimal Segmental Bucklin
Page 132 and 133: 124 c Fig. 6.14c 6 Minimal Segmenta
Page 134 and 135: Table 6.1. Preoperative characteris
Page 136 and 137: Table 6.3. Final attachment after m
Page 138 and 139: 130 Choroidals In 4 of the 1,462 de
Page 140 and 141: Table 6.4. Visual acuity at 2 years
Page 148 and 149: 140 Probably, the future question n
Page 152 and 153:
144 6 Minimal Segmental Buckling Wi
Page 154 and 155:
146 7 Pharmacological Approaches to
Page 156 and 157:
Page 158 and 159:
Page 160 and 161:
152 heparin was published in eyes u
Page 162 and 163:
154 search for compounds with hepar
Page 164 and 165:
Page 166 and 167:
Page 168 and 169:
Chapter 8 Systematic Review of Effi
Page 170 and 171:
Materials and Methods 163 Table 8.2
Page 172 and 173:
Discussion 165 30% 25% 20% 15% 10%
Page 174 and 175:
Discussion 167 Fig. 8.2. The small
Page 176 and 177:
Conclusion 169 vitrectomy and searc
Page 178 and 179:
References 171 8. Brazitikos PD, D
Page 180 and 181:
References 173 34. Gunduz K, Gunalp
Page 182 and 183:
References 175 63. Schepens CL (195
Page 184 and 185:
178 9 Repair of Primary Retinal Det
Page 186 and 187:
180 a b Fig. 9.3a,b. Legend see pag
Page 188 and 189:
Page 190 and 191:
Page 192 and 193:
186 a b 9 Repair of Primary Retinal
Page 194 and 195:
188 might eliminate traction on the
Page 196 and 197:
Page 198 and 199:
Chapter 10 Retinal Detachment Repai
Page 200 and 201:
Retinal Detachment Repair: Outlook
Page 202 and 203:
Page 204 and 205:
Page 206 and 207:
Page 208 and 209:
Page 210 and 211:
Page 212 and 213:
References 207 It is impossible to
Page 214 and 215:
210 C Campbell 7 case selection 57,
Page 216 and 217:
212 M Machemer 13 macular - complic
Page 218 and 219:
214 retinal - detachment - - bilate
show all

Primary Retinal Detachment

Transform your PDFs into Flipbooks and boost your revenue!

Delete template?

Save as template ?