Småhus, flerbostadshus och förskolebyggnader - Svanen

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Nordisk Miljømerking Hus, leiligheter og barnehager 089/versjon 2 Høringssammenstilling, oppdatert 10. august 2010 Nordisk Miljømerkings kommentar Takk for kommentaren. Kravet er endret, se kommentarer under krav P1. 5.2. Krav til energi og innemiljø som der diskutert men ikke tatt med i kriterien Rockwool A/S, Danmark 5.4. Faktorerne Termisk komfort, Varmesystem og CO2, og solafskærmning er alle meget vigtige for en bygnings indeklima og energiforbrug. Indføres i kriterier. 5.5. Krav 020 Vi støtter brugen af konstruktiv bygningsbeskyttelse. For eksempel kan rigtigt dimensionerede udhæng i bygningerne forlænge bygningens materialers levetid væsentligt, samtidig med at udhænget giver en solafskærmning, så overophedning om sommeren undgås. Begge dele vil indvirke positivt på bygningens bæredygtighed. Der gives points for konstruktiv bygningsbeskyttelse. Nordisk Miljømerkings kommentar Takk for kommentarene, dette vil vi se mer på ved neste revisjon. 5.3. Materialkrav, kjemiske produkter Plast- & Kemiföretagen Sverige På sidan 27 i bakgrundsdokumentet står följande: ”Vid remissen till version 1 av kriterierna framkom det att byggbranschen jobbar mot att ställa denna typ av krav på egenskaperna i stället för på ämnen. Svanen bifaller denna utveckling och har för kemiska byggprodukter följt denna linje.” Hur kan Svanen skriva detta när man samtidigt använder sig av listor i kraven O17 och O22? Nordisk Miljømerkings kommentar Takk for kommentarene. Det har ikke vært tilstrekkelig å kun stille krav til egenskaper ved denne revisjonen. 5.4. Krav til trevirke og andre materialer basert på fiber O24 Kontrollert råvare Central Union of Agricultural Producers and Forest Owners (MTK) Finland The text: ”The licence applicant must ensure that wood raw materials do not originate from forest, natural or agricultural environments meriting protection due to their high biological and/or social value. Nordic Ecolabelling may revoke the licence if it is found that wood raw materials are derived from forest environments of this type.” should be replace by the text: 146 (165)
Nordisk Miljømerking Hus, leiligheter og barnehager 089/versjon 2 Høringssammenstilling, oppdatert 10. august 2010 “”The licence applicant must ensure that wood raw materials do not originate from areas designated by law or by the relevant competent authority for nature protection purposes; nor areas officially assigned for the protection of threatened ecosystems or species recognised by the relevant competent authorities. Nordic Ecolabelling may revoke the licence if it is found that wood raw materials are derived from forest environments of this type.” justification: The original text leaves it very vague how, by which criteria and by whom the high biological and/or social value is defined. Also, the original text does not define how it is evaluated whether such area “merits protection”. It would be impossible for the licence applicant to know when it actually meets the requirement set. The text: “The building manufacturer must have a documented procedure or policy as how best to ensure that wood and bamboo raw materials are not derived from forest, natural or agricultural environments that: - Are felled illegally; and/or - Have a high biological and/or social value. should be replaced by text: “The building manufacturer must have a documented procedure or policy as how best to ensure that wood and bamboo raw materials are not derived from: - areas illegally harvested - areas designated by law or by the relevant competent authority for nature protection purposes - areas officially assigned for the protection of threatened ecosystems or species recognised by the relevant competent authorities. Illegal harvesting take place when timber is harvested in violation of national laws of the country of harvest. The applicable legislation includes forest and environmental legislation regulating timber harvesting”. justification: The original text leaves it very vague how, by which criteria and by whom the high biological and/or social value is defined. Also, the original text does not define how it is evaluated whether such area “merits protection”. It would be impossible for the licence applicant to know when it actually meets the requirement set. The original text does not define what is meant with the term “felled illegally”. The country whose legislation is to be observed as well as the scope of legislation have to be defined. Comments from Nordic Eccolabelling Thank you for your comments. The requirements have been altered. 147 (165)
Page 1 and 2:
Høringssammenstilling for Hus, fle
Page 3 and 4:
P8 Høyere andel virke fra sertifis
Page 5 and 6:
Nordisk Miljømerking Hus, leilighe
Page 7 and 8:
2. Om høringen Nordisk Miljømerki
Page 9 and 10:
Page 11 and 12:
Page 13 and 14:
Page 15 and 16:
Page 17 and 18:
Page 19 and 20:
Page 21 and 22:
Page 23 and 24:
Page 25 and 26:
Page 27 and 28:
Page 29 and 30:
Page 31 and 32:
Page 33 and 34:
Page 35 and 36:
Page 37 and 38:
Page 39 and 40:
Page 41 and 42:
Page 43 and 44:
Page 45 and 46:
Page 47 and 48:
Page 49 and 50:
Page 51 and 52:
Page 53 and 54:
Page 55 and 56:
Page 57 and 58:
Page 59 and 60:
Page 61 and 62:
Page 63 and 64:
Page 65 and 66:
Page 67 and 68:
Page 69 and 70:
Page 71 and 72:
Page 73 and 74:
Page 75 and 76:
Page 77 and 78:
Page 79 and 80:
Page 81 and 82:
Page 83 and 84:
Page 85 and 86:
Page 87 and 88:
Page 89 and 90:
Page 91 and 92:
Page 93 and 94:
Page 95 and 96: Nordisk Miljømerking Hus, leilighe
Page 99 and 100: Peab PGS AB Sverige BASTA täcker i
Page 145: Nordisk Miljømerking Hus, leilighe
Page 155 and 156: Tabell 5: Norske høringssvar Høri
Page 165: Nordisk Miljømerking Hus, leilighe
show all

Småhus, flerbostadshus och förskolebyggnader - Svanen

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?