29.09.2013 Views

Småhus, flerbostadshus och förskolebyggnader - Svanen

Småhus, flerbostadshus och förskolebyggnader - Svanen

Småhus, flerbostadshus och förskolebyggnader - Svanen

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Nordisk Miljømerking<br />

Hus, leiligheter og barnehager 089/versjon 2<br />

Høringssammenstilling, oppdatert 10. august 2010<br />

REACH focuses on gathering existing data, filling potential data gaps, identifying<br />

potential hazards, determining exposure and evaluating potential risks through the<br />

scientific chemical safety assessment process. REACH clearly recognises that a risk is<br />

related to a use or an application. The safe use of a substance is documented via the<br />

exposure scenarios in the extended Safety Data Sheet which is passed down the supply<br />

chain. This riskıbased approach throughout the substance life cycle is the common<br />

ground of the EU chemicals regulation.<br />

3 Construction Products Regulation (CPR) COM (2008) 311 final<br />

4 REACH (Regulation EC 1907/2006)<br />

5 Existing Substances Regulation - No 793/93 on the evaluation and control of the<br />

risks of existing substances.<br />

The Nord Ecolabel prohibits certain substances / R phrases without verifying whether the<br />

use of the substance/ product is leading to risks for users / the environment. Neither does<br />

it assess whether the use of a certain substance / product improves the life cycle<br />

performance of the overall building (durability, reduced material use etc.).<br />

On the other hand, the use / presence of certain substances which are proven to be<br />

carcinogenic is authorised without restrictions. Hence, it is doubtful whether<br />

environmental and health protection was really the main driver for this Ecolabel.<br />

This impression is reinforced by the proposed exclusion of substances for which<br />

scientific evidence shows that they are not dangerous (see following section).<br />

CPIF calls on the Nordic Ecolabel to put the material criteria on a scientific basis and<br />

apply the approach adopted by European legislation.<br />

Sveriges Fog- <strong>och</strong> Limleverantörers Förening<br />

Färgfabrikanternas Förening<br />

I <strong>och</strong> med att dessa kriterier används på den europeiska marknaden <strong>och</strong> skall existera i de<br />

närmaste fem åren, är det inte lämpligt att hänvisa till lagstiftning som snabbt håller på at<br />

bli obsolet i form av ämnes <strong>och</strong> preparatdirektiv. REACH gäller redan idag i EU <strong>och</strong> alla<br />

dess olika regler <strong>och</strong> aspekter kommer successivt att införas, varför dessa kriterier bör<br />

hänvisa till REACH istället.<br />

GHS (Globally Harmonised System) är FNs grundsystem <strong>och</strong> skiljer sig åt på många<br />

punkter mot det som införs i EU just nu som benämns CLP.<br />

Comments from Nordic Ecolabelling<br />

Thank you for your comments. Nordic Ecolabelling does not agree that by introducing<br />

REACH, ecolabelling requirements regarding chemicals is not necessary. We would like<br />

to point out that Swan labelling of a product is voluntarily and the objective of the<br />

criteria is to be more stringent than the authorities´ requirements.<br />

69 (165)

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!