3 - agepi

5. Dr. Christopher, P. Raymond. The Economic Importance
of Patents (1996). The Intellectual Property
Institute.
6. Андреев И. Россия и Африка: что впереди
“Москва”, август 1999, с. 133-146.
7. Kolker P. L. Patents in the pharmaceutical industry//
Patent World, 1997, № 88, pp. 34-37.
8. Annual report of JPO, 2000.
9. McQueen D.H. Patents and Swedish University
Spin-off Companies: Patent Ownership and Economic
Health. Patent World, issue 80, March 1996, pp.22-27
10. Sanders B. S, Rossman J. and Harris L. J. The
economic impact of patents. Patent, Trademark and
Copyright Journal, September 1958, 340-362
11. Scherer F. M. Corporate inventive output, pro ts
and growth. The Journal of Political Economy Z, 1965,
pp. 290-297.
12. Scherer F. M. Firm size, market structure, opportunity,
and output of patented inventions. The American
Economic Journal 55, 1965, pp.1097-1125.
13. Montroll E. W. and Shlesinger M.F. Maximum
entropy formalism, fractals, scaling phenomena and 1/f
noise: a tail or tails. Journal of Statistical Physics 32,
1983, pp. 209-230.
14. Mans eld E. Patents and innovation: an empirical
study. Management Science 32, 1986, pp. 173-181.
15. Лисин Б. К., Фридлянов В.Н. Инновации № 7,
2002 г.
16. Maskus K. & McDaniel, C. (1999) Impacts of the
Japanese Patent System on Productivity Growth. Japan
and the World Economy, vol. 11, pp. 557-574.
17. Dahab S. (1986) Technological Change in the
Brazilian Agriculture Implements Industry, Unpublished
PhD dissertation, Yale University, New Haven; and
Mikkelsen K. (1984) Inventive Activity in Philippines
Industry, Unpublished PhD dissertation, Yale University,
New Haven.
18. This draws on Maskus and McDaniel (1999) and
Kumar (2002).
19. Mans eld (1986).
20. Thomas S. Intellectual Property in Biotechnology
SMEs, in Blackburn R. (ed.) (in press) “Intellectual
Property and Innovation Management in Small Firms”,
Routledge, London.
21. Maskus K. & McDaniel C. (1999) Impacts of the
Japanese Patent System on Productivity Growth. Japan
and the World Economy, vol. 11, pp. 557-574.
22. Gould D. & Gruben W. (1996) “The Role of Intellectual
Property Rights in Economic Growth”, Journal
of Development Economics, vol. 48, pp. 323-350.
See discussion in Kumar (2002), p. 6 and in Maskus
(2000a), p. 169.
23. See discussion in Maskus (2000a), pp. 102-109.
SUMMARY
It is alleged that a condition of evolutional increase of the intellectual property value is presence
of the stock of industrial and information technologies which are subjected to natural selection.
Natural selection means a comparative estimation of the intellectual property with reference to the
given ecological niche, i.e. search of their optimum value. The evolution of the given type of selection
is dened by external and internal conditions. The external ones are reaction of the market or
the response of the environment to the action of the factors of natural selection. The internal ones is
the program of contradictions inhered in any technical object which limits the evolutionary opportunities
of new technologies.
However, in our opinion the prevailing factor of effective in uence on economy is the natural selection
as a result of use of both traditional and new kinds of intellectual property. Clearly, the latter is
not self-sufcient: it needs the reaction of the external user as factor of natural selection.
33